Analysis (2001), Unreliable Evidence? BBC Radio 4, Broadcast date: 26 July.
2.
Black, N. (2001), ‘Evidence based policy: proceed with care’ , British Medical Journal, 323, 7307, pp. 275280 .
3.
Blunkett, D. (2000), ‘Influence or irrelevance: can social science improve government?’, Speech to the Economic and Social Research Council, 2 February at http://www.bera.ac.uk/beradev2002/root/archive/ri/no71/index.html
4.
Bohme, K. (2002), ‘Much ado about evidence: reflections from policy making in the European Union’ , Planning Theory and Practice, Vol 3, No 1, pp. 98-101 .
5.
Bulmer, M. (1988), ‘Social science expertise and executive-bureaucratic politics in Britain’ , Governance, Vol 1, No 1, pp. 26-49 .
Cabinet Office (1999b), Professional Policy Making for the Twenty First Century, Report by Strategic Policy Making Team, ( London: Cabinet Office ).
8.
Campbell, H. (2002), ‘Evidence-based policy’. the continuing search for effective policy processes’ , Planning Theory and Practice, Vol 3, No 1, pp. 89-90 .
9.
Centre for Management and Policy Studies (2001), Better Policy-Making, ( London: Centre for Management and Policy Studies ).
10.
Cook, F.L. (2001), ‘Evidence-based policy making in a democracy: exploring the role of policy research in conjunction with politics and public opinion’ , Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Conference, San Francisco.
11.
David, M. (2002), ‘Introduction: themed section on evidence-based policy as a concept for modernising governance and social science research’ , Social Policy and Society, Vol 1, No 3, pp. 213-214 .
12.
Davies, H.T.O. , Nutley, S.M. and Smith, P.C. (2000), What works? Evidence based policy and practice in public services, ( Bristol: The Policy Press ).
13.
Davies, H.T.O. and Nutley, S.M. (2002), Evidence-based policy and practice: moving from rhetoric to reality, Research Unit for Research Utilisation, University of St. Andrews , Discussion Paper 1.
14.
Economic and Social Research Council at http://www.esrc.ac.uk
15.
Evidence Network at http://www.evidencenetwork.orgfhistory.asp
16.
Gough, D. and Elbourne, D. (2002), ‘Systematic research synthesis to inform policy, practice and democratic debate’ , Social Policy and Society, Vol 1, No 3, pp. 225-236 .
17.
Healy, A. (2002), ‘Commentary: Evidence-based Policy - the latest form of inertia and control?’ , Planning Theory and Practice, Vol 3, No 1, pp. 97-98 .
18.
Innes, J. (2002), ‘Improving policy making with information’ , Planning Theory and Practice, Vol 3, No 1, pp. 102-104 .
19.
Leicester, G. (1999), ‘The seven enemies of evidence-based policy’, Public Money and Management, January-March, pp.5-7.
20.
Lomas, J. (2000), ‘Connecting research and policy’ , Isuama: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, Vol 1, No 1, pp. 140-144 .
21.
Meynaud, J. (1964), Technocracy, ( London: Faber and Faber ).
22.
Nutley, S. and Webb, J. (2000), ‘Evidence and the policy process’ in H.T.O. Davies , S.M. Nutley and P. Smith (eds), What Works? Evidence-Based policy and practice in public services, ( Bristol: Policy Press ).
23.
Nutley, S.M. and Davies, H.T.O. (2000), ‘Making a reality of evidence-based practice: some lessons from the diffusion of innovations’, Public Money and Management, October-December, pp.35-42.
24.
Nutley, S.M. , Davies, H.T.O. and Walter, I. (2002a), Evidence based policy and practice: cross sector lessons from the UK, ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice : Working Paper 9.
25.
Nutley, S.M. , Davies, H.T.O. and Walter, I. (2002b), From knowing to doing: A framework for understanding the evidence-into-practice agenda, Research Unit for Research Utilisation, University of St. Andrews , Discussion Paper 1.
26.
Nutley, S.M. , Davies, H.T.O. and Tilley, N. (2000), ‘Editorial: Getting research into practice’, Public Money and Management, October-December, pp.3-6.
27.
Packwood, A. (2002), ‘Evidence-based policy: rhetoric and reality’ , Social Policy and Society, Vol 1, No 3, pp. 267-272 .
28.
Pawson, R. (2001), Evidence and policy and naming and shaming, ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice Working Paper 5.
29.
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997), Realistic Evaluation, ( London: Sage ).
30.
Performance and Innovation Unit (2000), Adding It Up: Improving Analysis and Modelling in Central Government, ( London: The Stationery Office ).
31.
Plomin, J. (2001), ‘Government policy ‘ignores’ research results’, The Guardian, September 17.
32.
Regard (2001), Re: Regard - The quarterly newsletter of the ESRC's research database service, No 1, December.
33.
Rudig, W. (1993), ‘Sources of technical controversy: proximity to or alienation from technology?’, in A. Barker and B.G. Peters (eds) The Politics of Expert Advice: creating, using and manipulating scientific knowledge for public policy, ( Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press ).
34.
Sanderson, I. (2002), ‘Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making’ , Public Administration, Vol 80, No 1, pp. 1-22 .
35.
Smith, A. (1996), ‘Mad cows and ecstasy: change and choice in an evidence-based society’ , Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, Vol 159, No 3, pp. 367-383 .
36.
Solesbury, W. (2002), ‘The ascendancy of evidence’ , Planning Theory and Practice, Vol 3, No 1, pp. 90-96 .
37.
Walker, D. (2000), ‘You find the evidence, we’.l pick the policy’, The Guardian February 15.
38.
Williams, N. (2002), ‘Evidence and policy: towards a new politico-administrative settlement’ , Political Quarterly, Vol 73, No 1, pp. 86-97 .
39.
Young, K. , Ashby, D. , Boaz, A. and Grayson, L. (2002), ‘Social science and the evidence-based policy movement’ , Social Policy and Society, Vol 1, No 3, pp. 215-224 .