Collaboration with the ‘Third Sector’ - Issues of Accountability: Mapping Israeli Versions of this Problematic

Abstract

This article explores the possibility, expressed in the literature, that Third Sector Organisations present a solution to what has been called the crisis of accountability. The paper addresses conceptual issues of holding collaborative government to account. Using Israel's Third Sector as a case in point, we illustrate several problems in holding Third Sector Organisations to account. Some of these problems have been well established in the literature on the contract state. Others are unique or particularly salient to Third Sector Organisations. Amongst these is the image of Third Sector Organisations as "do gooders" staffed largely by volunteers and workers highly committed to worthy causes. Are problems of Third Sector accountability equally salient to collaborative as opposed to contracting and grants arrangements? We find examples of accountability problems in all modes of Government - Third Sector undertakings. Our findings suggest that collaborative ventures may stand a better chance at instituting effective controls, depending on the nature and quality of institutional arrangements. More formalised and comprehensive collaborative agreements might reduce the incidence of accountability problems. Comparison with other settings - the United States and the Third World - indicates that our illustration of the problematic of third sector accountability is broadly applicable.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auditor General of Canada (1999), Collaborative Arrangements: Issues for the Federal Government, April, 1999.

Berg, R. and Gordon, D. (eds.) (1989), Cooperation for International Development: The United States and the Third World in the 1990s, ( Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner ).

Central Bureau of Statistics (1998), Survey of Income and Expenditure of Non-profit Institutions 1980-1996, ( Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics ).

Council of Better Business Bureaus (1998), www.bbb.org/.

Crozier, M. , Huntington, S. and Watanuki J. (1975), The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission, ( New York: New York University Press ).

Day, P. and Klein, R. (1987), Accountabilities, ( London: Tavistock ).

DeHartog, A. (1998), ‘State Support of Public Institutions - the Blooming of Special Monies’ , Mishpatim, Vol 29, pp. 75-107 .

Elazar, D. (1992), Urban Revitalization: Israel's Project Renewal and Other Experiences, ( Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America ).

General Accounting Office (1995a), Tax Exempt Organisations: Activities and IRS Oversight, ( Washington: General Accounting Office ).

10.

General Accounting Office (1995b), International Organisations: U.S. Participation in the United Nations Development Program, ( Washington: General Accounting Office ).

11.

Gidron, B. (1992), ‘A Resurgent Third Sector and its Relationship to Government in Israel’, in B. Gidron , R. Kramer and L. Salamon (eds), Government and the Third Sector: Emerging Relationships in Welfare States, ( San Francisco: Jossey-Bass ).

12.

Gidron, B. (1997), ‘The Evolution of Israel's Third Sector: The Role of Predominant Ideology’ , Voluntas, Vol.8, pp. 11-38 .

13.

Janowitz, M. (1976), Social Control of the Welfare State, ( New York: Elsevier ).

14.

Jenkins, B. and Gray, A. (1990), ‘Policy Evaluation in British Government: From Idealism to Realism’, in R. Rist (ed), Program Evaluation and the Management of Government: Patterns and Prospects Across Eight Nations, ( New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction ).

15.

Kearns, K. (1994), ‘The Strategic Management of Accountability in Nonprofit Organisations: An Analytical Framework’ , Public Administration Review, Vol. 54, pp. 185-192 .

16.

Kearns, K. (1996), Managing for Accountability, ( San Francisco: Jossey-Bass ).

17.

Kramer, R. (1993), ‘Reflections on the Voluntary Nonprofit Sector in Israel: An International Perspective’, Arnulf M. Pins Memorial Lecture, 21 February 1993, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem .

18.

Lazin, F. (1994), Politics and Policy Implementation: Project Renewal in Israel, ( Albany: State University of New York Press ).

19.

Leat, D. (1990), ‘Voluntary Organisations and Accountability: Theory and Practice’, in H. Anheier and W. Seibel (eds), The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organisations, ( Berlin: Walter de Gruyter , pp. 141-153).

20.

Light, P. (1995), Thickening Government: Federal Hierarchy and the Diffusion of Accountability, ( Washington: The Brookings Institution )

21.

National Council for Voluntary Organisations (1998), www.ncvo-vol.org.uk/.

22.

Normanton, E.L. (1966), The Accountability and Audit of Governments: a Comparative Study, ( Manchester: Manchester University Press ).

23.

Oxford English Dictionary (1992). (OED2 CD-ROM) ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).

24.

Palumbo, D. (1987), ‘Politics and Evaluation’, in D. Palumbo , (ed), The Politics of Program Evaluation, ( Newbury Park: Sage ).

25.

Rosen, B. (1986), Holding Government Bureaucracies Accountable, ( New York: Praeger ).

26.

Salamon, L. (1995), Partners in Public Service: Government-Non-Profit Relations in the Modern Welfare State, ( Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press ).

27.

Sharkansky, I. (1979), Wither the State? Politics and Public Enterprise in Three Countries, ( Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House ).

28.

Sharkansky, I. (1985), What Makes Israel Tick? or How Domestic Policy-Makers Cope with Constraints, ( Chicago: Nelson-Hall ).

29.

Smith, B. (1971), ‘Accountability and Independence in the Contract State’, in Smith, B. and Hague, D.C. (eds), The Dilemma of Accountability in Modern Government: Independence versus Control, ( London: Macmillan ), pp.3-69.

30.

Smith, R. and Lipsky, M. (1993), NonProfits for Hire: The Welfare State in an Age of Contracting, ( Cambridge: Harvard University Press ).

31.

State Comptroller (1990), Annual Report #40. ( Jerusalem: State Comptroller ).

32.

State Comptroller (1995), Annual Report #45. ( Jerusalem: State Comptroller ).

33.

State Comptroller (1996), Annual Report #46. ( Jerusalem: State Comptroller ).

34.

State Comptroller (1997), Annual Report #47. ( Jerusalem: State Comptroller ).

35.

State Comptroller (1998), Annual Report #48. ( Jerusalem: State Comptroller ).

36.

Sutherland, S. (1986), ‘The Politics of Audit: The Federal Office of the Auditor General in Comparative Perspective’ , Canadian Public Administration, Vol. 29, pp. 118-148 .

37.

Taylor, M. (1996), ‘Between Public and Private: Accountability and Voluntary Organisations’ , Policy and Politics, Vol. 24, pp. 57-72 .

38.

The Jerusalem Post (1986). Thursday, August 8, p.12-12.

39.

Weiss, C. (1987), ‘Where Politics and Evaluation Research Meet’, in D. Palumbo , (ed), The Politics of Program Evaluation, ( Newbury Park: Sage ).

40.

Weiss, T. (1996), Humanitarian Challenges and Intervention: World Politics and the Dilemmas of Help, ( Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press ).

41.

Wildavsky, A. (1972), ‘The Self-evaluating Organization’ , Public Administration Review, Vol. 32, pp. 509-520 .

42.

Yates, D. (1982), Bureaucratic Democracy: The Search for Democracy and Efficiency in American Government, ( Cambridge: Harvard University Press ).

43.

Yishai, Y. (1990), ‘State and Welfare Groups: Competition or Cooperation? Some Observations on the Israeli Scene’ , Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 19, pp. 215-236 .