In most industrialized countries, politicians and policy makers face unprecedented levels of fiscal pressure. Such pressure has compelled governments to conduct substantial cuts in government spending and services. While policy makers have attempted to build a strong civil society to compensate for the declining government role, previous studies have not examined the link between government retrenchment and citizen involvement in volunteering. This study examines such a relationship by conducting a cross-national study of OECD countries. After controlling for individual- and country-level factors, the findings show that government retrenchment is positively associated with citizen volunteering.
Bailey SJ (2016) Public policy and administration in an era of austerity: Rethinking local public services. In: Klassen TR, Cepiku D, and Lah TJ (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Global Public Policy and Administration. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.68–79.
2.
BaileySJValkamaPSalonenS (2014) The EU’s public finance crisis: Causes, consequences and cure. Public Money & Management34(2): 83–90.
3.
BartelsKPRCozziGMantovanN (2013) “The Big Society,” Public Expenditure, and Volunteering. Public Administration Review73(2): 340–351.
CampbellAL (2002) Self-interest, social security, and the distinctive participation patterns of senior citizens. American Political Science Review96(3): 565–574.
6.
CampbellAL (2003) Participatory reactions to policy threats: Senior citizens and the defense of Social Security and Medicare. Political Behavior25(1): 29–49.
7.
CampbellAL (2012) Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science15: 333–351.
8.
DahlbergL (2005) Interaction between voluntary and statutory social service provision in Sweden: A matter of welfare pluralism, substitution or complementarity?Social Policy & Administration39(7): 740–763.
9.
DalyS (2011) Philanthropy, the big society and emerging philanthropic relationships in the UK. Public Management Review13(8): 1077–1094.
10.
DayKMDevlinRA (1996) Volunteerism and crowding out: Canadian econometric evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics29(1): 37–53.
11.
European Values Study Group and World Values Survey Association (2006) European and world values surveys four-wave integrated data file, 1981–2004, v.20060423.
12.
EVS (2015) European Values Study Longitudinal Data File 1981–2008 (EVS 1981–2008). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4804 Data file Version 3.0.0.
13.
FarmerJHillCMuñozSA (2012) Community co-production: Social enterprise in remote and rural communities, Edward Elgar Publishing.
14.
Finsveen EM and van Oorschot W (2007) How does the welfare state affect social capital? A literature study. Paper prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions. Workshop Social Capital, the State and Diversity, Helsinki.
15.
FotakiM (2015) Co-production under the financial crisis and austerity: A means of democratizing public services or a race to the bottom?Journal of Management Inquiry24(4): 433–438.
16.
FukuyamaF (2001) Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly22(1): 7–20.
17.
FyfeNR (2005) Making space for “neo-communitarianism”? The third sector, state and civil society in the UK. Antipode37(3): 536–557.
18.
GelissenJPTMvan OorschotWJHFinsveenE (2012) How does the welfare state influence individuals’ social capital? Eurobarometer evidence on individuals’ access to informal help. European Societies14(3): 416–440.
19.
GigerN (2011) Is social policy retrenchment unpopular? How welfare reforms affect government popularity. European Sociological Review28(5): 691–700.
20.
Giger N and Nelson M (2012) The welfare state or the economy? Preferences, constituencies, and strategies for retrenchment. European Sociological Review 29(5): 1083–1094.
21.
GundelachBFreitagMStadelmann-SteffenI (2010) Making or breaking informal volunteering: Welfare statism and social capital in a sub-national comparative perspective. European Societies12(5): 627–652.
22.
HacklFHallaMPrucknerGJ (2012) Volunteering and the state. Public Choice151(3–4): 465–495.
23.
HowardMMGilbertL (2008) A cross-national comparison of the internal effects of participation in voluntary organizations. Political Studies56(1): 12–32.
LodgeMHoodC (2012) Into an age of multiple austerities? Public management and public service bargains across OECD countries. Governance25(1): 79–101.
28.
LowndesVPratchettL (2012) Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the ‘Big Society’. Local Government Studies38(1): 21–40.
29.
MacLeanLM (2011) State retrenchment and the exercise of citizenship in Africa. Comparative Political Studies44(9): 1238–1266.
30.
MarschallMJ (2004) Citizen participation and the neighborhood context: A new look at the coproduction of local public goods. Political Research Quarterly57(2): 231–244.
31.
