This article addresses committee scrutiny undertaken at the National Assembly for Wales during the third assembly (2007–2011). The analysis is addressed through a scrutiny framework that considers the substantive issues in terms of three overarching elements – selection, access to information and assistance, and evaluation. The framework is developed through scholarship about the UK House of Commons as well as a wide range of other parliaments and assemblies. This analysis is also used to identify features facilitating effectiveness and specify seven hypotheses concerning explanations for scrutiny characteristics. The analysis is then applied to the Welsh case study, which results from a substantive series of interviews with Assembly Members, witnesses and officials, as well as significant documentary analysis.
AndertonJ(1999) The future of the committee system. In: BarnhartG (eds) Parliamentary Committees, London: Cavendish, pp. 53–60.
2.
AshworthRSnapeS (2004) An overview of scrutiny: a triumph of context over structure. Local Government Studies30(4): 538–556.
3.
Bal ShekarS(2003) Departmentally-Related Standing Committees (DRSCs) in India. In: KesavanK (eds) Parliamentary Committees in Japan and India, New Delhi: Manak, pp. 88–105.
DrewryG (1985) The New Select Committees: A Study of the 1979 Reforms, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11.
FalletiT (2005) A sequential theory of decentralization: Latin American cases in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review99(3): 327–346.
12.
GeorgeBMorganDWhatfordN(2005) House of Commons committees and national security. In: BaldwinN (eds) Parliament in the 21st Century, London: Politico’s, pp. 145–163.
13.
GiriN (2005) Parliamentary Committees in Britain and India, Delhi: Vista.
14.
GoodsellC (1988) The architecture of parliaments, legislative houses and political culture. British Journal of Political Science18(3): 287–302.
15.
GWA (Government of Wales Act) (1998) London: HMSO.
16.
GWA (Government of Wales Act) (2006) London: HMSO.
17.
HC 300 (2000) Shifting the Balance: Select Committees and the Executive, London: Stationery Office.
18.
JogerstM (1993) Reform in the House of Commons, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
19.
Jones S, Charles N and Davies A (2009) Transforming masculinist political cultures? Doing politics in new political institutions. Sociological Review Online 14(2).
20.
JudgeD (1992) The “effectiveness” of the post–1979 Select Committee system: the verdict of the 1990 Procedure Committee. Political Quarterly63(1): 91–100.
21.
KayA (2003) Evaluating devolution in Wales. Political Studies51(1): 51–66.
22.
KesavanK(2003) The role of parliamentary committees in Japan. In: KesavanK (eds) Parliamentary Committees in Japan and India, New Delhi: Manak, pp. 38–70.
23.
LazardeuxG (2009) The French National Assembly’s oversight of the executive: changing role, partisanship and intra-majority conflict. West European Politics32(2): 287–309.
MaerLSandfordM (2004) Select Committees under Scrutiny, London: Constitution Unit.
26.
MansfeldovaZ (2011) Central European parliaments over two decades – diminishing stability? Parliaments in Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia. The Journal of Legislative Studies17(2): 128–146.
27.
McAllisterL (2001) Plaid Cymru, Bridgend, Wales: Seren.
28.
McAllisterLStirbuD (2007) Developing devolution’s scrutiny potential: a comparative evaluation of the National Assembly for Wales’ subject committees. Policy and Politics35(2): 289–309.
29.
McKayWJohnsonC (2010) Parliament and Congress, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
MeldingD(2003) The National Assembly and the art of conversation. In: EdwardsA (eds) From Protest to Process, Bangor, Wales: Cyhoeddiadau’r Gair, pp. 81–84.
31.
MengHC(1999) System of committees in the Parliament of Singapore. In: BarnhartG (eds) Parliamentary Committees, London: Cavendish.
32.
MitchellJ (2009) Devolution in the UK, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
33.
MonkD (2010) A framework for evaluating the performance of committees in Westminster parliaments. The Journal of Legislative Studies16(1): 1–13.
SmithG (1980) Politics in Western Europe, London: Heinemann.
45.
StapenhurstRPelizzoR (2012) Improving democracy and accountability in Ghana: the importance of parliamentary oversight tools. Governance25(2): 335–346.
46.
StokerG(1995) Introduction. In: MarshDStokerG (eds) Theory and Methods in Political Science, Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan, pp. 1–18.
47.
StoneB (1998) Size and executive-legislative relations in Australian parliaments. Australian Journal of Political Science33(1): 37–55.
48.
StromK (1998) Parliamentary committees in European democracies. Journal of Legislative Studies4(1): 21–59.
