This paper undertakes the first stakeholder analysis of the Nigerian oil and gas industry local content development (LCD) policy to gain a better understanding of the extent of stakeholders’ interactions and how such interactions align to conditions conducive to local content development. Drawing from policy documents and semi-structured interviews, 15 stakeholder groups are identified, and seven of them categorized as key “players.” A social network analysis then reveals that (i) a significant proportion of relationships between key players are unidirectional; (ii) a marginal role is played by higher education institutions within the network; (iii) it is international oil companies rather than indigenous operators that exhibit “global centrality” within the industry network, with the former stakeholder group pivotally determining industry activities. Our findings provide a valuable first step toward the development of a polycentric framework for the appraisal of the Nigerian local content development policy.
AckermannFEdenC (2011) Making Strategy: Mapping Out Strategic Success, London: Sage.
2.
AmehMO (2006) The Shift From Joint Operating Agreements to Production Sharing Contracts in the Nigerian Oil Industry: Any Benefits for the Players?, University of Dundee, Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy (CEPMLP), pp. 1–15.
3.
AyodeleORFrimpongS (2003) Economics of Nigerian Marginal Oil Fields SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, Dallas: Texas Society of Petroleum Engineers.
4.
BailurS (2006) Using stakeholder theory to analyze telecenter projects. Information Technologies and International Development3(3): 61–80.
5.
BakareAS (2011) Local content policy in oil sector and the capacity utilization in Nigerian manufacturing industry. Business and Management Review1(6): 82–92.
6.
BorgattiSEverettMJohnsonJ (2013) Analyzing Social Networks, London: Sage.
7.
BrysonJM (1995) Strategic Planning for Public and Non-Profit Organizations, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
BrysonJM (2004) What to do when stakeholders matter. Stakeholder Identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review6(1): 21–53.
9.
CartwrightDHararyF (1956) Structural balance: a generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review63(5): 277–293.
10.
ClarksonM (1995) Stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review20(1): 92–117.
11.
CummingsJLDohJP (2000) Identifying who matters: Mapping key players in multiple environments. California Management Review42(2): 83–104.
12.
DonaldsonTPrestonLE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review20(1): 65–91.
13.
EmoleCE (1996) The petroleum (Amendment) decree of Nigeria. Journal of African Law41(2): 239–245.
14.
FreemanER (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pitman.
15.
FreemanERReedDL (1983) Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective in corporate governance. California Management Review25(3): 88–106.
16.
FreemanLC (1979) Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks1(3): 215–239.
17.
FriedmanALMilesS (2002) Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies39(1): 1–21.
18.
HatalaJ-P (2006) Social network analysis in human resource development: A new methodology. Human Resource Development Review5(1): 45–71.
19.
Heum P (2008) Local content development: Experiences from oil and gas activities in Norway. SNF Working Paper 02/08SNF. Project 1285, pp. 1–21. Bergen, Norway: Institute for Research in Economics and Business Administration (SNF).
20.
Heum P, Quale C, Karlsen JE, et al. (2003) Enhancement of local content in the upstream oil and gas industry in Nigeria: A comprehensive and viable policy approach. Joint Study by SNF Institute for Research in Economics and Business Administration. Bergen, Norway SNF Report No. 25/03, August. Bergen, Norway: Institute for Research in Economics and Business Administration (SNF).
21.
IhuaUB (2010) Local content policy and SMEs sector promotion: The Nigerian oil industry experience. International Journal of Business and Management5(5): 1–11.
22.
IhuaUBOlabowaleOAElojiKN (2011) Entrepreneurial implications of Nigeria’s oil industry local content policy perceptions from the Niger Delta region. Journal of Enterprising Communities5(3): 223–241.
23.
MandaranoLA (2009) Social network analysis of social capital in collaborative planning. Society & Natural Resources22(3): 245–260.
24.
MilesS (2012) Stakeholder: Essentially contested or just confused?Journal of Business Ethics108(3): 285–298.
25.
MitchellRAgleBWoodD (1997) Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review22(4): 853–886.
26.
MorenoJL (1934) Who Shall Survive?, Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co.
27.
NOGIC Act (2010) Nigeria Oil and Gas Industry Content Bill. Explanatory Memorandum 1--33.
28.
OmenikoloIAAmadiRO (2010) Challenges facing Nigerian local content in oil and gas industry. Continental Journal of Renewable Energy1: 15–20.
29.
Petroleum Act (1990) Laws of the Federation of Nigeria. Chapter 10 (350 LFN 1990).
30.
Petroleum Training Institute (2011) Vision and Mission Statement. Available at: http://ptinigeria.org/ (accessed 27 March 2015).
31.
PhillipsR (2003) Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
32.
ReedMSGravesADandyN (2009) Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management90(5): 1933–1949.
33.
ScottJ (2000) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, London: Sage.
34.
SerratO (2009) Social Network Analysis, Washington, DC: Asian Development Bank.
