Designing policies in uncertain contexts: Entrepreneurial capacity and the case of the European Emission Trading Scheme

Abstract

The paper focuses on enterprising agents in policy formulation and design by looking at their capacity of dealing with different levels of uncertainty. In climate policy specifically, different degrees and types of uncertainties pose a challenge to policymakers. Policy entrepreneurs and the combination of their analytical, operational and political competences are a relevant component in reducing ambiguity in policy design and translating broad policy goals to operational programmes and specific policy instruments. Using the case of the European Emission Trading Scheme, we suggest that the success of policy entrepreneurs in catalysing policy change is determined by their capacity to work against multiple kinds of uncertainty. This ‘uncertainty mitigating’ capacity on the part of policy entrepreneurs rests significantly on balancing managerial expertise and political acumen. We conclude that entrepreneurial capacity goes beyond current definitions in the literature, involving the balance among analytical, operational and political competences to navigate a politicized policy context.

Keywords

Climate change European Emission Trading Scheme policy capacity policy entrepreneurial capacity policy entrepreneurs uncertainty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackrill

Kay

(2011) Multiple streams in EU policy-making: The case of the 2005 sugar reform. Journal of European Public Policy 18(1): 72–89.

Ackrill

Kay

Zahariadis

(2013) Ambiguity, multiple streams, and EU policy. Journal of European Public Policy 20(6): 871–887.

Balla

(2001) Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations. American Politics Research 29: 221–45.

Bausch

Benjamin

Michael

(2016) Ambitious climate policy through centralization? Evidence from the European Union. Climate Policy 17(1): S32–S50.

Béland

(2016) Kingdon reconsidered: Ideas, interests and institutions in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 18(3): 228–242.

Béland

Howlett

(2016) The role and impact of the multiple-streams approach in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 18(3): 221–227.

Bernstein

Betsill

Hoffmann

et al. (2010) A tale of two Copenhagens: Carbon markets and climate governance, millennium. Journal of International Studies 39(1): 161–173.

Betz

Sato

(2006) Emissions trading: Lessons learnt from the 1st phase of the EU ETS and prospects for the 2nd phase. Climate Policy 6(4): 351–359.

Blind PK (2006) Building trust in government in the twenty-first century: Review of literature and emerging issues. In: Seventh global forum on reinventing government building trust in government, 26–29 June 2007, Vienna, Austria. New York: UNDESA, pp. 1–31.

10.

Braun

(2009) The evolution of emissions trading in the European Union – The role of policy networks, knowledge and policy entrepreneurs, accounting. Organizations and Society 34: 469–487.

11.

Cairney

(2013) What is evolutionary theory and how does it inform policy studies? Policy and Politics 41(2): 279–298.

12.

Cairney

Jones

(2016) Kingdon’s multiple streams approach: What is the empirical impact of this universal theory? Policy Studies Journal 44(1): 37–58.

13.

Chandreyee B and Velten E (2014) The EU emissions trading system: Regulating the environment in the EU, climate policy info hub. Available at: http://climatepolicyinfohub.eu/eu-emissions-trading-system-introduction (accessed 20 April 2017).

14.

Christiansen

Wettestad

(2003) The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: How did it happen and will the EU succeed? Climate Policy 3(1): 3–18.

15.

Colebatch HK, Hoppe R, Noordegraaf M (eds) (2011) Working for Policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

16.

Corbett

(2005) Universities and the Europe of Knowledge: Ideas, Institutions and Policy Entrepreneurship in European Union Higher Education Policy, 1955–2005, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

17.

Del Rio

Silvosa

Gomez

(2011) Policies and design elements for the repowering of wind farms: A qualitative analysis of different options. Energy Policy 39(4): 1897–1908.

18.

Doern

Phidd

(1983) Canadian Public Policy: Ideas, Structure, Process, Methuen: Nelson Thomson Learning.

19.

Dunlop

(2015) Organizational political capacity as learning. Policy and Society 34(3): 259–270.

20.

Egenhofer

(2007) The making of the EU emissions trading scheme: Status, prospects and implications for business. European Management Journal 25(6): 453–463.

21.

Ellerman

Buchner

Carraro

(2011) The EU ETS allocation process: An overview. In: Ellerman

Buchner

Carraro

(eds) Allocation in the European Emissions Trading Scheme: Rights, Rents and Fairness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–12.

22.

Ellerman

Marcantonini

Zaklan

(2016) The European union emissions trading system: Ten years and counting. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 10(1): 89–107.

23.

