This article examines elected officials’ opinions on Wisconsin’s controversial 2011 collective bargaining reform. Survey results from elected officials serving on city councils and village boards with less than 10,000 residents demonstrate that Act 10 is still viewed through a partisan lens, making its overall impact on municipal governance unsettled. We also find that officials who first came to office prior to Act 10 generally think the law has had a positive fiscal impact. Overall, the authors conclude that Act 10 cannot yet be viewed as a successful governance reform because it is still viewed by local policymakers through a narrow fiscal and partisan lens.
AmmonsDNSmithKWStenbergCW (2012) The future of local government will current stresses bring major, permanent changes?State and Local Government Review44(1 suppl): 64–75.
2.
AnziaSFMoeTM (2015) Public sector unions and the costs of government. The Journal of Politics77(1): 114–127.
3.
BerryCHowellWG (2005) Democratic accountability in public education. In: HowellWG (ed.) Besieged: School Boards and the Future of Education Politics, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 150–172.
4.
CompaLA (2014) An overview of collective bargaining in the United States [Electronic version]. In: HernándezJG (ed.) El derecho a la negociación colectiva: Monografías de temas laborales, Seville: Consejo Andaluz de Relaciones Laborales, pp. 91–98.
5.
CullenT (2015) Ringside Seat: Wisconsin Politics, the 1970s to Scott Walker, Mineral Point, WI: Little Creek Press.
6.
FaveroNBullockJB (2015) How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory25(1): 285–308.
7.
FordMR (2015) Governing for results on a post-collective bargaining Wisconsin School Board. Journal of School Choice9(4): 529–550.
8.
FordMRIhrkeDM (2015) School board member definitions of accountability: What are they, and do they impact district outcomes?Public Performance & Management Review39(1): 198–222.
9.
FreemanRBHanE (2012) The war against public sector collective bargaining in the US. Journal of Industrial Relations54(3): 386–408.
10.
FullerHMitchellG (2006) A culture of complaint. Education Next6(3): 18–22.
11.
Gabris GT and Nelson KL (2013) Transforming municipal boards into accountable, high-performing teams: Toward a diagnostic model of governing board effectiveness. Public Performance & Management Review 36(3): 472–495.
12.
HartneyMFlavinP (2011) From the schoolhouse to the statehouse: Teacher Union Political Activism and U.S. State Education Reform Policy. State Politics & Policy Quarterly11(3): 251–168.
13.
HealyB (2016) Act 10 Saves Wisconsin Taxpayers more than $5 Billion over 5 Years, MacIver Analysis Finds, Madison, WI: MacIver Institute.
14.
HeidbrederBGrasseNIhrkeDet al. (2011) Determinants of policy conflict in Michigan municipalities. State and Local Government Review43(1): 32–45.
15.
HessFLealD (2005) School house politics: Expenditures, interests, and competition in school board elections. In: HowellWG (ed.) Besieged: School Boards and the Future of Education Politics, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 228–253.
16.
IhrkeDMNiederjohnS (2005) Conflict on city councils in Wisconsin. Journal of Urban Affairs27(4): 453–462.
17.
JohnsonTIhrkeDM (2004) Determinants of conflict on Wisconsin town boards. State and Local Government Review36(2): 103–117.
18.
KingdonJ (1995) Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, New York, NY: Harper Collins College Publishers.
19.
KlingnerDE (1993) Public sector collective bargaining. Review of Public Personnel Administration13(3): 19–28.
20.
LevineHScorsoneE (2011) The Great Recession’s institutional change in the public employment relationship implications for state and local governments. State and Local Government Review43(3): 208–214.
21.
LewinDKeefeJHKochanTA (2012) The new great debate about unionism and collective bargaining in US state and local governments. Industrial & Labor Relations Review65(4): 749–778.
22.
MartinLLLeveyRCawleyJ (2012) The “new normal” for local government. State and Local Government Review44(1 suppl): 17S–28S.
23.
MillerM (2008) First, kill all the school boards. Atlantic Monthly, 92–94.
24.
MoeTM (2009) Collective bargaining and the performance of the public schools. American Journal of Political Science53(1): 156–174.
25.
Nelson KL, Gabris GT and Davis TJ (2011) What makes municipal councils effective? An empirical analysis of how council members perceive their group interactions and processes. State and Local Government Review 43(3): 196–204.
26.
PerlmanBJ (2011) The great recession and compensation practices new rules for compensation?State and Local Government Review43(3): 205–207.
27.
ReillyT (2013) Reforming public pay and benefits. State and Local Government Review45(1): 57–64.
28.
ReillyTReedMB (2011) Budget shortfalls, employee compensation, and collective bargaining in local governments. State and Local Government Review43(3): 215–223.
29.
RickmanPColburnB (2012) The response to Act 10. Social Policy42(1): 26.
30.
SteinJMarleyP (2013) More than they Bargained for: Scott Walker, Unions, and the Fight for Wisconsin, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
31.
WalkerS (2013) Unintimidated, New York, NY: Sentinel.
32.
Wisconsin Blue Book (2015) Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau, Madison, WI.
