Abreu, Dilip
and Ariel Rubinstein (1988) `The Structure of Nash Equilibrium in Repeated Games with Finite Automata', Econometrica56: 1259-1281.
2.
Achen, Christopher H.
(1988) `A State with Bureaucratic Politics is Representable as a Unitary Rational Actor'. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
3.
Allison, Graham T.
(1971) Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.
4.
Alt, James E.
, Randall L. Calvert and Brian D. Humes (1988) `Reputation and Hegemonic Stability: A Game-Theoretic Analysis', American Political Science Review82: 445-466.
5.
Anderson, Paul
and Timothy J. McKeown (1987) `Changing Aspirations, Limited Attention, and War', World Politics40: 1-29.
6.
Arthur, W. Brian
(1991) `Designing Economic Agents that Act Like Human Agents: A Behavioral Approach to Bounded Rationality', American Economic Review81: 353-359.
7.
Aumann, Robert J.
(1987) `Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality', Econometrica55: 1-18.
8.
Binmore, Ken
(1988/89) `Modeling Rational Players, Parts I and II', Economics and Philosophy3: 179-214; 4:9-55.
9.
Binmore, Ken and Larry Samuelson (1990) `Evolutionary Stability in Repeated Games Played by Finite Automata'. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Michigan.
10.
Binmore, Ken
with Adam Brandenburger (1990) `Common Knowledge and Game Theory', in Ken Binmore, Essays on the Foundation of Game Theory, pp. 105-150. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
11.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce
(1990) `Pride of Place: The Origins of German Hegemony', World Politics43: 28-52.
12.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce
and David Lalman (1990) `Domestic Opposition and Foreign War', American Political Science Review84: 747-765.
13.
Cotter, Kevin D.
(1991) `Correlated Equilibrium in Games with Type-Dependent Strategies', Journal of Economic Theory54: 48-68.
14.
Ellsberg, Daniel
(1959) The Theory and Practice of Blackmail, RAND P-3883, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; reprinted in Oran Young (ed.) Bargaining: Formal Theories of Negotiation, pp. 343-63. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1975.
15.
Ellsberg, Daniel
(1960) The Crude Analysis of Strategic Choice. RAND P-2183. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
16.
Fogarty, Thomas
(1990) `Deterrence Games and Social Choice: Asymmetry, Aggregation of Preferences, and a Conjecture About Uncertainty', International Interactions15: 203-226.
17.
Gardner, Roy
and Elinor Ostrom (1990) `Rules and Games', Public Choice70: 121-149.
18.
Güth, Werner
(1990) `Game Theory's Basic Question - Who is a Player?: Examples, Concepts, and Their Behavioral Relevance', Journal of Theoretical Politics3 (4): 403-435.
19.
Haney, Patrick J.
, Roberta Q. Herzberg and Rick K. Wilson (1992) `Advice and Consent: Unitary Actors, Advisory Models and Experimental Tests', Journal of Conflict Resolution (forthcoming).
20.
Harsanyi, John C.
(1967/68) `Games With Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players, Parts I, II, III', Management Science14: 159-182, 320-334, 486-502.
21.
Harsanyi, John C.
(1982) `Subjective Probability and the Theory of Games: Comments on Kadane and Larkey's Paper', Management Science28: 120-124, 124-125.
22.
Heiner, Ronald A.
(1983) `The Origin of Predictable Behavior', American Economic Review83: 560-595.
23.
Herek, Gregory M.
, Irving Janis and Paul Huth (1987) `Decision-Making During International Crises', Journal of Conflict Resolution31: 203-226.
24.
Holland, John H.
and John H. Miller (1991) `Artificial Adaptive Agents in Economic Theory', American Economic Review81: 365-370.
25.
Jervis, Robert
(1989) `Rational Deterrence: Theory and Evidence', World Politics41: 183-207.
26.
Kadane, Joseph B.
and Patrick D. Larkey (1982) `Subjective Probability and the Theory of Games', Management Science28: 113-120, 124-124.
27.
Kalai, E.
and W. Stanford (1988) `Finite Rationality and Interpersonal Complexity in Repeated Games', Econometrica56: 397-410.
