Bloor, D. (1983) Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.
2.
Button, G. , Coulter, J., Lee, J. R. E. and Sharrock, W. W. (1995) Computers, Minds and Conduct. Oxford: Polity.
3.
Callon, M. (1986) ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay’, in J. Law (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 196-233.
4.
Collins, H. M. and Pinch, T. (1993) The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Coulter, J. (1991) ‘Logic: Ethnomethodology and the Logic of Language’, in G. Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 20-50.
6.
Coulter, J. (1995) ‘The Informed Neuron: Issues in the Use of Information Theory in the Behavioral Sciences’, Minds and Machines5: 583-596.
7.
Daston, L. and Galison, P. (1992) ‘The Image of Objectivity’, Representations40: 81-128.
8.
Dear, P. (1995) Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Fujimura, J. (1999) ‘Authorizing Knowledge in Science and Anthropology’, American Anthropologist100: 347-360.
10.
Galison, P. and Stump, D., eds (1996) The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Garfinkel, H. (1991) ‘Respecification: Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order, Logic, Reason, Meaning, Method, etc. in and as of the Essential Haecceity of Immortal Ordinary Society (I) - an Announcement of Studies’, in G. Button (ed.) Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10-19.
12.
Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
13.
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
Gross, P. , Levitt, N. and Lewis, M., eds (1996) The Flight from Science and Reason. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
15.
Haack, S. (1998) Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Hacker, P. M. S. (1996) Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
17.
Hacking, I. (1999) The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Haraway, D. (1988) ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism as a Site of Discourse on the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, Feminist Studies14: 575-599.
19.
Haraway, D. (1991) ‘A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century’, in D. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, pp. 149-181.
20.
Harding, S. (1996) ‘Standpoint Epistemology (a Feminist Version): How Social Disadvantage Creates Epistemic Advantage’, in S. Turner (ed.) Social Theory and Sociology: The Classics and Beyond. Oxford: Blackwell.
21.
Kaufmann, F. (1944) Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
23.
Law, J. (1994) Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
Lyas, C. (1999) Peter Winch. Teddington, Mx: Acumen.
25.
Lynch, M. (1992) ‘Extending Wittgenstein: The Pivotal Move from Epistemology to the Sociology of Science’, in A. Pickering (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 215-265.
26.
Lynch, M. (1993) Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Lynch, M. and Bogen, D. (1997) ‘Sociology’s Asociological “Core”: An Examination of Textbook Sociology in Light of the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge’, American Sociological Review62: 481-493.
28.
Lynch, M. and Macbeth, D. (1998) ‘Demonstrating Physics Lessons’, in J. Greeno and S. Goldman (eds) Thinking Practices in Mathematics and Science Learning. Marwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 269-297.
29.
Megill, A. , ed. (1994) Rethinking Objectivity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30.
Monk, R. (1990) Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. London: Vintage.
31.
Pickering, A. (1984) ‘Against Putting the Phenomena First: The Discovery of the Weak Neutral Current’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science15: 85-117.
32.
Pickering, A. (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Ross, A. , ed. (1996) Science Wars. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
34.
Ryle, G. (1954) ‘The World of Science and the Everyday World’, in G. Ryle, Dilemmas: The Tanner Lectures 1953. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68-81.
35.
Ryle, G. (1971) Collected Papers, Vol. 2. London: Hutchinson.
36.
Shapin, S. (1994) A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Sharrock, W. and Button, G. (1991) ‘The Social Actor: Social Action in Real Time’, in G. Button (ed.) Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 137-175.
38.
Winch, P. (1958) The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
39.
Winch, P. (1970) ‘Understanding a Primitive Society’, in B. Wilson (ed.) Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 78-111.
40.
Winch, P. (1993) ‘Discussion of Malcolm’s Essay’, in N. Malcolm (ed.) Wittgenstein: A Religious Point of View?London: Routledge, pp. 95-136.
41.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.