Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Peter Self (1919-1999) was a participant in the policy-making domain as well as a distinguished academic. This assessment is primarily concerned with his contribution to the academic study of political science, including the sub-disciplines of public policy and public administration. It selects four ‘volumes of influence’ spanning the period from 1972 to 2000. The evaluation particularly focuses upon the relevance of Self's work to on-going predicaments faced by governments, not least the light that work continues to shed on issues inherent in the public management paradigm so dominant in the discourse of the public domain during the last 25 years. It can be contended that Self's social democratic mindset had not fully come to terms with the changing parameters within which governments nowadays must operate and that, as such, he was very much a creature of the 20th rather than the 21st century. Yet, by reaffirming the importance of the public domain in addressing the problems and challenges of contemporary society, the selected work was unusual in providing a coherent narrative. Moreover, in delineating dilemmas arising from conflicting administrative values, Self elucidated underlying administrative tensions that continue to bedevil ‘third-wayism’.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baggini, J. (1999), ‘The view from number ten’ , The Stakeholder, Vol 3, No 4, pp. 13-14 .

Bentley, T. and S. Goss (2003), ‘Labour is drifting in a sea of pessimism; it needs help’, The Guardian, 15 September.

Bevir, M. , R.A.W. Rhodes and P. Weller (eds) (2003), ‘Traditions of governance: History and diversity’ , Public Administration, Vol 81, No 1.

Bobbitt, P. (2002), The shield of Achilles: War, peace and the course of history,( London: Allen Lane ).

Brooks, J. (2000), ‘Labour's modernisation of local government’ , Public Administration, Vol 78, No 3, pp. 593-612 .

Chapman, J. (2002), ‘Systems thinking and the modernising agenda’ , Public Management and Policy Association Review, No 19, pp. 3-5 .

Christensen, T. , P. Laegreid and L.R. Wise (2002), ‘Transforming administrative policy’ , Public Administration, Vol 80, No 1, pp. 153-178 .

Collins, T. (2002), ‘Mandarins and technocrats’, The Guardian, 14 September.

Dolowitz, D.P. with R. Hulme , M. Nellis and F. O'Neill (2000), Policy transfer and British social policy, ( Buckingham: Open University Press ).

10.

E-Government Bulletin (2002), ‘We need architects as well as plumbers’, Issue 124, pp.8-10.

11.

Flinders, M. (2002), ‘Governance in Whitehall’ , Public Administration, Vol 80, No 1, pp. 51-75 .

12.

Giddens, A. (1998), The third way: The renewal of social democracy, ( Cambridge: Polity Press ).

13.

Guy Peters, B. (2002), ‘Governing in a market era’, in E. Vigoda (ed.), Public administration: An interdisciplinary critical analysis, ( New York: Marcel Dekker ).

14.

Hall, P. (1999), ‘Obituary: Professor Peter Self’, The Independent, 14 April.

15.

Hood, C. (1991), ‘A public management for all seasons’ , Public Administration, Vol 69, No 1, pp. 3-19 .

16.

Hood, C. (1995), ‘Emerging issues in public administration’ , Public Administration, Vol 73, No 1, pp. 165-183 .

17.

Hood, C. (2000), The art of the state, ( Oxford: Clarendon Press ).

18.

Hood, C. and M. Jackson (1991), Administrative argument, ( Aldershot: Dartmouth ).

19.

Hood, C. , O. James and C. Scott (2000), ‘Regulation of government: has it increased, is it increasing, should it be diminished?’ , Public Administration, Vol 78, No 2, pp. 283-304 .

20.

Hughes, O.E. (2003, 3rd edn), Public management and administration, ( Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan ).

21.

Hutton, W. (2002), The world we're in, ( London: Little, Brown ).

22.

Islam, F. (2002), ‘Target practice required’, The Observer, 14 July.

23.

Kay, J. (2003), The truth about markets: Their genius, their limits, their follies, ( London: Allen Lane ).

24.

Kickert, W.J.M. (ed.) (1997), Public management and administrative reform in Western Europe, ( Cheltenham: Edward Elgar ).

25.

Lee, J.M. (1986), ‘Review, Political theories of modern government’, Public Administration, Vol 64, No 1, pp. 115-116 .

26.

Lee, S. and R. Woodward (2002), ‘Implementing the Third Way: The delivery of public services under the Blair government’ , Public Money & Management, Vol 22, No 4, pp. 49-56 .

27.

Ling, T. (2002), ‘Delivering joined-up government in the UK: Dimensions, issues and problems’ , Public Administration, Vol 80, No 4, pp. 615-642 .

28.

Lowndes, V. and D. Wilson (2003), ‘Balancing revisability and robustness? A new institutionalist perspective on local government modernisation’ , Public Administration, Vol 81, No 2, pp. 275-298 .

29.

Newman, J. (2001), Modernising governance: New Labour, policy and society, ( London: Sage ).

30.

Nolan, B.C. (ed.) (2001), Public sector reform: An international perspective, ( Basingstoke: Palgrave ).

31.

Painter, C. and E. Clarence (2000), ‘New Labour and inter-governmental management: Flexible networks or performance control?’ , Public Management, Vol 2, No 4, pp. 477-498 .

32.

Paton, R. (2003), Managing and measuring social enterprises, ( London: Sage ).

33.

Pratchett, L. (ed.) (2000), Renewing local democracy? The modernisation agenda in British local government, ( London: Frank Cass ).

34.

Rhodes, R.A.W. (2000), The governance narrative, ( London: Public Management and Policy Association ).

35.

Self, P. (1975), Econocrats and the policy process: The politics and philosophy of cost-benefit analysis, ( London: Macmillan ).

36.

Self, P. (1977, 2nd edn), Administrative theories and politics, ( London: Allen & Unwin ).

37.

Self, P. (1985), Political theories of modern government: Its role and reform, ( London: Allen & Unwin ).

38.

Self, P. (2000), Rolling back the market: Economic dogma and political choice, ( London; Mamillan ).

39.

Self, P. and H.J. Storing (1962), The state and the farmer, ( London: Allen & Unwin ).

40.

Stewart, J. (2000), Review, ‘Rolling back the market’ , Public Administration, Vol 78, No 2, pp. 470-471 .

41.

Sullivan, H. and C. Skelcher (2002), Working across boundaries: collaboration in public services, ( Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan ).

42.

Vickers, G. (1973), Review, ‘Administrative theories and politics’ , Public Administration, Vol 51, Summer, pp. 223-224 .

43.

Vigoda, E. (ed.) (2002), Public administration: an interdisciplinary critical analysis, ( New York: Marcel Dekker ).

44.

Walker, D. (2003), ‘Call for Napoleon’, The Guardian, 1 May.

45.

Williams, P. (2002), ‘The competent boundary spanner’ , Public Administration, Vol 80, No 1, pp. 103-124 .

46.

Wright, T. and A. Gamble (2003), ‘Restating the state’ , The Political Quarterly, Vol 74, No 2, pp. 143-145 .

Peter Self's Legacy: Economic Hegemony and the Public Domain

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References