Abstract
Drawing heavily on Wittgenstein, Winch’s The Idea of a Social Science advanced a forceful and still valuable critique of positivist/empiricist conceptions of social science. In its more self-confident assertions concerning the nature of philosophy and society, however, Winch failed to recognize Wittgenstein’s acknowledgement of and appreciation for the indeterminacy and unsettled character of social and moral life.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Flathman, Richard E.
(1992 ) Willful Liberalism: Voluntarism and Individuality in Political Theory and Practice . Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press .
2.
Flathman, Richard E.
(1998 ) Reflections of a Would-Be Anarchist: Ideals and Institutions of Liberalism . Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press .
3.
Winch, Peter
(1958 ) The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy . London : Routledge & Kegan Paul .
4.
Winch, Peter
(1972 ) Ethics and Action . London : Routledge & Kegan Paul .
5.
Winch, Peter
(1987 ) Trying to Make Sense . Oxford : Blackwell .
6.
Winch, Peter
(1989 ) Simon Weil: The Just Balance . New York : Cambridge University Press .
7.
Winch, Peter
(1990 ) The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy , 2nd edn.
London : Routledge .
8.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
(1922 ) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus . London : Routledge & Kegan Paul .
9.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
(1926 ) ‘Lecture on Ethics’ , Philosophical Review
74 : 3 -26 .
10.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
(1953 ) Philosophical Investigations . New York : Macmillan .
11.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
(1967 ) Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics . Oxford : Blackwell .
12.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
(1969 ) On Certainty . Oxford : Blackwell .
13.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
(1980 ) Culture and Value . Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press .
