Causal mechanisms have received significant attention within the social sciences, and policy design and implementation occupy a prominent place in public policymaking. However, one area that has not received much attention in this literature is the causal mechanisms that are able to link policy instruments with outcomes due to operating within the appropriate contexts. This article seeks to fill this gap in the literature. Drawing on realistic evaluation and comparative historical institutionalism, and an exploratory case study on macroprudential regulation in Turkey between June 2011 and September 2016, this article argues that the success of macroprudential instruments in securing of macrofinancial stability is most likely when they trigger causal mechanisms that operate within the appropriate contexts.
AkkayaYGurkaynakR (2012) Cari açık, bütçe dengesi, finansal istikrar ve para politikası: Heyecanlı bir dönemin izi [Current account deficit, budget balanca, financial stability and monetary policy: Trace of an exciting era]. Iktisat Isletme ve Finans27(315): 93–119.
2.
AkyüzYBoratavK (2003) The making of the Turkish financial crisis. World Development31(9): 1549–1566.
3.
Alioğulları Z, Başkaya Y, Bulut Y, et al. (2015) Türkiye’de tüketici ve ticari kredilerin cari açıkla ilişkisi [The Linkage Between Consumer and Credit Card Loans, and Current Account Deficit]. Ankara, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey: CBT Research Notes in Economics 15/19.
4.
Alper K, Kara H and Yörükoğlu M (2013) Alternative Tools to Manage Capital Flow Volatility. Basel, BIS: BIS papers 73.
5.
AndersonPJJBlattRChristiansonMS, et al. (2006) Understanding mechanisms in organisational research: Reflections from a collective journey. Journal of Management Inquiry15: 102–113.
6.
Arslan Y, Kabas G and Taskin AA (2015) Quantifying the Effects of Loan-to-Value Restrictions: Evidence from Turkey. Working papers 1535. Ankara: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
7.
Aysan AF, Fendoglu S and Kilinc M (2014) Managing Short-Term Capital Flows in New Central Banking: Unconventional Monetary Policy Framework in Turkey. Eurasian Economic Review 4(1): 45–69.
8.
Baker A (2013) The new political economy of the macroprudential ideational shift. New Political Economy 18(1): 112–139.
9.
BakirC (2006) Governance by supranational interdependence: Domestic policy change in the Turkish financial services industry. In: BattenJKearneyC (eds) Emerging European Financial Markets: Independence and Integration Post-Enlargement, London: Elsevier, pp. 179–211.
10.
BakirC (2009) Wobbling but still on its feet: Turkish economy in global financial crisis. South European Society and Politics14(1): 71–85.
11.
BakirC (2013) Bank Behaviour and Resilience: The Effects of Structures, Institutions and Agents, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
Bakir C (2017) How can interactions among interdependent structures, institutions, and agents inform financial stability? What we have still to learn from global financial crisis. Policy Sciences 50(2): 217–239.
13.
Bakir C (2019) How do mega-bank merger policy and regulations contribute to financial stability? Evidence from Australia and Canada. Journal of Economic Policy Reform 22(1): 1–15.
14.
BakirCCobanK (2018) Policy analysis in the Central Bank. In: BakirCErtanG (eds) Policy Analysis in Turkey, Bristol: University of Bristol Policy Press, pp. 215–233.
15.
BakirCJarvisD (2017) Contextualising the context in policy entrepreneurship and institutional change. Policy and Society36(4): 465–478.
16.
BakirCOnisZ (2010) The emergence and the limits of the regulatory state: The political economy of Turkish banking reforms in the age of post-Washington consensus. Development and Change41(1): 77–106.
17.
Bankalar B (2018) Bankalarimiz 2017. Istanbul: G. M. Matbaacilik ve Ticaret A.S.
18.
BennettACheckelJT (2015) Process tracing: From philosophical roots to best practices. In: BennettACheckelJT (eds) Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–37.
19.
BhaskarR (1979) The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, Brighton: Harvester Press.
20.
BhaskarR (2008) A Realist Theory of Science, 2nd ed. London: Verso .
21.
BütheT (2002) Taking temporality seriously: Modeling history and the use of narratives as evidence. American Political Science Review96(3): 481–493.
22.
Capano G and Howlett M (forthcoming) Causal logics and mechanisms in policy design: How and why adopting a mechanistic perspective can improve policy design. Public Policy and Administration.
23.
CapocciaG (2016) Critical junctures. In: FioretosOFalletiTGSheingateA (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–179. .
Dalkin SM, Greenhalgh J, Jones D, et al. (2015) What's in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implementation Science 10(49): 1–7.
27.
DavisGMarquisC (2005) Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century. Organization Science16(4): 332–343.
28.
