This article seeks to apply rationalist and incrementalist models of the policy process to local government reorganisation from 1957 to 1996. The ambiguities and tensions in the models between description and prescription and between process and outcome are briefly explored, and the complexity of the models acknowledged, as a prelude to their application to the wide variety of approaches to the structural reorganisation of local government. While the quasi-incremental processes of the 1958 and 1992 Local Government Commissions are widely perceived to have failed, most of the recommendations of the more ostensibly rational Herbert, Wheatley and Redcliffe-Maud Royal Commissions have not endured, suggesting some inherent problems with both models. The frequency and extent of changes in local government structure scarcely confirm incrementalist expectations over outcomes, yet the failure of the more radical innovations to win long-term acceptance and legitimacy may be held to give some retrospective justification for gradualist caution. However, the cumulative failure of the reform process may ultimately reflect a misdiagnosis of the underlying problems of local government - essentially a rationalist critique. If a defective structure was not the main problem, reorganisation was not the solution.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, A. (1982a), The Politics of Local Government in the United Kingdom, (Harlow: Longman).
2.
Alexander, A. (1982b), Local Government in Britain since Reorganisation, (London: George Allen and Unwin).
3.
Brand, J. (1974), Local Government Reform in England 1888-1974, (London: Croom Helm).
4.
Braybrooke, D and Lindblom, C. E. (1963), The Strategy of Decision (New York: Free Press).
5.
Bristow, S., Kermode, D. and Mannin, M. (eds.) (1984), The Redundant Counties, (Ormskirk: G.W. and A. Hesketh).
6.
Cmnd. 1164 (1960), Report of the Royal Commission on Local Government in Greater London (Herbert) (London: HMSO).
7.
Cmnd. 4040 (1969), Report of the Royal Commission on Local Government in England (Redcliffe-Maud), three volumes, (London: HMSO).
8.
Cmnd. 4150 (1969), Report of the Royal Commission on Local Government in Scotland, (Wheatley), (London: HMSO).
9.
Cmnd. 4584 (1971), Reform of Local Government in England: Government Proposals for Reorganisation, (London: HMSO).
10.
Cmnd. 7457 (1979), Organic Change in Local Government, (London: HMSO).
11.
Cmnd. 8115 (1981), Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Local Government (Stoddart Report), (London: HMSO).
12.
Cmnd. 9063 (1983), Streamlining the Cities: Government Proposals for Reorganizing Local Government in Greater London and the Metropolitan Counties, (London: HMSO).
13.
Cmnd. 9216 (1984), Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Functions and Powers of the Island Councils in Scotland (Montgomery Report), (London: HMSO).
14.
Crossman, R. (1975), The Diaries of a Cabinet Minister, Volume One, Minister of Housing 1964-66, (London: Hamish Hamilton and Jonathan Cape).
15.
Dror, Y. (1968), Public Policymaking Reexamined, (Scranton, Pa: Chandler).
16.
Elcock, H. (1991), Change and Decay? Public Administration in the 1990s, (Harlow: Longman).
17.
Elcock, H. (1997), ‘Territorial debates about local government: or Don’t reorganise, don't, don't, don't!’ to be published in Elcock, H. and Keating, M. (forthcoming, 1998) The Devolution Agenda: What's wrong with asymmetrical government? (London: Frank Cass).
18.
Etzioni, A. (1967), ‘Mixed scanning: a “third” approach to decision-making’, Public Administration Review, 27-27.
19.
Flynn, N., Leach, S. and Vielba, C. (1985), Abolition or Reform? The GLC and the Metropolitan County Councils, (London: Allen and Unwin).
20.
Goldsmith, M. (ed.) (1986), Essays on the Future of Local Government, (Wakefield: West Yorkshire Metropolitan County Council).
21.
Gregory, R. (1989), ‘Political rationality or “incrementalism”? Charles E. Lindblom's enduring contribution to public policy making theory’, Policy and Politics, Vol. 17, No. 2.
22.
Ham, C. and Hill, M. (1984), The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State, (Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books Ltd).
23.
Heclo, H. and Wildavsky, A. (1981), The Private Government of Public Money, (London: Macmillan).
24.
Hill, M (ed.) (1993) The Policy Process: A Reader, (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
25.
Hogwood, B.W. and Gunn, L.A. (1984), Policy Analysis for the Real World, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
26.
Jones, G.W. (1973), ‘The Local Government Act 1972 and the Redcliffe-Maud Commission’, Political Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 2.
27.
Jordan, A.G. and Richardson, J. J. (1987), British Politics and the Policy Process, (London: Allen and Unwin).
28.
Leach, B. (1985), ‘The Government of the English Provincial Conurbations’, Local Government Studies, Vol 11, No 1, January/February 1985: 17-37.
29.
Leach, R. (1994), ‘Restructuring Local Government’, Local Government Studies, Vol. 20, No. 3: 345-360.
30.
Leach, S. (ed.) (1994), The Local Government Review: Key Issues and Choices, (Birmingham: INLOGOV).
31.
Leach, S., Davis, H. and Associates (1996), Enabling or Disabling Local Government: Choices for the Future, (Buckingham: Open University Press).
32.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959), ‘The science of muddling through’, Public Administration Review. 19.2: 79-88.
33.
Lindblom, C. E. (1965), The Intelligence of Democracy: Decision-making through mutual adjustment, (New York: Free Press).
34.
Lindblom, C. E. (1979), ‘Still muddling, not yet through’, Public Administration Review, 39.6: 517-526.
35.
The Local Government Commission for England (1993, December), Renewing Local Government in the English Shires: A Progress Report, (London: HMSO).
36.
The Local Government Commission for England (1995, March), Renewing Local Government in the English Shires: A Report on the 1992-1995 Structural Review, (London: HMSO).
37.
Marshall, F. (1978), Report to the Greater London Council by Sir Frank Marshall, (London: Greater London Council).
38.
Oakeshott, M. (1962), Rationalism in Politics and other essays, (London: Methuen).
39.
Parsons, W. (1995), Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis, (Aldershot: Edward Arnold).
40.
Popper, K.R. (1962), The Open Society and Its Enemies, two volumes, fourth edition, (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).
41.
Robson, W.A. (1966), Local Government in Crisis, (London: George Allen and Unwin).
42.
Richardson, J.J. and Jordan, A.G. (1979), Governing Under Pressure, (Oxford: Martin Robertson).
43.
Simon, H. (1947, second edition 1957, third edition, 1976), Administrative Behaviour, (New York: Free Press).
44.
Simon, H. (1960), The New Science of Management Decision, (Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall).
45.
Simon, H. (1983), Reason in Human Affairs, (Oxford: Blackwell).
46.
Smith, G. and May, D. (1980), ‘The artificial debate between rationalist and incrementalist models of decision making’, Policy and Politics, Vol. 8, No. 2: 147-161.
47.
Stanyer, J. (1996), The Political Economy of Local Government Structure, (Exeter: Rusel Working Paper No. 24, University of Exeter).
48.
Stewart, J. and Stoker, G. (Eds.) (1995), Local Government in the 1990s, (London: Macmillan).
49.
Wildavsky, A. (1974), The Politics of the Budgetary Process, second edition, (Boston: Little, Brown)
50.
Wilson, D. (1996), ‘The Local Government Commission: examining the consultative process’, Public Administration, Vol. 74, No. 2: 199-219.
51.
Wiseman, H.V. (Ed.) (1970), Local Government in England 1958-69, (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).
52.
Wood, B. (1976), The Process of Local Government Reform 1966-74, (London: Allen and Unwin).
