Contracting for Services-a Double Jeopardy? An Analysis of Contract Compliance in the Context of European and UK Social and Public Procurement Policy

Abstract

This article discusses the scope for implementing a contract compliance policy in the UK as part of the new Best Value regime for local authority contracting. The article examines the interrelationship between compulsory competitive tendering policy in the UK and EU social and public procurement policies, drawing upon secondary research and case-law on the social and employment effects of contracting-out. The article identifies the problem of a ‘double jeopardy’ for local authorities adopting contract compliance policies: even if national procurement policies are adapted to accommodate these policies, any attempt to impose contract compliance through large service contracts will be contrary to EU law under the services directive.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arrowsmith, S. (1995), ‘Public procurement as an instrument of policy and the impact of market liberalisation’, Law Quarterly Review, April, pp.235-284.

Bennett, J. , and Cirrell, S. (1992), ‘The interrelationship of EC public procurement and compulsory competitive tendering in the United Kingdom’, Public Procurement Law Review, Vol 1, pp.280-291.

Bourn, C. , and Whitmore, J. (1996), Anti-Discrimination Law in Britain, (London: Sweet and Maxwell).

British Personnel Management News (1996), September, No. 111.

Committee on the Administration of Justice (1996), Fair Employment for All, (Belfast: CAJ)

Cecchini, P. (1987), The Cost of Non-Europe in Public Sector Procurement, (Luxemburg: W.S. Atkins Management Consultants).

Department of the Environment (1996), Guidance on the Conduct of Compulsory Competitive Tendering, Circular 5/96, (London and Cardiff: DoE and Welsh Office).

Department of Labor (1983), Report of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance: A Review of the Effects of Executive Order 112246 and Federal Contract Compliance Programmes on Employment, (Washington: Department of Labor).

Docksey, C. (1991), ‘The principle of equality as a fundamental right under Community law’, The Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp 258-280.

10.

Equal Opportunities Commission for Northern Ireland (1996), Report on Formal Investigation into Competitive Tendering in Health and Education Services in Northern Ireland, (Belfast: EOC).

11.

Equal Opportunities Commission (1995), The Gender Impact of CCT in Local Government, (Manchester: EOC).

12.

European Commission (1996), Green Paper-Public Procurement in the European Union: Exploring the Way Forward, (Luxemburg: Office of Official Publications of the EC).

13.

Hastings, S. , and Levie, H. (Eds) (1983), Privatisation?, (Nottingham: Spokesman).

14.

Kelliher, C. , and McKenna, S. (1988), ‘The employment implications of government policy: a case study of public sector catering’, Employee Relations, Vol.10, No 2, pp.8-13.

15.

Labour Research (1991), ‘A contract to kill, ’ Labour Research, January 1991.

16.

Morris, P.E. (1990), ‘Legal regulation of contract compliance-an Anglo-American comparison’, 19 Anglo-American Legal Review, 87-87.

17.

Osborne, R.D. , Gallagher, A.M. , Cormack, R.J. and Shortall, S. (1996) ‘The Implementation of the Policy Appraisal and Fair Treatment Guidelines in Northern Ireland’ in Quirk, P. , and McLaughlin, E. , Policy Aspects of Employment Equality in Northern Ireland, (Belfast: Standing Advisory Committee on Human Rights).

18.

Standing Advisory Commission on Human Rights (1997), Employment Equality: Building for the Future (a comprehensive review of employment equality after five years of the operation of the Fair Employment (NI) Act 1989 and of the Fair Employment (NI) Act 1989 as amended), (Belfast: SACHR).

19.

Trades Union Congress (1984), Contractors' Failures, (London: TUC).