The increasing availability of statistical data raises opportunities for ‘big’ data and learning analytics. Here, we review the academic literature and research relating to the use of big data analytics in the public sector, and its contribution to public organizations’ performance and efficiency. We outline the advantages as well as the limitations of using big data in public sector organizations and identify research gaps in recent studies and interesting areas for future research.
AgostinoDArnaboldiM (2017) Social media data used in the measurement of public service effectiveness: Empirical evidence from Twitter in higher education institutions. Public Policy and Administration. Epub ahead of print 18 December 2016. DOI:10.1177/0952076716682369.
2.
AndrewsRW (2011) Social capital and public service performance: A review of the evidence. Public Policy and Administration27(1): 49–67.
3.
AndrewsRBoyneGAMoonMJet al. (2010) Assessing organizational performance: Exploring differences between internal and external measures. International Public Management Journal13(2): 105–129.
4.
AsatryanZDe WitteK (2015) Direct democracy and local government efficiency. European Journal of Political Economy39: 58–66.
5.
BertotJCJaegerPT (2008) The E-Government paradox: Better customer service doesn't necessarily cost less. Government Information Quarterly25(2): 149–154.
6.
BertotJCJaegerPTGrimesJM (2010) Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly27(3): 264–271.
7.
BertotJCJaegerPTHansenD (2012) The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly29(1): 30–40.
8.
BonsónERoyoSRatkaiM (2015) Citizens' engagement on local governments' Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe. Government Information Quarterly32(1): 52–62.
9.
BoydDCrawfordK (2012) Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication and Society15(5): 662–679.
10.
BrownBChuiMManyikaJ (2011) Are you ready for the era of ‘big data’. McKinsey Quarterly4: 24–35.
11.
BrynjolfssonEMcAfeeA (2012) Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review90(10): 60–68.
12.
ChangRMKauffmanRJKwonY (2014) Understanding the paradigm shift to computational social science in the presence of big data. Decision Support Systems63: 67–80.
13.
ChenHChiangRHStoreyVC (2012) Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly36(4): 1165–1188.
14.
ChenCPZhangCY (2014) Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: A survey on big data. Information Sciences275: 314–347.
15.
CherchyeLDe WitteKOogheEet al. (2010) Equity and efficiency in private and public education: A nonparametric comparison. European Journal of Operational Research202(2): 563–573.
16.
Cherchye L, De Witte K and Perelman S (2015) A unified productivity-performance approach, with an application to secondary schools in the Netherlands. CES Working Paper Series 2015.19.
17.
Cherchye L, Moesen W, Rogge N, et al. (2007) An introduction to ‘benefit of the doubt’ composite indicators. Social Indicators Research 82(1): 111–145.
18.
De BorgerBKerstensK (1996) Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics26(2): 145–170.
19.
DesouzaKCJacobB (2014) Big data in the public sector: Lessons for practitioners and scholars. Administration and Society. Epub head of print 6 November 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0095399714555751.
20.
De WitteKGeysB (2011) Evaluating efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from a generalised conditional efficiency model for public libraries. Journal of Urban Economics69(3): 319–327.
21.
De WitteKLopez-TorresL (2017) Efficiency in education. A review of literature and a way forward. Journal of Operational Research Society. 68(4): 339–363.
22.
De WitteKMoesenW (2010) Sizing the government. Public Choice145(1): 39–55.
23.
DiamantoulakisPDKapinasVMKaragiannidisGK (2015) Big data analytics for dynamic energy management in smart grids. Big Data Research2(3): 94–101.
FaghmousJHKumarV (2014) A big data guide to understanding climate change: The case for theory-guided data science. Big Data2(3): 155–163.
26.
GandomiAHaiderM (2015) Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management35(2): 137–144.
27.
GaniASiddiqaAShamshirbandSet al. (2015) A survey on indexing techniques for big data: Taxonomy and performance evaluation. Knowledge and Information Systems46(2): 241–284.
HashemIChangVAnuarNet al. (2016) The role of big data in smart city. International Journal of Information Management36(5): 748–758.
30.
HeikkilaTIsettKR (2007) Citizen involvement and performance management in special-purpose governments. Public Administration Review67(2): 238–248.
31.
HoATKCoatesP (2002) Citizen participation: Legitimizing performance measurement as a decision tool. Government Finance Review18(2): 8–11.
32.
HofmannSBeverungenDRäckersMet al. (2013) What makes local governments' online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook. Government Information Quarterly30(4): 387–396.
33.
HollingsworthB (2008) The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery. Health Economics17(10): 1107–1128.
34.
HongH (2013) Government websites and social media's influence on government–public relationships. Public Relations Review39(4): 346–356.
35.
Hoon LeeJHPhaalRLeeSH (2013) An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change80(2): 286–306.
36.
IOM (2015) IOM Opens Global Migration Data Analysis Centre in Germany. International Organization for Migration. Press Release 09/08/15.
37.
JanssenMCharalabidisYZuiderwijkA (2012) Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management29(4): 258–268.
38.
JinXWahBWChengXet al. (2015) Significance and challenges of big data research. Big Data Research2(2): 59–64.
39.
JohnesGRuggieroJ (2017) Revenue efficiency in higher education institutions under imperfect competition. Public Policy and Administration. Epub ahead of print 1 August 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0952076716652935.
40.
Junqué de FortunyEMartensDProvostF (2013) Predictive modeling with big data: Is bigger really better?Big Data1: 215–226.