Değerli A and Fendoğlu S (2013) Döviz kuru beklentileri ve TCMB para politikası [Foreign Exchange Expectations and Monetary Policy of the CBRT]. CBT Research Notes in Economics, no. 13/02. Ankara: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
29.
EkstromM (1992) Causal explanation of social action: The contribution of Max Weber and of critical realism to a generative view of causal explanation in the social sciences. Acta Sociologica35(2): 107–122.
30.
FalletiTGLynchJF (2009) Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis. Comparative Political Studies42(9): 1143–1166.
31.
Financial Times (2014) How debt threatens Turkey's economy. Financial Times, 6 May.
Galati G and Moessner R (2017) What do we know about the effects of macroprudential policy? Economica 85(October): 1–37.
34.
Garcia-Escribano M and Han F (2015) Credit Expansion in Emerging Markets: Propeller of Growth? IMF working paper 15(22). Washington, DC: IMF.
35.
GerringJ (2008) The mechanismic worldview: Thinking inside the box. British Journal of Political Science38: 161–179.
36.
GerringJ (2010) Causal mechanisms: Yes, but…. Comparative Political Studies43(11): 1499–1526.
37.
HayC (2016) Process tracing: A laudable aim or a high-tariff methodology?New Political Economy21(5): 500–504.
38.
HedströmP (2005) Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
HedströmPBearmanP (2009) The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
HedströmPSwedbergR (1998) Social mechanisms: An introductory essay. In: HedströmPSwedbergR (eds) Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–31.
41.
HedströmPYlikoskiP (2010) Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology36: 49–67.
42.
HoodC (1986) The Tools of Government, Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.
43.
HowlettM (2009) Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences42(1): 73–79.
44.
HowlettM (2011) Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments, London: Routledge.
45.
HowlettM (2014) From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: Design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences47(3): 187–207.
46.
HowlettMLejanoR (2013) Tales from the crypt: The rise and fall (and re-birth?) of policy design studies. Administration and Society45(3): 356–380.
47.
HowlettMMukherjeeJWooJ (2015) From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: The new design orientation towards policy formulation research. Policy and Politics43(2): 291–311.
48.
IMF (2011) Recent Experiences in Managing Capital Inflows – Cross-Cutting Themes and Possible Policy Framework, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
49.
IMF (2014) Turkey. IMF Country Report No. 14/329. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
50.
IMF (2015) Credit Expansion in Emerging Markets: Propeller of Growth? WP/15/212. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
51.
IMF (2017) Increasing Resilience to Large and Volatile Capital Flows: The Role of Macroprudential Policies – Case Studies. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
52.
IMF-FSB-BIS (2016) Elements of effective macroprudential policies: Lessons from international experience. IMF, FSB and BIS joint report, 31 August. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/np/g20/pdf/2016/083116.pdf (accessed 10 November 2017).
Kara H (2012) Monetary Policy in Turkey after the Global Crisis. Working paper 12(17). Ankara: CBRT.
55.
Kara H (2016) Turkey’s Experience with Macroprudential Policy. BIS Papers 86. Basle: BIS.
56.
KryzanowskiLZhangJZhongR (2017) Cross national correlations and quantitative easing. Finance Research Letters20: 13–21.
57.
LittleD (2012) Explanatory autonomy and Coleman's boat THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia27(2): 137–151.
58.
Lord N (2011) Turkey: Bankers and state collide on reserve ratios. Euromoney, 4 May.
59.
MahoneyJ (2001) Beyond correlational analysis: Recent innovations in theory and method. Sociological Forum16(3): 575–593.
60.
MayntzR (2004) Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences34(2): 237–259.
61.
MayntzR (2016) Process tracing, abstraction, and varieties of cognitive interest. New Political Economy21(5): 484–488.
62.
Ozdemir O (2017) 15 Temmuz darbe girişimi: Türkiye ekonomisinin kısa süren ‘kötü rüyası’. [July 17 coup attempt: Short-lived bad dream of the Turkish Economy]. BBC Turkce. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-40441632 (accessed 10 October 2017).
63.
Ozkan C (2014) Turkiye'de kredi karti kullanici profili ve davranisi analizi. [The profile of credit card users and the analysis of their behavior]. Unpublished Thesis, CBRT, Turkey.
64.
PawsonR (2006) Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective, London: Sage.
65.
PawsonRGreenhalghTHarveyG, et al. (2005) Realist review – A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health and Services Research and Policy10(1): 21–34.
Yagci M (2017) Institutional entrepreneurship and organisational learning: financial stability policy design in Turkey. Policy and Society 36(4): 539–555.
78.
Yin RK (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
79.
YoungK (2014) Losing abroad but winning at home: European financial industry groups in global financial governance since the crisis. Journal of European Public Policy21(3): 367–388.
