The public sector reforms being pursued by 'New Labour' attempt to develop a new style of policy making and to shift the centre of gravity of public services away from the state and market and towards the citizen. The improvement of local public services will however depend in large measure on the capacity of local agencies to implement these reforms. The experiences of the local authorities that are piloting the Best Value framework suggest that there are significant cultural and structural barriers to change, and that councils will need to develop a range of new skills in order to implement the new regime. Existing development programmes, which rely on the dissemination of good practice between local authorities, pay insufficient attention to the need for fundamental restructuring of both local and central government and for more effective joint working between the public, private and voluntary sectors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benington, J. and J.F. Hartley (1999), 'Models of organizational and cultural change in central and local government' , Paper presented to the Third International Research Symposium on Public Management, (Birmingham).
2.
Blair T. (1998a) Modernising government. Unpublished Internal Personal Minute.
3.
Blair T. (1998b), Leading the way: a new vision for local government, ( London: IPPR ).
4.
Bovaird, A.G. (1998), Achieving Best Value through competition, benchmarking and performance networks, Warwick/DETR Best Value Working Paper Series Number 6. ( Coventry: University of Warwick ).
5.
Boyne, G.A. (2000), 'Planning, performance and public services' , Public Administration, Vol.78, Forthcoming.
6.
Briscoe, B. (1997), 'The new local government agenda' , Public Money and Management, Vol.17, No. 4, pp. 4-6 .
7.
Clarence, E. and C. Painter (1998), 'Public services under New Labour: collaborative discourses and local networking' , Public Policy and Administration, Vol.13, No. 3, pp. 8-22 .
8.
Clarke, R. , G. Gillanders , S. Goss , J. Rowe , K. Rudat , H. Shaftoe and M. Stewart (1999), Cross-cutting issues affecting local government, ( London: DETR ).
9.
Cm 3681 (1997), Excellence in Schools: proposal for raising standards in schools, ( London: The Stationary Office ).
10.
Cm 3807 (1997), The new NHS: modern, dependable, ( London: The Stationery Office ).
11.
Cm 4014 (1998), Modern local government: in touch with the people, ( London: The Stationery Office ).
12.
Cm 4169 (1998), Modernising Social Services: Promoting independence, Improving protection, Raising standards, ( London: The Stationary Office ).
13.
Cm 4181 (1998), Public services for the future: modernisation, reform and account-ability, ( London: The Stationary Office ).
14.
Cm 4310 (1999), Modernising government, ( London: The Stationery Office ).
15.
Corrigan, P. , P. Joyce , T. McNulty and A. Rose (1999), 'Towards a model of user-led innovation in local government' , Paper presented to the Third International Research Symposium on Public Management, (Birmingham).
16.
DETR (1998a), Modernising local government: improving services through best value, ( London: The Stationary Office ).
17.
DETR (1999a), Performance indicators for 2000/2001: a joint consultation document produced by the DETR and the Audit Commission on Best Value and local authority performance indicators for 2000/2001, ( London: DETR ).
18.
DETR (1999b), The Beacon Council Scheme: Prospectus, ( London: DETR ).
19.
Falconer, P.K. (1999), 'The New Public Management today: an overview' , Paper presented to the First ESRC Seminar on Recent developments in the New Public Management, (London: Imperial College).
20.
Filkin, G. (1999), Building capacity for Best Value, ( London: New Local Government Network ).
21.
Freer, S. (1998), 'Making a success of Best Value' , Public Money and Management, Vol.18, No. 4, pp. 2-3 .
22.
Hayden, C. (1999), 'Evaluation: not checking but learning', Better Government for Older People Bulletin, January.
23.
HMSO (1999), The Local Government Act, ( London: The Stationery Office ).
24.
Hood, C. (1991), 'A public management for all seasons' , Public Administration, Vol.69, No. 1, pp. 3-19 .
25.
Hughes, M. and J. Newman (1999), 'From new public management to new labour: from "new" to "modem"' , Paper presented to the Third International Research Symposium on Public Management, (Birmingham).
26.
IDeA (1999), Best Value Initiatives Database, ( London: Improvement and Development Agency ).
27.
Jervis, P. and S. Richards (1997), 'Public management: raising our game' , Public Money and Management, Vol.17, No. 2, pp. 9-16 .
28.
LGA (1999), Improving from within: Local Government Improvement Project - final report and recommendations, ( London: Local Government Association ).
29.
Local Government Modernisation Team (1999), Local Government Modernisation Team Key Objectives. Unpublished note.
30.
Martin, S.J. (1998), 'Achieving Best Value through consultation and public engagement', WarwickIDETR Best Value Working Paper Series Number 8, ( Coventry: University of Warwick ).
31.
Martin, S.J. (1999a), 'Picking winners or piloting best value? an analysis of English Best Value bids' , Local Government Studies, Vol.25No. 2 pp. 53-67 .
32.
Martin, S.J (1999b), 'Visions of Best Value: modernising or just muddling through?' , Public Money and Management, Vol.20No. 4. Forthcoming.
33.
Martin, S.J. (2000), 'Implementing 'Best Value': local public services in transition' , Public Administration, Vol.78, No. 1. Forthcoming.
34.
Martin, S.J. , H. Davis , A.G. Bovaird , M.N. Geddes , J.F. Hartley , M. Lewis , I. Sanderson and P. Sapwell (1999), Improving local public services: an interim evaluation of the Best Value pilot programme, ( London: The Stationery Office ).
35.
Mawson, J. and K. Spencer (1997), 'The government offices of the English Regions: towards regional government?' , Policy and Politics, Vol.25, No. 1, pp. 71-84 .
36.
Painter, C. and E. Clarence (1999), 'New Labour and intergovernmental management: flexible networks or performance control?' Paper presented to the Third International Research Symposium on Public Management, (Birmingham).
37.
Power, M. (1994), The audit explosion, ( London: Demos ).
38.
Power, M. (1997), The audit society: rituals of verification, ( Oxford: OUP ).
39.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996), 'The New Governance: governing without government' , Political Studies, Vol.44, No. 4, pp. 652-667 .
40.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997), 'From marketisation to diplomacy: it's the mix that matters' , Public Policy and Administration, Vol.12, No. 2, pp. 31-50 .
41.
Sanderson, I. (1998), 'Achieving Best Value through fundamental performance review', Warwick/IDETR Best Value Working Paper Series Number 6, ( Coventry: University of Warwick ).
42.
University of Birmingham School of Public Policy (1999), Cross-cutting issues in public policy and public service, ( London: DETR ).
43.
Walker, D. (1998), 'The new local government agenda: a response' , Public Money and Management, Vol.18, No. 1, pp. 4-5 .
