There is some tendency to lump together policy failures arising from different sources and having different fundamental characteristics. This is a problem conceptually, as well as for building effective theory about policy failure, but it can also be a practical difficulty for policymakers if they fail to differentiate these various possible roots of failure. This paper explores the linkages among these types of failure within the public sector.
BovensMAP‘t HartPPetersBG (2000) Success and Failure in Public Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
3.
BowenER (1982) The Pressman–Wildavsky paradox: Four addenda, or why models based on probability theory can predict implementation success and suggest useful tactical advice for implementers. Journal of Public Policy2. 1–21.
4.
BrinkenhoffDW (2005) Rebuilding governance in failed states and post-conflict societies: Core concepts and cross-cutting themes. Public Administration and Development25: 3–14.
5.
Bueno de MesquitaBMorrowJDSiversonRMSmithA (1999) Policy failure and political survival: The contribution of political institutions. Journal of Conflict Resolution43: 147–161.
6.
CarmentD (2004) Assessing state failure: Implications for theory and policy. Third World Quarterly24: 407–427.
7.
CollierDLevitskyS (1997) Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics49: 430–451.
8.
CreweIKingA (2013) The Blunders of Our Governments, London: Oneworld Publications.
9.
CyertRMarchJG (1963) The Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10.
Dahlström C, Guy Peters B and Pierre J (eds) (2011) Steering from the Centre: Central Government Offices and Their Roles in Governing. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
11.
DolfsmaW (2013) Government Failure: Society, Market and Rules, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
12.
DoversSRHezriAA (2010) Institutions and policy processes: The means to the end of adaptation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Review: Climate Change1: 212–231.
13.
GanghofS (2003) Promises and pitfalls of veto player analysis. Swiss Political Science Review9: 1–25.
14.
GoodsellCT (2011) Mission Mystique: Belief Systems in Public Agencies, Washington, DC: CQ Press.
15.
HaldénP (2011) Stability without Statehood: Lessons from Europe’s History before the Sovereign State, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
16.
HallP (1980) Great Planning Disasters, Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
‘t HartP (1980) Groupthink in Government: A Study of Small Groups and Policy Failure, Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
18.
HoodC (2011) The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy and Self-Preservation in Government, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19.
Howlett M (2009) Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences 42: 73–89.
20.
HupePL (2011) The thesis of incongruent implementation: Revisiting pressman and wildavsky. Public Policy and Administration26: 63–80.
21.
HydenGCourtJMeaseK (2004) Making Sense of Governance: Empirical Evidence from 16 Developing Countries, Boulder: Lynne Reiner.
22.
JannWWeigrichK (2007) Theories of the policy cycle. In: FischerFMillerGJStanleyMS (eds) Handbook of Public Policy Analysis, Boca Raton: CRC Press.
23.
KerrDH (1976) The logic of policy and successful policies. Policy Sciences7: 351–363.
24.
KooimanJ (2003) Governing as Governance, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Le VanAC (2011) Power-sharing and inclusive politics in Africa’s uncertain democracies. Governance24: 31–53.
26.
LightPC (2002) Government’s Greatest Achievements: From Civil Rights to Homeland Defense, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
27.
LijphartA (2012) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Democracies, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
McConnellA (2010) Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
29.
MannTEOrnsteinNJ (2012) It’s Worse than it Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collides with the New Politics of Extremism, New York: Basic Books.
30.
PainterMPierreJ (2005) Challenges to State Policy Capacity: Global Trends and Comparative Perspectives, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
31.
Peters BG (2012) Strategies for Comparative Political Research. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
32.
PetersBG (2015) The Pursuit of Coordination: The Politics of Horizontal Management, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
33.
Peters BG and Pierre J (2015) Governance and Comparative Politics.
34.
PressmanJLWildavskyA (1974) Implementation, Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
PuskaPStahlT (2010) Health in all policies–The finnish initiative: Background, principles, and current issues. Annual Review of Public Health31: 315–28.
36.
RaudlaR (2010) Governing budgetary commons: What can we learn from elinor ostrom?European Journal of Law and Economics30: 201–221.
37.
RhodesRAW (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Buckingham: Open University Press.
38.
RoseR (1976) On the priorities of government. European Journal of Political Research4: 247–286.
39.
RosenthalU‘t HartPKouzminA (1991) The bureau-politics of crisis management. Public Administration68: 211–233.
40.
SachsJD (2011) America’s ungovernable budget. International Economy25: 52–63.
41.
ScharpfFW (1988) The joint decision trap: Lessons from German federalsim and European integration. Public Administration66: 239–278.
42.
ScharpfFW (1997) Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder, CO: Westview.
43.
SchwartzJE (1983) America’s Hidden Success: A Reassessment of Twenty Years of Public Policy, New York: W. W. Norton.
44.
SieberS (1981) Fatal Remedies: The Ironies of Social Intervention, New York: Paradigm.
45.
SørensenETorfingJ (2007) Theoretical approaches to governance network dynamics. In: SørensenETorfingJ (eds) Theories of Democratic Network Governance, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
46.
TorfingJPetersBGPierreJSørensenE (2011) Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
TsebelisG (2000) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
TullockGSeldonABradyGL (2002) Government Failure: A Primer in Public Choice, Washington, DC: The Cato Institute.
49.
WeibleCSabatierPA (2007) A guide to the advocacy coalition framework. In: FischerFMillerGJStanleyMS (eds) Handbook of Public Policy Analysis, Boca Raton: CRC Press.
50.
WolfC (1987) Market and non-market failures: Comparison and assessment. Journal of Public Policy7: 43–70.
51.
ZürnMFaudeB (2013) On fragmentation, differentiation and coordination. Global Environmental Politics13: 119–130.
52.
ZahariadisN (2003) Ambiguity and Choice in Public Policy: Political Decision-Making in Modern Democracies, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
