This article examines the ways that voluntary organisations are re-positioning as democratic actors as they are drawn into new (electronic) relationships with government. Drawing upon our own empirical research we examine the new information resources and requirements that are emerging around these organisations as this re-positioning is played out. We look, too, at the emergent information relationships and capabilities that are enabled as voluntary organisations begin to harness information and communication technologies (ICTs) in pursuit of democratic objectives. Employing the concept of the ‘information polity’ we map out a framework for the sustained empirical enquiry that will allow new patterns of influence to be mapped and understood.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bellamy, C. and Taylor, J.A. (1998), Governing in the Information Age ( Buckingham: Open University Press ).
2.
BT Government (2000), e-Government. Ready or Not? 1, July ( London: BT ).
3.
Burt, E. and Taylor, J.A. (2000), ‘Information and Communication Technologies: Reshaping Voluntary Organizations?’ , Voluntary Management and Leadership, Vol 11, No 2, pp. 131-144 .
4.
Burt, E. and Taylor, J.A. (2001), ‘Advanced Networked Technologies in the UK Voluntary Sector’ , Voluntas: The International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol 12, No 4, pp. 313-326 .
5.
Burt, E. and Taylor, J.A. (2002), Voluntary Organisations in the Electronic Polity: Technological Capacity, Organisational Capabilities, and Competitive Edge, Department of Management, University of St Andrews & The Centre for the Study of Telematics and Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University .
6.
Burt, E. and Taylor, J.A. (2003), ‘New Technologies, Embedded Values, and Strategic Change: Evidence from the UK Voluntary Sector’ , Voluntary and Nonprofit Sector Quarterly, Vol 32 No 1, pp. 115-127 .
7.
Davis Smith, J. (1997), National Survey of Volunteering ( London: Institute for Volunteering Research ).
8.
De Tocqueville, A. (1998), Democracy in America (tr. H. Reeve), ( London: Wordsworth ).
9.
Deakin, N. (1996), Meeting the Challenge of Change: Voluntary Action into the 21st Century. The Report of the Commission on the Future of the Voluntary Sector ( London: NCVO ).
10.
Grant, W. (2001), ‘Pressure Politics. From Insider Politics to Direct Action’ , Parliamentary Affairs, Vol 54, pp. 337-348 .
11.
Hansmann, H. (1987), ‘Economic Theories of Voluntary Organization’, in The Voluntary Sector: a Research Handbook, by W.W. Powell (ed.), ( Yale: Yale University ).
12.
HM Government / UK Online (2002), In The Service of Democracy: a Consultation paperfor Electronic Democracy (London).
13.
Home Office (1998), Compact on Relations Between Government and the Voluntary and Community Sector in England, CM 4100 (London).
14.
Jas, P. , Wilding, K. , Wainwright, S. , Passey, A. and Hems, L. (2002), The UK Voluntary Sector Almanac ( London: NCVO ).
15.
Lowe, P. , Murdoch, J. , Norton, A. (2000), Professionals and Volunteers in the Environmental Process, Centre for Rural Economy, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne .
16.
McGinty, S. (2003), ‘The End of Innocence’, in The Scotsman Magazine, May, pp.11-13.
17.
NCVO (1998), ‘Blurred Vision - Public Trust in Charities’, Research Quarterly, January.
18.
NCVO (2000), ‘Coming Apart - or Coming Together?, Research Quarterly, 11-11.
19.
NCVO (2003), Charities and Not-for-profits: a Modem Legal Framework. An NCVO briefing paper on the Government' response to ‘Private Action, Public Benefit’ (London).
20.
Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change ( Cambridge, Mass:, Harvard University Press ).
21.
Office of the e-Envoy (2003), Policy Framework for a Mixed Economy in the Supply of e-Government Services: a Consultation Document (London).
22.
Park, A. (2000), ‘The Generation Game’ in British Social Attitudes ( London: Sage ).
23.
Plowden, W. (2001), ‘England - Five Years After Deakin’, in Next Steps in Voluntary Action: An Analysis of Five Years of Developments in the Voluntary Sector in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales ( London: NCVO and The Centre for Civil Society, LSE ).
24.
Putnam, R. (2000), Bowling Alone ( London: Simon and Schuster ).
25.
Salamon, L. and Anheier, H.K. (1994), The Emerging Sector: an Overview ( Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press ).
26.
Saxton, J. and Game, S. (2000), Virtual Promise ( London: Third Sector ).
27.
Social Trends (2003), ( London: ONS ).
28.
Taylor, J.A. (1998), ‘Informatization as X-ray: What is Public Administration for the Information Age?’, in Snellen, I.Th.M. and van de Donk, W.B.H.J. (eds), Public Administration in an Information Age ( Oxford: IOS Press ).
29.
Taylor, J.A. and Burt, E. (2001), ‘Pluralising Teledemocracy. Not-for-profits in the Democratic Polity’, in Prins, J.E.J. (ed.), Designing E-Government: On the Crossroads of Technological Innovation and Institutional Change ( Amsterdam: Kluwer Law International ), pp.29-38.
30.
Weisbrod, B. (1977), The Voluntary Sector ( Lexington: D.C. Heath Lexington Mass & Co. ).
