Research on governance often assumes that governance requires combinations of hierarchical, market and network co-ordination. However, governance versatility – understood as the existence of a repertoire of different modes of coordination – is not a characteristic of all instances of governance. The aim of this paper is to offer a more thorough analysis by exploring existing levels of governance versatility and how these are influenced by institutional profiles. Our comparative study of primary care performance across six jurisdictions suggests that higher levels of governance versatility can be shaped by very different institutional profiles. Our analysis raises important questions for future studies of governance versatility.
AshtonT (2015) Measuring health system performance: A new approach to accountability and quality improvement in New Zealand. Health Policy119: 999–1004.
BlankRHBurauVKuhlmannE (2018) Comparative Health Policy. 5th edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BodeIFirbankO (2009) Barriers to co-governance: Examining the “chemistry” of home-care networks in Germany, England, and Québec. Policy Studies Journal37: 325–351.
5.
BouckaertGPetersBGVerhoestK (2010) The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations. Shifting Patterns of Public Management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BrunnM (2020) Tools of power: Pay-for-performance in French and German health reforms. Journal of Health Organization and Management. DOI: 10.1108/JHOM–05–2020–0207
7.
BurauVClavierC (2018) Understanding gaps in the coexistence between different modes of governance: A case study of public health in schools in a multilevel system. Politics & Policy46: 604–629.
8.
BurauV (2016) Governing through professional experts. In: DentMBourgeaultIDenisJ-L, et al. (eds), Routledge Companion to the Professions and Professionalism. London: Routledge, pp. 91–101.
9.
BurauVWilsfordDFranceG (2009) Reforming medical governance in Europe. What is it about institutions?Health Economics, Policy and Law4: 265–281.
10.
BusseRBlümelM (2014). Germany: Health System Review. Health Systems in Transition16(2): 1–61.
11.
BusseRBlümelMKniepsF, et al. (2017) Statutory health insurance in Germany: A health system shaped by 135 years of solidarity, self-governance, and competition. The Lancet390(10097): 882–897.
12.
CashinC (2014) New Zealand: Primary health organization performance programme. In: CashinCChiYLSmithP, et al. (eds), Paying for Performance in Healthcare: Implications for Health System Performance and Accountability. New York: Open University Press.
13.
ChalmersLMAshtonTTenbenselT (2017) Measuring and managing health system performance: An update from New Zealand. Health Policy121: 831–835.
14.
Deloitte (2014) Kontrol og Opfølgning i Praksissektoren. København: Deloitte.
15.
DenisJ-LUsherSBakerGR, et al. (2017) Transcending the Paradigm Freeze: Narratives of Reform in Canadian Health Systems. Copenhagen: Denmark. Paper presented at the 33rd EGOS Colloquium 2017.
16.
DenisJ-LFerlieEGestelNV (2015) Understanding hybridity in public organizations. Public Administration93(2): 273–289.
17.
DwyerJLavoieJO’DonnellK, et al. (2011) Contracting for indigenous health care: Towards mutual accountability. Australian Journal of Public Administration70: 34–46.
18.
FordeINaderCSocha-DietrichK, et al. (2016) Primary Care. Review of Denmark. Paris: OECD.
19.
FosterMHenmanPGableA, et al. (2016) Population health performance as primary healthcare governance in Australia: Professionals and the politics of performance. Policy Studies37: 521–534.
20.
GagnéFSiroisJ (2016) La Rémunération des Médecins à travers le Monde. Québec: Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, Direction de la planification et des orientations stratégiques.
21.
GreveCEjersboN (2016) Denmark: Towards the neo-Weberian state in the digital area. In: HammerschmidGVan de WalleSAndrewsR, et al. (eds), Public Administration Reforms in Europe. The View from the Top. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 119–128.
22.
GroenewegenPPHeinemannSGreßS, et al. (2015) Primary care practice composition in 34 countries. Health Policy119(12): 1576–1583.
23.
HammerschmidGOprisorA (2016) German public administration: Incremental reform and a difficult terrain for management ideas and instruments. In: HammerschmidGVan de WalleSAndrewsR, et al. (eds), Public Administration Reforms in Europe. The View from the Top. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 63–72.
24.
HansenJKjellbergPKBuchMS, et al. (2010) Styring i Praksis. Erfaring fra de Danske Regioner. København: Dansk Sundhedsinstitut.
25.
HoodC (2000) The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
HougaardKL (2013) Styring og kontrol af almen praksis. Et studie af reformen af de danske praktiserende læger i 2013. Aarhus: Department of Political Science, Aarhus University.
27.
JacobsR, et al. (2006) Exploring the determinants of NHS performance ratings: lessions for performance assessment systems. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy11(4): 211–217.
28.
JessopB (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
29.
JessopB (2003) Governance and metagovernance: On reflexivity, requisite variety, and requisite irony. In: BangHP (ed), Governance, as Social and Political Communication. Manchester University Press, pp. 142–172.
30.
JilkeSvan der VoetJVan de WalleS (2016) Administrative reforms in the Netherlands: Managerialism, Collaboration and implications for future reform capacity. In: HammerschmidGVan de WalleSAndrewsR, et al. (eds), Public Administration Reforms in Europe. The View from the Top. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 73–82.
31.
KoppenjanJTermeerKKarréPM (2019) Comparing new hybrid governance arrangements. In: KoppenjanJTermeerKKarréPM (eds), Smart Hybridity: Potentials and Challenges of New Governance Arrangements. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, pp. 135–158.
32.
KringosD, et al. (2013) The strength of primary care in Europe: an international study. British Journal of General Practice63(616): e742–e750.
33.