41.
KamalMM (2006) IT innovation adoption in the government sector: Identifying the critical success factors. Journal of Enterprise Information Management19(2): 192–222.
42.
KimGHTrimiSChungJH (2014) Big-data applications in the government sector. Communications of the ACM57(3): 78–85.
43.
KwonOLeeNShinB (2014) Data quality management, data usage experience and acquisition intention of big data analytics. International Journal of Information Management34(3): 387–394.
44.
Lazer D, Kennedy R, King G, et al. (2014) The parable of Google flu: Traps in big data analysis. Science 343(6176): 1203–1205.
45.
LeeGKwakYH (2012) An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly29(4): 492–503.
46.
LvYDuanYKangWet al. (2015) Traffic flow prediction with big data: A deep learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems16(2): 865–873.
47.
McConnellA (2015) What is policy failure? A primer to help navigate the maze. Public Policy and Administration30(3–4): 221–242.
48.
ManyikaJChuiMBrownBet al. (2011) Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity, New York, NY: McKinsey Global Institute Report.
49.
Margetts H and Dunleavy P (2013) The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 371(1987): 20120382.
50.
MargettsHZJohnPHaleSet al. (2015) Political Turbulence How Social Media Shape Collective Action, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
MeijerAJ (2016) Smart city governance: A local emergent perspective. In: Gil-GarciaJRet al. (eds) Smarter as the New Urban Agenda, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp. 73–85.
52.
MeijerAJThaensM (2013) Social media strategies: Understanding the differences between North American police departments. Government Information Quarterly30: 343–350.
53.
MeijerAJTorenvliedR (2016) Social media and the new organization of government communications: An empirical analysis of Twitter usage by the Dutch police. The American Review of Public Administration46(2): 143–161.
54.
MergelI (2012) The social media innovation challenge in the public sector. Information Polity17: 281–292.
55.
MergelI (2013) Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government. Government Information Quarterly30(2): 123–130.
56.
MergelIBretschneiderSI (2013) A three-stage adoption process for social media use in government. Public Administration Review73: 390–400.
57.
Mergel I, Rethemeyer RK and Isett K (2016) Big data in public affairs. Public Administration Review 76(6): 928–937.
58.
MorabitoV (2015a) Big data and analytics for government innovation. In: MorabitoA (ed.) Big Data and Analytics, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp. 23–45.
59.
Morabito V (2015b) Big Data and Analytics. Strategic and Organisational Impacts. Morabito A (ed.). Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
60.
Morgeson F (2014) Citizen Satisfaction: Improving Government Performance, Efficiency, and Citizen Trust. Palgrave Macmillan, US, New York.
61.
Mossberger K, Wu Y and Crawford J (2013) Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major US cities. Government Information Quarterly 30(4): 351–358.
62.
Mullich J (2013) Closing the big data gap in public sector. Bloomberg Businessweek Research Services, Survey Report, Real-Time Enterprise, Sep. 2013.
63.
NeshkovaMIGuoHD (2012) Public participation and organizational performance: Evidence from state agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory22(2): 267–288.
64.
OliveiraGHMWelchEW (2013) Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context. Government Information Quarterly30(4): 397–405.
65.
O'MalleyM (2014) Doing what works: Governing in the age of big data. Public Administration Review74(5): 555–556.
66.
O'Reilly T (2010) Government as platform. In: Lathrop D and Ruma L (eds) Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency and Participation in Practice. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media Inc., pp.11–39.
67.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2013) Government at a Glance 2013, Paris: OECD.
68.
Picazo-VelaSGutiérrez-MartínezILuna-ReyesLF (2012) Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly29(4): 504–511.
69.
PinaVTorresL (2001) Analysis of the efficiency of local government services delivery. An application to urban public transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice35(10): 929–944.
70.
PirogMA (2014) Data will drive innovation in public policy and management research in the next decade. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management33(2): 537–543.
71.
PollittC (2011) Mainstreaming technological change in the study of public management. Public Policy and Administration26(4): 377–397.
72.
RevelliFTovmoP (2007) Revealed yardstick competition: Local government efficiency patterns in Norway. Journal of Urban Economics62(1): 121–134.
73.
SampaioBRNetoOLSampaioY (2008) Efficiency analysis of public transport systems: Lessons for institutional planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice42(3): 445–454.
74.
ShawJ (2014) Why big data is a big deal. Harvard Magazine. March–April, 30–35, 74–75.
75.
SiemensGLongP (2011) Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review46(5): 30.
TeneOPolonetskyJ (2012) Privacy in the age of big data – A time for big decisions. Stanford Law Review. (online) 64, 63.
78.
Van de WalleS (2017) Explaining citizen satisfaction and dissatisfaction with public services. In: OngaroEVan ThielS (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, London: Palgrave.
79.
WashingtonAL (2014) Government information policy in the era of big data. Review of Policy Research31(4): 319–325.
80.
WilliamsonB (2014) Knowing public services: Cross-sector intermediaries and algorithmic governance in public sector reform. Public Policy and Administration29(4): 292–312.
81.
WilliamsonB (2016) Digital education governance: Data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments. Journal of Education Policy31(2): 123–141.
82.
WilsonJQ (1989) Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It, New York: Basic Books.
83.
YiuC (2012) The Big Data Opportunity, London: The Policy Exchange.
