This article subjects the existing literature on the concept of Europeanisation to critical scrutiny. It begins by providing a general discussion of the methodology of concept formation. It then goes on to assess five current usages of the tern Europeanisation, before providing an alternative definition. The main argument pursued here is that academics have been too quick to conceptualise Europeanisation as a process which is capable of producing certain effects. Consequently, not enough time has been spent on the subject of what Europeanisation actually is (and, indeed, whether it exists). Unless scholars refocus their efforts towards the subject of Europeanisation, there is a danger of misrepresenting or reifying its supposed effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen, S.S. and Eliassen, K.A. (2001), ‘Introduction: the EU as a New Political System’, in S.S. Andersen and K.A. Eliassen (eds), Making Policy in Europe (2nd edn) ( London: Sage ).
2.
Bierstedt, R. (1959), ‘Nominal and Real definitions in Sociological Theory’, in L. Gross (ed.), Symposium on Sociological Theory ( New York, Evanston and London: Harper and Row ).
3.
Börzel, T. (1999), ‘Towards Convergence in Europe? Institutional Adaptation to Europeanisation in Germany and Spain’ , Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol 37, No 4, pp. 573-596 .
4.
Buller, J. (2000), National Statecraft and European Integration: the Conservatives and the European Union, 1979-97 ( London: Pinter ).
5.
Bulpitt, J. (1995), ‘Historical Politics: Macro, In-Time, Governing Regime Analysis’, in Lovenduski, J. and Stanyer, J. (eds), Contemporary Political Studies 1995, Vol. Two ( Belfast: Political Studies Association ).
6.
Buzan, B. (1995), ‘The Level of Analysis Problem in International relations Reconsidered’, in K. Booth and S. Smith (eds), International Relations Theory Today ( Cambridge: Polity ).
7.
Campanella, M. (2001), ‘European Monetary Union: Economic versus Political Integration and the Limits of Supranationalism’, in S.S. Andersen and K.A. Eliassen (eds), Making Policy in Europe (2nd edn) ( London: Sage ).
8.
Caporaso, J. and Jupille (2001), ‘The Europeanisation of Gender Equality Policy and Domestic Structural Change’, in M. Green Cowles , J. Caporaso and T. Risse (eds), Transforming Europe: Europeanisation and Domestic Change ( Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press ).
9.
Checkel, J.T. (2001), ‘The Europeanisation of Citizenship’, in M.G. Cowles , J. Caporaso and T. Risse (eds), Transforming Europe: Europeanisation and Domestic Change ( Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press ).
10.
Cole, A. and Drake, H. (2000), ‘The Europeanisation of the French Polity: Continuity, Change and Adaptation’ , Journal of European Public Policy, Vol 7, No 1, pp. 26-43 .
11.
Connolly, W. (1974), The Terms of Political Discourse ( D.C. Heath ).
12.
Cowles, M.G. , Caporaso, J. and Risse, T. (eds) (2001), Transforming Europe: Europeanisation and Domestic Change ( Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press ).
13.
Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. (1996), ‘Who Learns What From Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature’ , Political Studies, Vol 44, pp. 343-357 .
14.
Dumont, R.G. and Wilson, W.J. (1967), ‘Aspects of Concept Formation, Explication and Theory Construction in Sociology’ , American Sociological Review, Vol 32, pp. 985-995 .
15.
Dyson, K. and Featherstone, K. (1999), The Road to Maastricht: Negotiating Economic and Monetary Union ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).
16.
Dyson, K. (2000), ‘EMU as Europeanisation: Convergence, Diversity and Contingency’ , Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol 38, No 4, pp. 645-666 .
17.
Evans, M. and Davies, J. (1999), ‘Understanding Policy Transfer: A Multi-level, Multi-disciplinary Perspective’ , Public Administration, Vol 77, No 2, pp. 361-385 .
18.
Gerring, J. (1999), ‘What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences’ , Polity, Vol 31, No 3, pp. 357-393 .
19.
Harmsen, R. (1999), ‘The Europeanisation of National Administrations: A Comparative Study of France and the Netherlands’ , Governance, Vol 12, No 1, pp. 81-113 .
20.
Harrison, R.J. (1974), Europe in Question: Theories of Regional International Integration ( London: George Allen & Unwin ).
21.
Haverland, M. (2000), ‘National Adaptation to European Integration: the Importance of Institutional Veto Points’ , Journal of Public Policy, Vol 20, No 1, pp. 83-103 .
22.
Hay, C. and Marsh, D. (2000), ‘Introduction: Demystifying Globalisation’, in C. Hay and D. Marsh (eds), Demystifying Globalisation (Palgrave).
23.
Held, D. and McGrew (2000), ‘The Great Globalisation debate: An Introduction’, in D. Held and A. McGrew (eds), The Global Transformations Reader ( Cambridge: Polity ).