KronemanMBoermaWvan den BergM, et al. (2016) Netherlands Health System Review. Health Systems in Transition18(2).
34.
KuhlmannEAllsopJ (2008) Professional self-regulation in a changing architecture of governance: Comparing health policy in the UK and Germany. Policy & Politics36(2): 173–189.
35.
LeixneringSMeyerREPolzerT (2020) Hybrid coordination of city organisations: The rule of people and culture in the shadow of structures. Urban Studies58(14): 2933–2955. DOI: 10.1177/0042098020963854
36.
LewisJ (2004) Partnerships, primary health care and health inequalities: problems and possibilities. Australian. Journal of Primary Health10(3): 38–45.
37.
LijphartA (2012) Patterns of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
LowiT (1972) Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review32(4): 298–310.
40.
LowndesVSkelcherC (1998) The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration76(2): 313–333.
41.
MahoneyJThelenK (eds), (2010) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
McDonaldRHarrisonSChecklandK (2008) Incentives and control in primary health care: Findings from English pay for performance case studies. Journal of Health Organization and Management22(1): 48–62.
43.
MeloenJGroenewegenPDelnoijD (2001) Meerjarenafspraken in de gezondheidszorg: nieuw besturingsmiddel in het Poldermodel?TSG79(4): 248–260.
44.
MeulemanL (2008) Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: The Feasibility of Designing and Managing Governance Style Combinations. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
45.
MüllerBSLeifermanMWilkeD, et al. (2016) Innovative Versorgungsmodelle in Deutschland – Erfolgsfaktoren, Barrieren und Übertragbarkeit. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen115/116: 49–55.
46.
NewmanJ (2001) Modernising Governance. New Labour, Policy and Society. London: Sage.
47.
Pahl-WostlC (2019) The role of governance modes and meta-governance in the transformation towards sustainable water governance. Environmental Science & Policy91: 6–16.
48.
PierreJPetersBG (2020) Governance, Politics and the State. Bloomsbury Publishing.
49.
PineaultRPrud’hommeAFiset-LanielJ, et al. (2016) Montreal’s health care system (Québec, Canada). Summary prepared for the conference Access to Health Services and Care Coordination in New York and Montreal, sponsored by the Délégation générale du Québec àNew York, March 2016.
50.
PLO (2017) PLO Faktaark 2017. Copenhagen: PLO.
51.
PollittCBouckaertG (2017) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – into the Age of Austerity. fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
PomeyMPMartinEForestP-G (2009) Québec’s family medicine groups: Innovation and compromise in the reform of front-line care. Canadian Political Science Review3(4): 31–46.
53.
PowellW (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organisation. In: ThompsonGFrancesJLevacicR, et al. (eds), Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Co-ordination of Social Life. London: Sage, pp. 265–276.
54.
Quesnel-ValléeACarterR (2018) Improving accessibility to services and increasing effciency through merger and centralization in Québec. Health Reform Observer – Observatoire des Réformes de Santé6(1). Article 2 DOI: 10.13162/hro-ors.v6i1.3216
55.
RhodesRA (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
56.
RichardsonJ (2012) Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: Routledge.
57.
RLTN (Regionernes Lønnings- og takstnævn) (2017) Aftale om Almen Praksis. Copenhagen: RTLN.
58.
SibthorpeBGardnerK (2007) A conceptual framework for performance assessment in primary health care. Australian Journal of Primary Health13: 96–103.
59.
SmithV (2015) Pay for Performance in Primary Health Care: A Comparative Study of Health Policymaking in England and New Zealand. New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington.
60.
TenbenselT (2008) How do governments steer health policy? A comparison of Canadian and New Zealand approaches to cost-control and primary health care reform. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis10(4): 347–363.
61.
TenbenselTAshtonT (2020) New Zealand’s healthcare system: Rapid reform and incremental change. In: OkmaKTenbenselT (eds), Health Reforms across the World: The Experience of Twelve Small and Medium Sized Nations with Changing Their Healthcare Systems. Singapore: World Scientific Press.
62.
TenbenselTBurauV (2017) Contrasting approaches to primary care performance governance in Denmark and New Zealand. Health Policy121: 853–861.
63.
TenbenselTMaysNCummingJ (2011) A successful mix of hierarchy and collaboration? Interpreting the 2001 reform of the governance of the New Zealand public health system. Policy and Politics39(2): 239–255.
64.
TenbenselTMillerFBretonM, et al. (2017) How do policy and institutional settings shape opportunities for community-based primary health care? A comparison of Ontario, Québec and New Zealand. International Journal of Integrated Care17(2): 13. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2514
65.
TenbenselTSilwalPRWaltonL, et al. (2021) New Zealand’s integration-based policy for driving local health system improvement – which conditions underpin more successful implementation?International Journal of Integrated Care21(2): 8–12. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5602
66.
TuohyCH (1999) Accidental Logics: The Dynamics of Change in the Health Care Arena in the United States, Britain and Canada. New York: Oxford University Press.
67.
Van De BovenkampHMde MulMQuartzJGU, et al. (2013) Institutional layering in governing healthcare quality. Public Administration92(1): 208–223.
68.
VrangbækK (2009) The interplay between central and sub-central levels: The development of a systemic standard based programme for governing medical performance in Denmark. Health Economics, Policy and Law4(3): 305–327.
69.
WeaverRKRockmanB (eds), (1993) Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. Washington: Brookings Institute.
70.
YanowD (2014) Intepretive analysis and comparative research. In: EngeliIAllisonCR (eds), Comparative Policy Studies. Conceptual and Methodological Challenges. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
71.
YinRK (2018) Case Study Research and Applications. Design and Methods. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles: Sage.
