The Role of Competition and Competitiveness in Best Value in England and Wales

Abstract

The Best Value regime in England and Wales has already proven its worth during the pilot phase from 1997-2000 - it has led to distinctively different approaches in local government to consultation, to performance comparisons and performance review, and to partnership working. It appears that it has not yet made such obvious progress in the use of competitive mechanisms in best value authorities. However, this underplays the progress made since 1997. With the abolition of CCT in the pilots, evidence is emerging of a new maturity in local government's relationship with the private sector. In some authorities, this is evidenced merely by the fact that they are, at last, prepared to recognise the inevitability of the mixed economy of provision and are prepared to work within it. This article maps out the changing response of the Best Value pilot authorities to the issues of 'competitiveness' and competition, and uses four case studies to highlight emerging lessons.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bovaird, T. (1998), Achieving Best Value Through Competition, Benchmarking and Performance Networks, Warwick/DETR Best Value Series Paper No. 6, ( Coventry: Warwick Business School and DETR ).

Cabinet Office (1993), The Government's Guide to Market Testing, ( London: Stationery Office ).

Cabinet Office (1998), Better Quality Services: A Handbook on Creating Public/Private Partnerships through Market Testing and Contracting Out ( London: Stationery Office ).

Construction Task Force (1998), Rethinking Construction. (The Egan Report), ( London: DETR ).

Davis H. and Walker B. (1998), Contracting for Best Value: Perspectives on Contractual Relationships and the Move to Best Value in Local Authorities , Paper presented to Public Services Research Unit Conference, Cardiff: Cardiff Business School).

Department of the Environment (1991), Competitive Tendering for Local Government Services: Initial Experiences, ( London: HMSO ).

Department of the Environment (1993), Competition and Service: the Impact of the Local Government Act 1988, ( London: HMSO ).

Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1997), Best Value: Twelve Provisional Principles, Reproduced in DETR (1998a).

Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1998a), Modernising Local Government: Improving Local Services Through Best Value, Green Paper, March 1998, ( London: DETR ).

10.

Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1998b), Modern Local Government: In Touch With The People, White Paper, July 1998, Cm 4013, ( London: Stationery Office ).

11.

Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1999a), Local Government Act 1999 Part One: Best Value, Circular 10/99, ( London: DETR ).

12.

Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1999b), Improving Local Public Services: Interim Evaluation of the Best Value Pilot Programme. Report of National Evaluation Team, ( London: DETR ).

13.

Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2000), Best Value in Housing Framework, ( London: DETR ).

14.

Filkin, G. (1999), Starting to Modernise: Achieving Best Value, ( London: New Local Government Network ).

15.

Foot, J. (1998), How To Do Benchmarking: A Practitioner's Guide, ( Epsom: Inter Authorities Group ).

16.

Hewitt, F. and Bovaird, T. (1996), 'Trends in Strategic Purchasing Patterns: a Comparison Between Public and Private Sectors', International Research Symposium on Public Services Management, Aston University, Birmingham , 25-26 March 1996.

17.

Housing Corporation (1999), Best Value for Registered Social Landlords, ( London: Housing Corporation ).

18.

Local Government Association (1998), Competition and Best Value: Questiozs for government and Questions for Local Authorities, ( London: LGA ).