Engau

Hoffmann

(2009) Effects of regulatory uncertainty on corporate strategy – An analysis of firms’ responses to uncertainty about post-Kyoto policy. Environmental Science and Policy 12(7): 766–777.

24.

European Commission (EC) (1998) Climate change – Towards an EU post-Kyoto strategy. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:51998DC0353&from=EN (accessed 23 September 2015).

25.

European Commission (EC) (2000) Green Paper on greenhouse gas emissions trading within the European Union, COM (2000) 87 final. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52000DC0087 (accessed 1 September 2017).

26.

European Commission (EC) (2001) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, COM (2001) 581 final. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52001PC0581 (accessed 1 September 2017).

27.

European Commission (EC) (2013) Expert meeting on EU ETS structural reform: Introduction of a market stability reserve. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/docs/0094/agenda_en.pdf (accessed 22 April 2017).

28.

European Commission (EC) (2014) Progress towards achieving the Kyoto and EU 2020 objectives, COM (2014) 689 final. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:eb290b32-5e8e-11e4-9cbe-01aa75ed71a1.0019.03/DOC_1&format=PDF (accessed 23 July 2015).

29.

European Commission (EC) (2015) Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council amending directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments, COM (2015) 337 final. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:33f82bac-2bc2-11e5-9f85-01aa75ed71a1.0024.02/DOC_1&format=PDF (accessed 20 April 2017).

30.

European Commission (EC) (2017) Report on the functioning of the European Carbon Market, COM (2017) 48 final. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/report-eu-carbon-market_en.pdf (accessed 20 April 2017).

31.

European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) (2014) Briefing: Reform of the EU Carbon Market, from backloading to the market stability reserve, European Parliament, PE 538.951. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2014/538951/EPRS_BRI(2014)538951_REV1_EN.pdf (accessed 20 April 2017).

32.

European Union (EU) (2014) Informal meeting of EU Environment Ministers and Informal Joint Meeting of EU Environment and Labour Ministers, Italian Presidency of the Council of the European Union. Available at: http://italia2014.eu/media/1598/informal-env-and-labourplusenv-meetings-presidency-summary.pdf (accessed 22 April 2017).

33.

Gleeson D, Legge D, O’Neill D, et al. (2011) Negotiating tensions in developing organizational policy capacity: Comparative lessons to be drawn. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 13: 237–263.

34.

Grabosky

(1995) Counterproductive regulation. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 23: 347–369.

35.

Gunningham

Grabosky

Sinclair

(1998) Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

36.

Head

(2008) Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration 67: 1–11.

37.

HM Revenue and Customs (UK) (2017) Excise Notice CCL1/6: a guide to carbon price floor. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/excise-notice-ccl16-a-guide-to-carbon-price-floor/excise-notice-ccl16-a-guide-to-carbon-price-floor (accessed 20 April 2017).

38.

Hoffmann

Trautmann

Schneider

(2008) A taxonomy for regulatory uncertainty—application to the European Emission Trading Scheme. Environmental Science and Policy 11: 712–722.

39.

Howlett

(2009) Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration 52(2): 153–175.

40.

Howlett

Mukherjee

Rayner

(2014) The elements of effective program design: A two-level analysis. Politics and Governance 2(2): 1–12.

41.

Howlett

Ramesh

(2015a) The two orders of governance failure: Design mismatches and policy capacity issues in modern governance. Policy and Society 33(4): 317–327.

42.

Howlett

Ramesh

(2015b) Achilles’ heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regulation & Governance 10(4): 301–313.

43.

Howlett

Rayner

(2013) Patching vs. packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design. Politics and Governance 1(2): 170–182.

44.

Jones

Peterson

Pierce

et al. (2016) A river runs through it: A multiple streams meta-review. Policy Studies Journal 44(1): 13–36.

45.

Kingdon

(1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company.

46.

Knopf B and Edenhofer O (2014) Save the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Set a price band. Energy Post, 21 October 2014. Available at: http://www.energypost.eu/eu-emissions-trading-scheme-can-saved-price-band/ (accessed 23 September 2015).

47.

Krukowska E (2015) EU carbon market emissions fall most in 5 years on mild weather, Bloomberg business, 1 April 2015. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-04-01/eu-carbon-market-emissions-fall-most-in-5-years-on-mild-weather (accessed 20 September 2015).

48.

Laing T, Sato M, Grubb M, et al. (2013) Assessing the effectiveness of the EU Emissions Trading System, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 126. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper No. 106. Available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/WP106-effectiveness-eu-emissions-trading-system.pdf (accessed 20 September 2015).

49.

