Joined Up Accountability: Bringing the Citizen Back In

Abstract

Accountability in complex organisational networks has been identified as particularly problematic, and an issue to be addressed, both in academic and in official documents. Indeed, in launching its new public service reform agenda, the Labour government has undertaken to address accountability at a later date rather than as an integral part of its approach to reform. This article seeks to address these questions of accountability, suggesting the need to reformulate our understanding of the concept itself, placing a citizen-focused accountability at the heart of the way in which services are understood and evaluated.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cabinet Office (1998), Quangos: Opening the Doors, ( London: The Stationery Office .)

Cabinet Office (1999), Modernising Government, ( London: The Stationery Office .)

Dailey, G. , and Berthoud, R. (1992), Challenging Discretion: The Social Fund Review Procedure, ( London: Policy Studies Institute .)

Department of Social Security (1998a), Social Security Departmental Report: the Government's Expenditure Plans 1998/99, ( London: The Stationery Office .)

Department of Social Security (1998b), Annual Report by the Secretary of State for Social Security on the Social Fund 1997/98, ( London: The Stationery Office .)

Huby, M. , and Dix, G. (1992), Evaluating the Social Fund, ( London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office .)

Lipsky, M. (1980), Street-level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services, ( New York: Russell Sage Foundation .)

National Audit Office (1991), The Social Fund, ( London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office .)

Niskanen, W. (1971), Bureaucracy and Representative Government, ( Chicago: Aldine .)

10.

Perri 6 (1997), Holistic Government, ( London: Demos .)

11.

Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997), Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, ( Buckingham: Open University Press .)

12.

Roberts, J. (1996), 'From Discipline to Dialogue: individualising and socialising forms of accountability', in Munro, R. , and Mouritsen, J. (eds), Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing, ( London: International Thompson Business Press .)

13.

Rowe, M. (1998a), Accountability for Discretion: the Social Fund , paper presented to the International Institute of Administrative Sciences conference on 'The Citizen and Public Administration', Paris.

14.

Rowe, M. (1998b), Accounts of Discretion , paper presented to the European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management conference on 'Accounting for the New Public Management', Venice.

15.

Stewart, J. (1992), The Rebuilding of Public Accountability, ( London: European Policy Forum .)

16.

Tullock, G. (1965), The Politics of Bureaucracy, ( Washington: Public Affairs Press .)

17.

Waldegrave, W. (1993), The Reality of Reform and Accountability in Today's Public Service, ( London: CIPFA .)

18.

Weir, S. , and Beetham, D. (1998), Political Power and Democratic Control in Britain, ( London: Routledge .)

19.

Weir, S. , and Hall, W. (1994), EGO Trip: Extra-governmental Organisations in the United Kingdom and their Accountability, ( London: Charter 88 .)

20.

Wilmott, R. (1996), 'Thinking Accountability: accounting for the disciplined production of self', in Munro, R. , and Mouritsen, J. (eds.), Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing, ( London: International Thomson Business Press .)