Martinelli F (2017) Social services disrupted. Changing supply landscapes, impacts and policy options. In: Social Services Disrupted. Changes, Challenges and Policy Implications for Europe in Times of Austerity. pp.391–410.
32.
MettlerS (2002) Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the GI Bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review96(2): 351–365.
33.
MettlerS (2007) Bringing government back into civic engagement: Considering the role of public policy. International Journal of Public Administration30(6–7): 643–650.
34.
MettlerSSossJ (2004) The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics2(1): 55–73.
35.
MettlerSWelchE (2004) Civic generation: Policy feedback effects of the GI Bill on political involvement over the life course. British Journal of Political Science34(3): 497–518.
Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism (2009) Aratana yui ni yoru chiiki kassei ka. [Local revitalization through new cooperatives]. Available at: www.mlit.go.jp/common/000039139.pdf.
Muñoz J, Rico G and Anduiza E (2014) Empowering cuts? Austerity policies and political involvement in Spain. In: Kumlin S and Stadelmann-Steffen I (eds) How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.19–40.
40.
Northern Periphery Programme (2013) O4O: Older people for older people. Final report.
41.
OECD (2010) Strategies to Improve Rural Service Delivery, OECD Rural Policy Reviews, Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264083967-en.
42.
OECD (2011) Restoring public finances. In: Special Issue of the OECD Journal on Budgeting. Paris: OECD Publishing.
43.
OECD (2015) OECD Statistics.
44.
PeckJ (2014) Pushing austerity: State failure, municipal bankruptcy and the crises of fiscal federalism in the USA. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society7(1): 17–44.
45.
PiersonP (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
PiersonP (1996) The New Politics of the Welfare State. World Politics48(2): 143–179.
47.
Ponticelli J and Voth HJ (2011) Austerity and anarchy: Budget cuts and social unrest in Europe, 1919–2008. Available at SSRN 1899287.
RaudlaRDouglasJWRandma-LiivT, et al. (2015a) The impact of fiscal crisis on decision-making processes in European governments: Dynamics of a centralization cascade. Public Administration Review75(6): 842–852.
50.
RaudlaRDouglasJWSaviR, et al. (2017) Fiscal crisis and expenditure cuts: The influence of public management practices on cutback strategies in Europe. The American Review of Public Administration47(3): 376–394.
51.
RaudlaRSaviRRandma-LiivT (2015b) Cutback management literature in the 1970s and 1980s: Taking stock. International Review of Administrative Sciences81(3): 433–456.
52.
Sabatinelli S and Semprebon M (2017) The vertical division of responsibility for social services within and beyond the State: Issues in empowerment, participation and territorial cohesion. In: Martinelli F, Anttonen, A and Mätzke M (eds) Social Services Disrupted: Changes, Challenges and Policy Implications for Europe in Times of Austerity, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 114–133.
53.
Salamon LM and Sokolowski SW (2003) Institutional Roots of Volunteering. In: Dekker P and Halman L (eds) The Values of Volunteering. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies (An International Multidisciplinary Series). Boston, MA: Springer.
54.
SchoferEFourcade-GourinchasM (2001) The structural contexts of civic engagement: Voluntary association membership in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review66(6): 806–828.
55.
ScorsoneEAPlerhoplesC (2010) Fiscal stress and cutback management amongst state and local governments: What have we learned and what remains to be learned?State and Local Government Review42(2): 176–187.
56.
SimmonsWOEmanueleR (2004) Does government spending crowd out donations of time and money?Public Finance Review32(5): 498–511.
57.
SossJSchramSF (2007) A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American Political Science Review101(1): 111–127.
58.
Sotiropoulos DA and Bourikos D (2014) Economic crisis, social solidarity and the voluntary sector in Greece. Journal of Power, Politics & Governance 2(2): 33–53.
59.
Stadelmann-SteffenI (2011) Social volunteering in welfare states: Where crowding out should occur. Political Studies59(1): 135–155.
60.
SuzukiK (2017) Government expenditure cuts and voluntary activities of citizens: The experience of Japanese municipalities. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration39(4): 258–275.
61.
Van OorschotWArtsW (2005) The social capital of European welfare states: The crowding out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy15(1): 5–26.
62.
WemlingerEBerlanMR (2016) Does gender equality influence volunteerism? A cross-national analysis of women’s volunteering habits and gender equality. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations27(2): 853–873.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
