The Blair Government's commitment to both devolution and decentralisation would appear impeccable. New Labour's affirmed objective is 'to put in place an integrated programme of measures to decentralise power in the United Kingdom'. However, this article asserts that the Blair Government has thus far failed to deliver genuine decentralisation of political (as opposed to administrative) power to the regions of England beyond London. The combination of the Government's modernisation programme and the Comprehensive Spending Review has, instead, imposed tight centrally-defined controls on public policy and services, including those which are delivered on a decentralised basis. The resulting further centralisation of control over policy and resources is illustrated by a an analysis of developments in enterprise policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arzeni, S. (1996), 'Introduction' to OECD, Networks of Enterprises and Local Development, (Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development).
2.
Barker, A. with Byrne, I. & Veall, A. (2000), Ruling by Task Force: Politico's Guide to Labour's New Elite, (London: Politico's in association with the Democratic Audit).
3.
Brown, G. (1998), 'Chancellor's Speech at the CBI President's Dinner ', 22 April, HM Treasury News Release 57/98.
4.
Brown, G. (1999), 'Modernising the British Economy: The New Mission for the Treasury', Institute of Fiscal Studies 30th Anniversary Lecture, 27 May, HMT News Release 86/99.
5.
Cabinet Office (1999), Modernising Government, Cm 4310, (London: The Stationery Office).
6.
Caborn, R. (1999), 'Regional Development Agencies: Labour's Regional Agenda', The Regional Review, Vol. 11, pp. 1-2.
7.
Chisholm, M. (1999), 'Editorial: Central Control of Local Expenditure ', Public Money & Management, July-September, pp.3-5.
8.
Detr (1997), 'John Prescott Promises a Radical Approach to the Regions', Department of the Environment Press Release 194, 30 May.
9.
Detr (1999a), Guidance to Regional Development Agencies, (London: Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions) (available at http//:www.local-regions.detr.gov.uk/rda/guide/supra03.htm ).
10.
Detr (1999b), Supplementary Guidance to Regional Development Agencies, (London: Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions) (available at http//:www.local-regions.detr.gov.uk/rdalguide/supra03.htm ).
11.
DfEE ( 1999), 'Business Gets Biggest Say in Learning and Skills Network ', DfEE News Release 473/99, 28 October.
12.
DfEE (2000), The Learning and Skills Council: Funding Flows and Business Processes, ( London: Department for Education and Employment).
13.
Dilnot, A. & Johnson, P. (1997), Election Briefing 1997, (London : Institute for Fiscal Studies).
14.
Dti (1999), Trade and Industry. The Government's Expenditure Plans 1999-2000 to 2001-2002, ( London: Department of Trade and Industry).
15.
Eesc (1998), The Relationship between TECs and the Proposed Regional Development Agencies. Fourth Report from the House of Commons Education and Employment Committee, Session 1997-8, HC 265, (London: The Stationery Office).
16.
Etrasc (1997), Regional Development Agencies. First Report from the House of Commons Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Committee, Session 1997-8, HC 415, (London: The Stationery Office).
17.
Etrasc, (1998), Government Response to the First Report of the Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Committee Report. Regional Development Agencies, Session 1997-8, HC 645, (London: The Stationery Office)
18.
Foster, J. (1995), 'MPs attack powers of regional "viceroys"', Independent on Sunday, 5 February.
19.
Greer, A. & Hoggett, P. (1999), 'Public Policies, Private Strategies and Local Public Spending Bodies', Public Administration, Vol.77, No.2, pp.235-56.
20.
Hctisc, (1995), Regional Industrial Policy. Fourth Report from the House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee, Session 1994-5, HC 365-I, ( London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office).
21.
Hctisc, (1999), Small Business and Enterprise. Thirteenth Report from the House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee, Session 1998-9, HC 330, ( London: The Stationery Office).
22.
Hmt (1998), Public Services for the Future: Modemisation, Reform, Accountability: Comprehensive Spending Review: Public Service Agreements 1999-2002, Cm 4181, (London: HM Treasury).