28.
Kilgour, D. Marc
and Frank C. Zagare (1991) `Credibility, Uncertainty, and Deterrence', American Journal of Political Science35: 305-334.
29.
Kreps, David M.
(1990a) A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30.
Kreps, David M.
(1990b) Game Theory and Economic Modelling. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
Kreps, David M.
and Robert Wilson (1982) `Sequential Equilibria', Econometrica50: 863-894.
32.
McGinnis, Michael D.
(1988) `The Delicate Balance of Analysis: Crisis Stability as an Ambiguous Symbol'. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association/Midwest, Columbus, Ohio, 11-12 November 1988.
33.
McGinnis, Michael D.
(1991) `Richardson, Rationality, and Restrictive Models of Arms Races', Journal of Conflict Resolution35: 443-473.
34.
McGinnis, Michael D.
and John T. Williams (1991) `Policy Uncertainty in Two-Level Games: Examples of Correlated Equilibria'. Revised version of a paper presented at the 31st Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Washington, DC, 10-14 April 1990.
35.
Morrow, James D.
(1989a) `Bargaining in Repeated Crises: A Limited Information Model', in Peter C. Ordeshook (ed.) Models of Strategic Choice in Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 207-228.
36.
Morrow, James D.
(1989b) `Capabilities, Uncertainty, and Resolve: A Limited Information Model of Crisis Bargaining', American Journal of Political Science33: 941-972.
37.
Myerson, Roger B.
(1991) Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
Nalebuff, B.
(1991) `Rational Deterrence in an Imperfect World', World Politics43: 313-335.
39.
Powell, Robert
(1987) `Crisis Bargaining, Escalation, and MAD', American Political Science Review81: 717-736.
40.
Powell, Robert
(1988) `Nuclear Brinkmanship with Two-Sided Incomplete Information', American Political Science Review82: 155-178.
41.
Powell, Robert
(1989a) `Crisis Stability in the Nuclear Age', American Political Science Review83: 61-76.
42.
Powell, Robert
(1989b) `Nuclear Deterrence and the Strategy of Limited Retaliation', American Political Science Review83: 503-519.
43.
Powell, Robert
(1990) Nuclear Deterrence Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Putnam, Robert D.
(1988) `Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games', International Organization42: 427-460.
45.
Scharpf, Fritz W. (1989) `Games Real Actors Could Play: The Problem of Complete Information'. MPIFG Discussion Paper, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln, Germany.
46.
Schelling, Thomas C.
(1960) The Strategy of Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
Schelling, Thomas C.
(1966) Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.
48.
Selten, Reinhard
(1991) `Evolution, Learning and Economic Behavior', Games and Economic Behavior3: 3-24.
49.
Simon, Herbert A.
(1957) Models of Man. New York: Wiley.
50.
Spear, Stephen E.
(1989) `Learning Rational Expectations Under Computability Constraints', Econometrica57: 889-910.
51.
Wagner, R. Harrison
. (1982) `Deterrence and Bargaining', Journal of Conflict Resolution26: 329-358.
52.
Wagner, R. Harrison
(1989) `Uncertainty, Rational Learning, and Bargaining in the Cuban Missile Crisis', in Peter C. Ordeshook (ed.) Models of Strategic Choice in Politics. University of Michigan Press, pp. 177-205.
53.
Wagner, R. Harrison
(1991) `Nuclear Deterrence, Counterforce Strategies, and the Incentive to Strike First', American Political Science Review85: 727-749.
54.
Wagner, R. Harrison
(1992) `Rationality and Misperception in Deterrence Theory', Journal of Theoretical Politics (2): 115-141.
55.
Williams, John T.
and Michael D. McGinnis (1991) `Bayesian Correlated Equilibria in Spatial Voting Games'. Revised version of paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC, 29 August to 1 September 1991.
56.
Wittman, Donald
(1989a) `Arms Control Verification and Other Games Involving Imperfect Detection', American Political Science Review83: 923-945.
57.
Wittman, Donald
(1989b) `Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results', Journal of Political Economy97: 1395-1424.