Little

(2012) Political action, error and failure: The epistemological limits of complexity. Political Studies 60(1): 3–19.

50.

McConnell

(2010a) Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

51.

McConnell

(2010b) Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between. Journal of Public Policy 30(3): 345–362.

52.

Milliken

(1987) Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review 12(1): 133–143.

53.

Mintrom

Norman

(2009) Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal 37(4): 649–667.

54.

Mukherjee

Howlett

(2016) An Asian perspective on policy instruments: Policy styles, governance modes and critical capacity challenges. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 38(1): 24–42.

55.

Neslen A (2015) European carbon market reform set for 2019, The Guardian, 24 February 2015. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/24/european-carbon-emissions-trading-market-reform-set-for-2019 (accessed 22 September 2015).

56.

Ostrom

Basurto

(2011) Crafting analytical tools to study institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics 7(3): 317–343.

57.

Palmer

(2015) How do policy entrepreneurs influence policy change? Framing and boundary work in EU transport biofuels policy. Environmental Politics 24(2): 270–287.

58.

Parsons

(2007) How to Map Arguments in Political Science, Oxford University Press.

59.

Rabe B (2004) Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Stealth Politics of America Climate Change Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

60.

Radaelli

Dunlop

(2013) Learning in the European Union: Theoretical lenses and meta-theory. Journal of European Public Policy 20(6): 923–940.

61.

Rotberg

(2014) Good governance means performance and results. Governance 27(3): 511–518.

62.

Saikku

Soimakallio

(2008) Top-down approaches for sharing GHG emission reductions: uncertainties and sensitivities in the 27 European Union Member States. Environmental Science and Policy 11: 723–734.

63.

Skjærseth

Wettestad

(2010) Making the EU emissions trading system: The European Commission as an entrepreneurial epistemic leader. Global Environmental Change 20: 314–321.

64.

Taeihagh

Bañares-Alcántara

Givoni

(2013) A virtual environment for the formulation of policy packages. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 60(2014): 53–68.

65.

Taschini L, Dietz S and Hicks N (2013) Carbon tax v cap-and-trade: which is better? The Guardian, 31 January 2013. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/jan/31/carbon-tax-cap-and-trade (accessed 23 September 2015).

66.

Tenbensel T (2008) The role of evidence in policy: How the mix matters. In: International Research Society for Public Management, 26–28 March 2008. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology, pp. 1–16.

67.

The Economist (2013) ETS, RIP? The failure to reform Europe’s carbon market will reverberate round the world, The Economist, 20 April 2013. Available at: http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21576388-failure-reform-europes-carbon-market-will-reverberate-round-world-ets (accessed 21 July 2015).

68.

Thelen

(2003) How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In: Mahoney

Rueschemeyer

(eds) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–240.

69.

Tiernan A and Wanna J (2006) Competence, capacity, capability: towards conceptual clarity in the discourse of declining policy skills. In: The Govnet international conference, 2006, Canberra: Australian National University.

70.

Tinbergen

(1952) On the Theory of Economic Policy, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

71.

Underdal

(1991) Solving collective problems: Notes on three modes of leadership. Challenges of a Changing World, Festschrift to Willy Østreng, Lysaker: Fridtjof Nansen Institute, pp. 139–153.

72.

Van der Heijden

(2011) Institutional layering: A review of the use of the concept. Politics 31(1): 9–18.

73.

Walker

Marchau

VAWJ

(2004) Dealing with uncertainty in policy analysis and policymaking. Integrated Assessment 4(1): 1–4.

74.

Weaver

(2014) Compliance regimes and barriers to behavioral change. Governance 27(2): 243–265.

75.

Wellstead

Stedman

Howlett

(2011) Policy analytical capacity in changing governance contexts: A structural equation model (SEM) study of contemporary Canadian policy work. Public Policy and Administration 26(3): 353–373.

76.

Wettestad J, Eikeland PO and Nilsson M (2012) EU climate and energy policy: A hesitant supranational turn? Global Environmental Politics 12: 67–86.

77.

Wettestad

(2005) The making of the 2003 EU emissions trading directive: An ultra-quick process due to entrepreneurial proficiency? Global Environmental Politics 5(1): 1–23.

78.

Wilkinson

(2011) Organised chaos: An interpretive approach to evidence-based policy making in Defra. Political Studies 59(4): 959–977.

79.

Ramesh

Howlett

(2015) Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society 34(3): 165–171.

80.

Young

(1991) Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization 45: 281–308.

81.

Zapfel P and Vainio M (2002) Pathways to European Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading History and Misconceptions.. FEEM Working Paper, No. 85, Milan 2002.