The notions of ‘regulatory state’ and ‘Europeanisation’ have become increasingly current in recent years. This article analyses the extent to which the national regulatory state has been Europeanised, focusing in particular on network industry regulation in four European Union (EU) member states, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany and Sweden. It does so in three steps. First, four dimensions of Europeanisation are discussed, pointing to: different institutional constellations in which Europeanisation takes place, different Europeanisation ‘triggers’; institutional consequences of Europeanisation at the national level; and, finally, different dynamics of Europeanisation. Second, the article surveys regulatory reform in four EU member states, suggesting that national diversity remains prominent, whether in terms of organising network regulation, processes of reform or the utilisation of particular regulatory instruments to enhance transparency. Finally, the article considers the impact of the four dimensions of Europeanisation on the national regulatory state in network regulation. It suggests that, far from transforming national regulation, Europeanisation is associated with many different phenomena, allowing for continued national diversity and adding to existing policy cleavages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bennett, C.J. (1997), ‘Understanding ripple effects: the cross national adoption of policy instruments for bureaucratic accountability’ , Governance, Vol 10, No 3, pp. 213-233 .
2.
Benz, A. and Goetz, K.H. (1996), ‘The German Public Sector: National Priorities and the International Reform Agenda’, in A. Benz and K.H. Goetz (eds), A New German Public Sector? Reform, Adaptation and Stability, ( Aldershot: Darmouth ).
Borzel, T. (1999), ‘Towards Convergence in Europe? Institutional Adaptation to Europeanization in Germany and Spain’ , Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol 37, No 4, pp. 597-616 .
5.
Bulmer, S. and Burch, M. (1998), ‘Organizing for Europe: Whitehall, The British State and European Union’ , Public Administration, Vol 76, pp. 601-628 .
6.
Chalmers, D. (1997), ‘Judicial Preferences and the Community Legal Order’ , Modern Law Review, Vol 60, pp. 181-197 .
7.
Clayton, R. and Pontusson, J. (1998), ‘Welfare State Retrenchment Revisited: Entitlement Cuts, Public Sector Bargaining, and Inegalitarian Trends in Advanced Capitalist Societies’ , World Politics, Vol 51, No 1, pp. 67-98 .
8.
Department of Public Enterprise (2000), Governance and Accountability in the Regulatory Process (Dublin), March.
9.
DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1991), ‘Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality: The Iron Cage Revisited’, in P.J. DiMaggio and W. Powell (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis ( Chicago: Chicago University Press ).
10.
Döhler, M. (2001), ‘Das Modell der unabhangigen Regulierungsbehörde im Kontext des deutschen Regierungs- und Verwaltungssystems’ , Die Verwaltung, Vol 34, No 1, pp. 59-91 .
11.
Dyson, K. and Goetz, K.H. (2002), ‘Germany and Europe: Beyond congruence?’ Paper for Europeanisation of Germany conference, London, May 2002.
12.
Eberlein, B. (2001), ‘Institutional Change and Continuity in German Infrastructure Management: The Case of Electricity Reform’ , German Politics, Vol 9, No 3, pp. 81-104 .
13.
European Commission (1999), Fifth Report on the Implementation of the Telecommunications Regulatory Package, COM 537, 10 November.
14.
Gerber, D. (1998), Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus ( Oxford: Clarendon Press ).
15.
Goetz, K.H. (1996), ‘Integration policy in a Europeanized state: Germany and the Intergovernmental Conference 1996’ , Journal of European Public Policy, Vol 3, No 1.
16.
Gourevitch, P. (1978), ‘The second image reversed: the international sources of domestic politics’ , International Organization, Vol 32, No 4, pp. 881-911 .
17.
Grande, E. and Eberlein, B. (2000), ‘Der Aufstieg des Regulierungsstaates im Infrastrukturbereich’, in R. Czada and H. Wollmann (eds), Von der Bonner zur Berliner Republik - 10 Jahre Deutsche Einheit ( Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag ).
18.
Hall, C. , Scott, C. and Hood, C. (2000), Telecommunications Regulation ( London: Routledge ).
19.
Héritier, A. (2001a), ‘Differential Europe: The European Union Impact on National Policymaking’, in A. Heritier , D. Kerwer , C. Knill , D. Lehmkuhl , M. Teutsch and A-C. Douillet , Differential Europe: The European Union Impact on National Policy-making ( Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield ).
20.
Héritier, A. (2001b), ‘The Politics of Public Services in European Regulation’, Max Planck Research Group on Common Goods, preprint 2001/1.
21.
Heretier, A. (1997), ‘Market-making policy in Europe: its impact on member state policies: The case of road haulage in Britain, the Netherlands, Germany and Italy’ , Journal of European Public Policy, Vol 4, No 4, pp. 539-555 .
22.
Hodson, D. and Maher, I. (2001), ‘The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance: The Case of Soft Economic Policy Co-ordination’ , Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol 39, No 4, pp. 719-746 .
23.
Hood, C. , Scott, C. , James, O. , Jones, G. and Travers, T. (1999), Regulation Inside Government ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).
24.
Kassim, H. , Peters, B.G. and Wright, V. (eds) (2000), The National Co-ordination of EU Policy: the domestic level ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).
25.
Knill, C. (2001a), ‘Reforming Transport Policy in Britain: Concurrence with Europe but Separate Development’, in A. Héritier , D. Kerwer , C. Knill , D. Lehmkuhl , M. Teutsch and A.-C. Douillet , Differential Europe: The European Union Impact on National Policy-making ( Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield ).
26.
Knill, C. ’ (2001b), The Europeanisation of National Administrations ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).
27.
Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2002), ‘The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three Europeanization mechanisms’ , European Journal of Political Research, Vol 41, No 2, pp. 255-280 .
28.
Konkurrensverket (2000), Competition in Sweden during the 90s: Problems and Proposals (Stockholm).
29.
Lodge, M. (2003), ‘Explaining Institutional Choice and Policy Transfer: The Case of British and German Railway Reform’, Governance, forthcoming.
30.
Lodge, M. (2000), ‘Isomorphism of national policies? The “Europeanisation” of German Competition and Public Procurement Law’ , West European Politics, Vol 23, No 1, pp. 89-107 .
31.
Lodge, M. and Hood, C. (2002), ‘Pavlovian Policy Responses to Media Feeding Frenzies? Dangerous Dogs Regulation in Comparative Perspective’ , Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol 10, No 1, pp. 1-13 .
32.
Majone, G. (1999), ‘The Regulatory State and its Legitimacy Problems’ , West European Politics, Vol 22, No 1, pp. 1-24 .
33.
Majone, G. (1997), ‘From the Positive to the Regulatory State - Causes and Consequences from Changes in the Modes of Governance’ , Journal of Public Policy, Vol 17, No 2, pp. 139-167 .
34.
Majone, G. (1989), Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process ( New Haven: Yale University Press ).
35.
Menon, A. and Wright, V. (1998), ‘The Paradoxes of “Failure”: British EU Policy Making in Comparative Perspective’ , Public Policy and Administration, Vol 13, No 4, pp. 46-66 .
36.
ODTR (2001a), ‘Codes of Practice for the Handling of Consumer Complaints by Telecommunications Operators’, Consultation Report, 01134, April.
37.
ODTR (2001b), ‘Codes of Practice for the Handling of Consumer Complaints by Telecommunications Operators’, Decision Note, D13101, 29th August.
38.
OECD (2001), Regulatory Reform in Ireland ( Paris: OECD ).
39.
Peters, B.G. (1991), The Politics of Taxation ( Oxford: Blackwell ).
40.
Premfors, R. (1998), ‘Reshaping the Democratic State: Swedish Experiences in a Comparative Perspective’ , Public Administration, Vol 76, No 1, pp. 141-159 .
41.
Prosser, T. (1997), Law and the Regulators ( Oxford: Clarendon Press ).
Radaelli, C. (2000), ‘Whither Europeanization? Concept Stretching and Substantive Change’ , European Integration online papers, Vol 4, No 8, http://eiop/or/at/eiop/texte/2000-008a.htm.
45.
Risse, T. , Green-Cowles, M. and Caporaso, J. (2001), ‘Europeanization and Domestic Change: Introduction’, in M. Green-Cowles , J. Caporaso and T. Risse (eds), Transforming Europe ( Ithaca: Cornell University Press ).
46.
Sabatier, P.A. (1988), ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe’ , Journal of European Public Policy, Vol 3, No 1, pp. 98-130 .
47.
Schmidt, S. (1996), ‘Sterile Debates and Dubious Generalizations: European Integration Theory Tested by Telecommunications and Energy’ , Journal of Public Policy, Vol 16, pp. 233-271 .
48.
Schmidt, S. (1998) Liberalisierung in Europa ( Frankfurt: C. Campis ).
49.
Schmidt, V. (2001), ‘Europeanization and the Mechanics of Economic Policy Adjustment’ , European Integration online papers, Vol 5, No 6, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001/006.htm.
50.
Schroter E. (2001), ‘Staats- und Verwaltungsreformen in Europa: International Trends und nationale Profile’, in E. Schroter (ed.), Empirische Policy- und Verwaltungsforschung ( Opladen: Leske & Budrich ).
51.
Scott, C. (2000a), ‘Accountability in the Regulatory State’ , Journal of Law and Society, Vol 27, No 1, pp. 38-60 .
52.
Scott, C. (2000b), ‘Services of General Interest in EC Law: Matching Values to Regulatory Technique in the Public and Privatised Sectors’ , European Law Journal, Vol 6, No 4, pp. 310-325 .
53.
Stirton, L. and Lodge, M. (2001), ‘Transparency Mechanisms: Building Publicness into Public Services’ , Journal of Law and Society, Vol 28, No 4, pp. 471-489 .
54.
Stone Sweet, A. and Sandholtz, W. (1997), ‘European integration and supranational governance’ , Journal of European Public Policy, Vol 4, No 3, pp. 297-317 .
55.
Teague, P. (1999), ‘Reshaping Employment Regimes in Europe: Policy Shifts Alongside Boundary Change’ , Journal of Public Policy, Vol 19, No 1, pp. 33-62
56.
Thatcher, M. (2002), ‘Analysing Regulatory Reform in Europe’ , Journal of European Public Policy, Vol 9, No 6, forthcoming.
57.
Thatcher, M. (2000), ‘The National Politics of European Regulation: Institutional Reform in Telecommunications’ , Current Politics and Economics of Europe, Vol 9, No 4, pp. 387-405 .
58.
Thatcher, M. (1999), ‘The Europeanisation of Regulation? The Case of Telecommunications’, EUI working paper 99/22, European University Institute .
59.
Thatcher, M. (1995), ‘Regulatory Reform and Internationalisation in telecommunications’, in Hayward, J. (ed.), Industrial Enterprise and European Integration ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).
60.
Wessels, W. (1997), ‘An ever closer union? A dynamic macropolitical view on integration processes’ , Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol 35, No 2, pp. 267-299 .
61.
Young, A. and Wallace, H. (2000), Regulatory politics in the enlarging European Union ( Manchester: University of Manchester Press ).
