Abstract
The study proposes a new, redaction-critical explanation for the strikingly ambiguous portrayal of Jacob and Levi in Jubilees 30–32. It argues that the original version of the chapters only referred to Jacob, who was pictured as the officiating priest of his generation. In contrast, all references to Levi belong to later editorial stages of the text, which claimed the respective role for Levi. While Levi's rise to the ancestral priestly figure par excellence is still reflected in the literary growth of Jubilees 30–32, the ALD represents a later stage in the development of the Levi tradition, when the patriarch's prominent priestly role was already established.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
