One little-noted requirement for the proper functioning of democratic institutions is public responsiveness to policy. A responsive public would adjust its preference for `more' or `less' policy in reaction to what policy-makers do. In this article we set out a theoretical model of how the salience of the issue domain conditions the feedback of policy outputs on public preferences, and we then show how this model can be applied in the European case. In assessing the model we employ data from all Eurobarometer surveys conducted in the 24-year period between 1971 and 1994 together with policy data from the Official Journal of the EC/EU. Our findings suggest that public preferences regarding European unification do reflect policy, though only as the salience of the domain has increased over time.
Abramowitz, Alan I.
(1994) `Issue Evolution Reconsidered: Racial Attitudes and Partisanship in the U.S. Electorate', American Journal of Political Science38: 1-24.
2.
Anderson, Christopher J.
(1995) `Economic Uncertainty and European Solidarity Revisited: Trends in Public Support for European Integration', in Carolyn Rhodes and Sonia Mazey (eds) The State of European Union, Vol. 3: Building a European Polity?Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
3.
Anderson, Christopher J.
and Karl Kaltenhaler (1996) `The Dynamics of Public Opinion toward European Integration, 1973-1993', European Journal of International Relations2: 175-199.
4.
Beck, Nathaniel
(1992) `The Methodology of Cointegration', Political Analysis4: 237-248.
5.
Brody, Richard A.
(1991) Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
Campbell, Angus
, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes (1960) The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
7.
CELEX (1995) CD-Rom data base. London: Context Electronic Publishers.
8.
Converse, Philip E.
(1964) `The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics', in David Apter (ed.) Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.
9.
Dalton, Russell J.
and Richard C. Eichenberg (1991) `Economic Evaluations and Citizen Support for European Integration', paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
10.
Dinan, D.
(1994) Ever-Closer Union? An Introduction to the European Community. London: Macmillan.
11.
Durr, Robert H.
(1993) `What Moves Policy Sentiment?', American Political Science Review87: 158-170.
12.
Easton, David
(1965) A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.
13.
Ferejohn, John A.
and James H. Kuklinski (eds) (1990) Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
14.
Franklin, Mark
, Michael Marsh, and Christopher Wlezien (1994) `Attitudes Toward Europe and Referendum Votes: A Response to Siune and Svensson', Electoral Studies13: 117-121.
15.
Geer, John G.
(1996) From Tea Leaves to Opinion Polls. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
Graber, Doris A.
(1989) Mass Media and American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
17.
Handley, David
(1981) `Public Opinion and European Integration: The Crisis of the 1970s', European Journal of Political Research9: 335-364.
18.
Hayward, Jack
(1995) The Crisis of Representation in Europe. London: Cass.
19.
Jones, Brian D.
(1994) Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Key, V. O. Jr
(1961) Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.
21.
Kinder, Donald E.
(1983) `Diversity and Complexity in American Public Opinion', in Ada W. Finifter (ed.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
22.
Lindberg, L.
and S. Scheingold (1970) Europe's Would-be Polity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.
Miller, Arthur H.
, Warren E. Miller, Alden S. Raine and Thad A. Browne (1976) `A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election', American Political Science Review70: 753-778.
24.
Miller, Warren E.
and Donald W. Stokes (1963) `Constituency Influence in Congress', American Political Science Review57: 45-56.
25.
Page, Benjamin I.
and Robert Y. Shapiro (1992) The Rational Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Popkin, Samuel L.
(1991) The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Repass, David E.
(1971) `Issue Salience and Party Choice', American Political Science Review65: 389-400.
28.
Stavridis, S.
(1992) `The Forgotten Question of the European Parliament's Current Lack of Legitimacy', Oxford International Review3: 27-29.
29.
Stimson, James
(1989) `The Paradox of Ignorant Voters But Competent Electorate', in Donald S. Lutz and Kent L. Tedin (eds) Perspectives on American and Texas Politics. Dubugue, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
30.
Thompson, Ian
(1989) The Documentation of the European Commnities: A Guide. London: Mansell.
31.
Urwin, Derek
(1995) The Community of Europe: A History of European Integation Since 1945,2nd edn.Harlow (Essex): Longman.
32.
Van der Eijk, Cees
and Mark N. Franklin (1996) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
33.
Wlezien, Christopher
(1995a) `The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending', American Journal of Political Science39: 981-1000.
34.
Wlezien, Christopher
(1995b) `On the Structure of Representation: Dynamics of Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion', paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
35.
Wlezien, Christopher
(1996) `Dynamics of Representation: The Case of US Spending on Defence', British Journal of Political Science26: 81-103.
36.
Wlezien, Christopher
and Malcolm Goggin (1993) `The Courts, Interest Groups, and Public Opinion About Abortion', Political Behavior15: 381-405.
