Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article adds to the literature on public services inspection by tracking the evolution of the BV inspection process within the service specific context of English public library provision. Drawing upon a range of policy documentation and a longitudinal content analysis of the highest and lowest scoring BV library inspection reports, the article draws attention to the reports' coverage of the libraries' procedures for income generation, competition, outsourcing and public-private partnership. This focus is used both as a means to examine the argument that contemporary public sector reform measures have led to the increased liberalisation and commercialisation of public libraries and to check the stability of the inspection processes over time. The findings from this analysis reveal that although the content of much of the early policy documentation and initial inspection reports lend support to the increased commercialisation and liberalisation argument, a slightly more balanced picture emerges when this analysis is extended to include the findings from more recent library inspection reports. In reaching these conclusions, however, broader question marks about the longer-term stability of the inspection process are also raised.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alstad, C. and Curry, A. (2003), ‘Public Space, Public Discourse and Public libraries’ , Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal, Vol 13, No 1, pp. 1-33 .

Andrews, R. (2004), ‘Analysing Deprivation and Local Authority Performance: The implications for CPA’ , Public Money and Management, Vol 24, No 1, pp. 19-26 .

Audit Commission (2000), Seeing is Believing: How the Audit Commission will carry out best inspections in England, ( London: Audit Commission ).

Audit Commission (2001), Changing Gear: Best Value Annual Statement, ( London: Audit Commission ).

Audit Commission (2002a), Building better library services Learning from Audit, Inspection and Research, ( London: Audit Commission ).

Audit Commission (2005a), Approach to service inspections, ( London: Audit Commission ).

Audit Commission (2005b), Service Assessment Frameworks, ( London: Audit Commission ).

Ball, S. (1997), ‘Good School/Bad School: paradox and fabrication’ , British Journal of Education, Vol 18, No 3, pp. 317-336 .

Bovaird, T. (2000), ‘The role of competition and competitiveness in Best Value in England and Wales’ , Public Policy and Administration, Vol 15, No 4, pp. 82-99 .

10.

Boyne, G. (1999), ‘Introduction: Processes, Performance and Best Value in Local Government’ , Local Government Studies, Vol 25, No 2, pp. 1-15 .

11.

Boyne, G. (2002), ‘Concepts and Indicators of Local Authority Performance: An Evaluation of the Statutory Frameworks in England and Wales’ , Public Money and Management, Vol 22, No 2, pp. 17-24 .

12.

Boyne G. , Day P. and Walker, R. (2002), ‘The evaluation of Public Service Inspection: A Theoretical Framework’ , Urban Studies, Vol 39, No 7, pp. 1197-1212 .

13.

Bruijn, H. (2002), ‘Performance measurement in the public sector: strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement’ , The International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol 15, No 7, pp. 578-594 .

14.

Cutler, T. and Waine, B. (1997), Managing the welfare state Text and Sourcebook, ( Oxford: Berg ).

15.

Cutler, T. and Waine, B. (2003), ‘Advancing Public Accountability? The Social Services “Star” Ratings’ , Public Money and Management, Vol 23, No 2, pp. 125-128 .

16.

Department of Culture, Media and Sport (2004), Framework for the Future: Libraries, Learning and Information in the Next Decade, ( London: Crown ).

17.

Department of Culture, Media and Sport (2004), Comprehensive, Efficient and Modern Public Libraries - Standards and Assessment, ( London: Crown ).

18.

Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1999), Circular 10/99, Local Government Act 1999: Part I Best Value, ( London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions ).

19.

Department of Transport Local Government and the Regions DTLR (2001), Strong Local Leadership Quality Public Services, ( London: Crown ).

20.

Entwistle, T. and Martin, S. (2005), ‘From Competition to Collaboration in Public Service Delivery: A New Agenda for Research’ , Public Administration, Vol 8, No 21, pp. 233-242 .

21.

Gilroy, D. and Wilcox, B. (1997), ‘OfSTED criteria and the nature of social understanding: a Wittgensteinian critique of the practice of educational judgement’ , British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol 45, No 1, pp. 22-38 .

22.

Higgins, P. (2005), ‘Performance and User Satisfaction Indicators in Local Government: Lessons from a case study’ , Public Management Review, Vol 7, No 3, pp. 445-446 .

23.

Higgins, P. James, P. and Roper, I. (2004), ‘Best Value: Is it Delivering?’ , Public Money and Management, Vol 24, No 4, pp. 251-258 .

24.

Higgins, P. James, P. and Roper, I. (2005), ‘The role of competition in Best Value: How Far Does it Differ to CCT?’ , Local Government Studies, Vol 31, No 2, pp. 219-235 .

25.

Hood C. , James O. and Scott C. (2000), ‘Regulation of Government: Has it increased, is it increasing, should it be diminished’ , Public Administration, Vol 78, No 2, pp. 283-304 .

26.

Humphrey, J. (2001), ‘Bewitched or Bewildered? “Facts” and “Values” in Audit Commission Texts’ , Local Government Studies, Vol 27, No 2, pp. 19-43 .

27.

Jones, S. (2005), ‘Five Faults and a Submission: The Case for the Local Government Improvement Programme’ , Local Government Studies, Vol 31, No 5, pp. 655-676 .

28.

Lowndes, V. (2003), ‘Between Rhetoric and Reality: Does the 2001 White Paper Reverse the Centralising Trend in Britain?’, in P. Carmichael and A. Midwinter (eds), Regulating Local Authorities, ( London: Frank Cass ).

29.

Macnaught, B. (2004), ‘Impact and performance measurement in public library services in the UK’ , Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol 5, No, 3, pp. 96-100 .

30.

Millward, L. (2005), ‘We are announcing your Target: reflections on Performantive Language in the Making of English Housing Policy’ , Local Government Studies, Vol 31, No 5, pp. 597-614 .

31.

Painter, J. (1992), ‘The culture of competition’ , Public Policy and Administration, Vol 7, Nol, pp. 1-20 .

32.

Power, M. (1997), The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).

33.

Plummer, K. (2001), Documents of Life 2: an invitation to a critical humanism, ( London: Sage ).

34.

Rashman, L. and Radnor, Z. (2005), ‘Learning to Improve: Approaches to Improving Local Government Services’ , Public Money and Management, Vol 25, No 1, pp. 19-26 .

35.

Rikowski, R. (2002), ‘The Capitalisation of Libraries’, The commoner, May 2002, pp. 1-30.

36.

Smith, P. (1995), ‘On the Unintended Consequences of Publishing Performance Data in the Public Sector’ , International Journal of Public Administration, Vol 18, No 2/3, pp. 277-310 .

37.

Watson, A. (2001), Best Returns: Best Value Guidance for Local Authorities in England, 2nd Edition, July, ( London: Library Association ).

38.

Webb, E. , Cambell, D. , Schwartz, R. and Sechrist, L. (1981), Nonreactive measures in the Social Sciences, ( Boston: Houghton Mifflin ).

39.

Winkley, D. (1999), ‘An examination of Ofsted’, in C. Cullingford (ed.), An Inspector Calls, ( London: Kogan Page ).

Contemporary Public Library Provision in England: A Content Analysis of the Highest and Lowest Scoring Inspection Reports

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References