23.
Hmt (1999), The Government's Measures of Success. Output and Performance Analyses, ( London: HM Treasury).
24.
Hmt (2000), 'Gordon Brown Calls for Enterprise for All: New figures show differences in small business creation around the country', HM Treasury News Release 80/00, 23 June.
25.
Huggins, R. (1997), 'Competitiveness and the Global Region: The Role of Networking' in J.Simmie (ed.), Innovation, Networks and Learning Regions? (London : Jessica Kingsley with the Regional Studies Association ).
26.
Huggins, R. (2000), An Index of Competitiveness in the UK: Local, Regional and Global Analysis, (Cardiff: Centre for Advanced Studies).
27.
Irvine, D. (1998), 'Government's Programme of Constitutional Reform ', Lecture to the Constitution Unit by Lord Irvine of Lairg, the Lord Chancellor, Church House, Westminster, 8 December, http://www.open.gov.uk/lcd/speeches/1998/lcconst.htm.
28.
Jackson, P. (1999), 'Central/Local Fiscal Relations: The Macroeconomic Dimension', Public Money & Management, July-September, pp.11-16.
29.
King, D. & Ma, Y. (1999), 'Central Government Control over Local Authority Expenditure: The Overseas Experience', Public Money & Management, July-September, pp.23-8.
30.
Labour Party (1997), New Labour: because Britain deserves better, (London: The Labour Party).
31.
Lee, S. ( 1999a), 'Yorkshire Forward or Backwards? The Limits of "New Regionalism" in the Governance of Yorkshire', in New Regional Strategies: Devolution, RDAs and Regional Chambers: Conference Proceedings of the Regional Studies Association Annual Conference, (London: Regional Studies Association), pp.57-60.
32.
Lee, S. ( 1999b), 'The Competitive Disadvantage of England' in K.Cowling (ed), Industrial Policy in Europe , (London: Routledge), pp.88-117.
33.
Lga, (2000), Regional Variations , (London: Local Government Association ) (Executive Summary available at http://www.lga.gov.uk/regions/index.htm ).
34.
Oecd, (1997), Best Practice in Policies for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (Paris : Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development ).
35.
Oughton, C. & Whittam, G. (1997), 'Competition and Cooperation in the Small Firm Sector', Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol.44, No.1, pp.2-30.
36.
Porter, M. (1998), 'Clusters and the New Economics of Competition ', Harvard Business Review, Vol.76, No.6, pp.77-90.
37.
Porter, M. (1999), 'Microeconomic Competitiveness: Findings from the 1999 Executive Summary' in World Economic Forum, The Global Competitiveness Report 1999 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp.32-9.
38.
Piu, (2000), Reaching Out: The Role of Central Government at Regional and Local Level, ( London: Performance and Innovation Unit, Cabinet Office ).
39.
Roberts, P. (1997), 'Whitehall et la Desert Anglais: Managing and Representing the UK Regions in Europe', in J.Bradbury & J.Mawson, (eds.), British Regionalism and Devolution: The Challenges of State Reform and European Integration, (London: Jessica Kingsley ), pp.254-72.
40.
Stewart, M. (1997), 'The Shifting Institutional Framework of the English Regions: The Role of the Conservative Party' in J.Bradbury & J.Mawson, (eds.), British Regionalism and Devolution: The Challenges of State Reform and European Integration (London: Jessica Kingsley ), pp.137-57.
41.
Tomaney, J. (1998), New Labour and the English Question, ( Sheffield University: Political Economy Research Centre).
42.
Watt, P. & Fender, J. (1999), 'Feasible Changes in the UK Controls on Local Government Expenditure', Public Money & Management, July-September, pp.17-22.
43.
Weir, S. & Hall, W. (eds) (1994), Ego Trip: Extra-governmental Organisations in the United Kingdom and their Accountability, (London : The Charter 88 Trust).
