This paper re-examines the relationship between structural explanations and indeterminacy within the context of chaos and chaotic processes. The analysis demonstrates that the logic of a wholly determinate structure is not incompatible with a complex, apparently indeterminate outcome. This fact has important consequences for explanation in the social sciences, and for the evaluation of indeterminacy in social and political processes. In particular, it suggests that indeterminacy is not necessarily a repudiation of structural explanations for social and political life because a determinate structure is fully capable of generating complex and even seemingly stochastic behavior. Thus, the central task of the social sciences is correctly seen as an identification of the structure and logic underlying social processes, including the logic and structure of indeterminacy.
Becker, George
(1978) `Comment on Lenski's “History and Social Change” ', American Journal of Sociology84: 1238-1241.
2.
Beddington, J. R.
, C. A. Free and J. H. Lawton (1975) `Dynamic Complexity in Predator—Prey Models Framed in Difference Equations', Nature255 (1 May): 58-60.
3.
Berelson, Bernard F.
, Paul F. Lazarsfeld and William N. McPhee (1954) Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
von Bortkiewicz, Ladislaus
(1898) Das Gesetz der Kleinen Zahlen. Leipzig: Tuebner.
5.
Boudon, Raymond
(1974) Education, Opportunity and Social Inequality. New York: Wiley.
6.
Boudon, Raymond
(1984) `The Individualistic Tradition in Sociology'. Symposium on `Micro and Macro Levels in Sociological Theories', Schloss Rauischholzhausen, 21-23 June.
7.
Boudon, Raymond
(1986) Theories of Social Change: A Critical Appraisal. Translated by J. C. Whitehouse Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
Burks, Arthur W.
(1977) Chance, Cause, Reason: An Inquiry into the Nature of Scientific Evidence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Durkheim, Emile
(1933) The Division of Labor in Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
10.
Durkheim, Emile
(1951) Suicide. New York: Free Press.
11.
Gigerenzer, Gerd
(1987) `Survival of the Fittest Probabilist: Brunswik, Thurstone, and the Two Disciplines of Psychology', in Lorenz Kruger, Gerd Gigerenzer and Mary S. Morgan (eds) The Probabilistic Revolution: Vol. 2, Ideas in the Sciences, pp. 49-72. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Gleick, James
(1987) Chaos. New York: Penguin.
13.
Grossmann, Siegfried
and Gottfried Mayer-Kress (1989) `Chaos in the International Arms Race', Nature337 (23 February): 701-704.
14.
Huckfeldt, Robert
(1983) `The Social Context of Political Change: Durability, Volatility, and Social Influence', American Political Science Review77 (December): 929-944.
15.
Huckfeldt, Robert
(1989) `Noncompliance and the Limits of Coercion: The Problematic Enforcement of Unpopular Laws', in Paul E. Johnson (ed.) Formal Theories of Politics: Mathematical Modelling in Political Science, vol. 12 of Mathematical and Computer Modelling, pp. 533-546.
16.
Huckfeldt, Robert
, Carol W. Kohfeld and Thomas W. Likens (1982) Dynamic Modeling: an Introduction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Key, V. O. Jr
and Frank Munger (1959) `Social Determinism and Electoral Decision: the Case of Indiana', in Eugene Burdick and Arthur J. Brodbeck (eds) American Voting Behavior, pp. 281-299. New York: Free Press.
18.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F.
, Bernard F. Berelson and Hazel Gaudet (1948) The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
Lenski, Gerhard
(1978) `Probabilism Reasserted: a Reply to Becker', American Journal of Sociology84: 1242-1245.
20.
Li, Tien-Yien
and James A. Yorke (1975) `Period Three Implies Chaos', American Mathematical Monthly82 (December): 985-992.
21.
Lorenz, Edward N.
(1963) `Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow', Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences20 (March): 130-141.
22.
Loye, David
and Riane Eisler (1987) `Chaos and Transformation: Implications of Nonequilibrium Theory for Social Science and Society', Behavioral Science32 (January): 53-65.
23.
May, Robert M.
(1974a) `Biological Populations with Nonoverlapping Generations: Stable Points, Stable Cycles, and Chaos', Science186 (November): 645-647.
24.
May, Robert M.
(1974b) Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25.
May, Robert M.
(1976) `Simple Mathematical Models with Very Complicated Dynamics', Nature261 (10 June): 459-467.
26.
May, Robert M.
and Warren J. Leonard (1975) `Nonlinear Aspects of Competition between Three Species', SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics29 (September): 243-253.
27.
May, Robert M.
and George G. Oster (1976) `Bifurcations and Dynamic Complexity in Simple Ecological Models', American Naturalist110 (July-August): 573-599.
28.
Nisbet, Robert
(1969) Social Change and History. New York: Oxford.
29.
Oberschall, Anthony
(1987) `The Two Empirical Roots of Social Theory and the Probability Revolution', in Lorenz Kruger, Gerd Gigerenzer and Mary S. Morgan (eds) The Probabilistic Revolution: Vol. 2, Ideas in the Sciences, pp. 103-134. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
Ornstein, D. D.
(1989) `Ergodic Theory, Randomness, and “Chaos'' ', Science243 (13 January): 182-244.
31.
von Plato, Jan
(1987) `Probabilistic Physics the Classic Way', pp. 379-408 in Lorenz Kruger, Gerd Gigerenzer and Mary S. Morgan (eds) The Probabilistic Revolution: Vol. 2, Ideas in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
Saperstein, Alvin M.
(1984) `Chaos - a Model for the Outbreak of War', Nature309 (24 May): 303-305.
33.
Saperstein, Alvin M.
and Gottfried Mayer-Kress (1988) `A Nonlinear Dynamical Model of the Impact of SDI on the Arms Race', Journal of Conflict Resolution32 (December): 636-670.
34.
Schrodt, Philip A. (1980) `The Role of Stochastic Models in International Relations Research'. Mimeo, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
35.
Shackle, G. L. S.
(1969) Decision, Order, and Time in Human Affairs, rev. edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Shackle, G. L. S.
(1972) Epistemics and Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Smith, J. Maynard
(1968) Mathematical Ideas in Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Smith, J. Maynard
(1974) Models in Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Stokes, Donald E.
(1966) `Some Dynamic Elements of Contests for the Presidency', American Political Science Review60: 19-28.
40.
Suppes, Patrick
(1984) Probabilistic Metaphysics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
41.
Theil, Henri
(1971) Principles of Econometrics. New York: Wiley.
42.
Tsebelis, George
(1989) `The Abuse of Probability in Political Analysis: the Robinson Crusoe Fallacy', American Political Science Review83 (March): 77-92.
43.
Weber, Max
(1962) Basic Concepts in Sociology. Chapter 1 of Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Originally published posthumously in 1925, and translated by H. P. Secher. New York: Philosophical Library.
44.
Wildavsky, Aaron
(1974) The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Little-Brown.