24.
Hirst, P. and Thompson, P. (2000), ‘Globalisation: A Necessary Myth’, in D. Held and A. McGrew (eds), The Global Transformations Reader ( Cambridge: Polity ).
25.
Hix, S. (1994), ‘The Study of the European Community: the Challenge to Comparative Politics’ , West European Politics, Vol 17, No 1, pp. 1-30 .
26.
Hix, S. and Goetz, K.H. (2000), ‘Introduction: European Integration and National Political Systems’ , West European Politics, Vol 23, No 4, pp. 1-26 .
27.
Jorgensen, K.E. (1997), ‘Review Article: Studying European Integration in the 1990s’ , Journal of European Public Policy, Vol 4, No 3, pp. 486-492 .
28.
Kassim, H. (2000), ‘Conclusion: National Co-ordination of EU Policy: Confronting the Challenge’, in H. Kassim , B. Guy Peters and V. Wright (eds), The National Co-ordination of EU Policy ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).
29.
Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (1999), ‘How Europe Matters: Different Mechanisms of Europeanisation’ , European Integration Online Papers, Vol 3, No 7, http://eiop.or.atleiop/texte/1999-007a.htm.
30.
Knill, C. (2001), The Europeanisation of National Administrations: Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).
31.
Kohler-Koch, B. (1999), ‘The Evolution and Transformation of European Governance’, in B. Kohler-Koch and R. Eising (eds), The Transformation of Governance in the European Union ( London: Routledge ).
32.
Ladrech, R. (1994), ‘Europeanisation of Domestic Politics and Institutions: the Case of France’ , Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol 32, No 1, pp. 69-88 .
33.
Laffan, B. , O’.onnell, R. and Smith, M. (2000), Europe's Experimental Union: Rethinking Integration ( London: Routledge ).
34.
Lawton, T. (1999), ‘Governing the Skies: Conditions for the Europeanisation of Airline Policy’ , Journal of Public Policy, Vol 19, No 1, pp. 91-112 .
35.
Lindberg, L. (1963), ‘Political Integration: Definitions and Hypotheses’, in B.F. Nelsen and Alexander C.G. Stubb (eds) (1994), The European Union: Readings on the Theory and Practice of European Integration (Lynne Rienner).
36.
Nagel, E. (1961), The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation ( London: Routledge & Kegan Paul ).
37.
Olsen, J.P. (2001), ‘The Many Faces of Europeanisation’, ARENA Working Papers, WPO1 /2.
38.
Pentland, C. (1973), International Theory and European Integration ( London: Faber ).
39.
J. Peterson (1995), ‘Decision-Making in the European Union: Towards a Framework for Analysis’ , Journal of European Public Policy, Vol 2, No 1, pp. 69-94 .
40.
Pierre, J. and Stoker, G. (2000), ‘Towards Multi-Level Governance’, in P. Dunleavy et al. (eds), Developments in British Politics 6 ( Basingstoke: Macmillan ).
41.
Radaelli, C. (2001), ‘Conceptualising Europeanisation: Theory, Methods and the Challenge of Empirical Research’ , paper presented to the Europeanisation Residential Easter School, University of York, 24-25 March.
42.
Risse, T. , Cowles, M. Green and Caporaso, J. (2001), ‘Europeanisation and Domestic Change: Introduction’, in M. Green Cowles , J. Caporaso and T. Risse (eds), Transforming Europe: Europeanisation and Domestic Change ( Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press ).
43.
Risse, T. (2001), ‘A European Identity? Europeanisation and the Evolution of Nation-State Identities’, in M. Green Cowles , J. Caporaso and T. Risse (eds), Transforming Europe: Europeanisation and Domestic Change ( Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press ).
44.
Risse-Kappen, T. (1996), ‘Explaining the Nature of the Beast: International Relations and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the EU’ , Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol 34, No 1, pp. 53-79 .
45.
Rosamond, B. (2000), Theories of European Integration ( Basingstoke: Macmillan ).
46.
Ruggie, J. (1998), Constructing the World Polity ( London: Routledge ).
47.
Sartori, G. (1970), ‘Concept Misinformation in Comparative Politics’ , American Political Science Review, Vol 64, No 4, pp. 1033-1053 .
48.
Sartori, G. (1984), ‘Guidelines for Concept Analysis’, in G. Sartori (ed.), Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis ( Beverly Hills: Sage ).
49.
Singer, J.D. (1961), ‘The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations’, in K. Knorr and S. Verba (eds), The International System: Theoretical Essays ( Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press ).
50.
Wallace, H. (2000), ‘Europeanisation and Globalisation: Complimentary or Contradictory Trends?’ , New Political Economy, Vol 5, No 3, pp. 369-382 .
