Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Hirshleifer, Jack
and
Eric Rasmusen
(1992 ) `Are Equilibrium Strategies Unaffected by Incentives?'
Journal of Theoretical Politics
4 : 343 -357 .
2.
Tsebelis, George
(1989 ) `The Abuse of Probability in Political Analysis: The Robinson Crusoe Fallacy' , American Political Science Review
83 : 77 -91 .
3.
Tsebelis, George
(1990 ) `Penalty Has No Impact on Crime: A Game Theoretic Analysis' , Rationality and Society
2 : 255 -286 .
4.
Tsebelis, George
(1991 ) `The Effect of Fines on Regulated Industries: Game Theory vs. Decision Theory' , Journal of Theoretical Politics
3 : 81 -101 .
5.
Tsebelis, George
(1993 ) `Penalty and Crime: Further Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Evidence' , Journal of Theoretical Politics
5 : 349 -374 .
6.
Tullock, Gordon
(1991 ) `Penalty Has No Impact on Crime: A Comment on Tsebelis' , Rationality and Society
3 : 142 -143 .
7.
Tullock, Gordon
(1995 ) `Further Comments on Penalty and Crime' , Journal of Theoretical Politics
7 (1 ): 93 -95 .