We expand Denzau and Munger’s 1986 model of ‘How Unorganized Interests Get Represented’ to address cross-national differences in electoral systems. We look at how individual legislators allocate their efforts to serving unorganized constituents versus organized groups. Our model shows how the optimal allocation of effort is affected by differences in nominating processes and electoral rules. Our findings include the following: (1) Closed-list proportional representation (PR) makes legislators generally more responsive to interest groups and less responsive to unorganized voters than single-member districts (SMD). (2) This difference becomes smaller as the personal component of the SMD vote diminishes. (3) Legislators elected via lists in a mixed system may be even less responsive to the unorganized than legislators in a pure list system.
Arnold, R. Douglas
(1990) The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
Bagehot, Walter
(1936) The English Constitution. London: Humphrey Milford.
3.
Baker, David
, Andrew Gamble, Steve Ludlam and David Seawright (1999) ‘Backbenchers with Attitude: A Seismic Study of the Conservative Party and Dissent on Europe’, in Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz (eds) Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, pp. 72-93. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
4.
Bawn, Kathleen
, Gary W. Cox and Frances Rosenbluth (1999) ‘Measuring the Ties That Bind: Electoral Cohesiveness in Four Democracies’, in Bernard Grofman, Sung-Chull Lee Edwin Winckler and Brian Woodall (eds) Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Imbedded Institution, pp. 300-316. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
5.
Cain, Bruce
, John A. Ferejohn and Morris P. Fiorina (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Carey, John M.
and Matthew Soberg Shugart (1995) ‘Incentives to Cultivate the Personal Vote’, Electoral Studies14(4): pp. 417-439.
7.
Cohen, Linda
and Roger Noll (1991) ‘The Political Discount Rate’, CEPR Working Paper. Stanford University.
8.
Cohen, Marty
, David Karol, Hans Noel and John Zaller (2001) ‘Beating Reform: The Resurgence of Parties in Presidential Nominations’, Unpublished manuscript, UCLA.
9.
Cox, Gary W.
(1987) The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Cox, Gary W.
and Mathew D. McCubbins (1993) Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11.
Cox, Karen
and Leonard J. Schoppa (1998) ‘The Consequences of “Sticky Voting” in Mixed Member Electoral Systems’, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, Massachusetts, 3-6 September.
12.
Cox, Gary W.
and Michael F. Thies (1998) ‘The Cost of Intraparty Competition: The Single, Nontransferable Vote and Money Politics in Japan’, Comparative Political Studies31(3): 267-291.
13.
Dahl, Robert
(1956) A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Denzau, Arthur T.
and Michael C. Munger (1986) ‘Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests Get Represented’, American Political Science Review80: 89-106.
15.
Downs, Anthony
(1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.
16.
Duverger, Maurice
(1953) Political Parties. New York: Wiley.
17.
Fiorina, Morris
(1976) Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Fiorina, Morris
(1982) ‘Legislative Choice of Regulatory Forms’, Public Choice39: 33-61.
19.
Fiorina, Morris
and Roger Noll (1979) ‘Majority Rule Models and Legislative Elections’, Journal of Politics41(4): 1081-1104.
20.
Hall, Richard L.
and Frank W. Wayman (1990) ‘Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees’, American Political Science Review84(3): 797-820.
21.
Jewell, Malcolm E.
and Gerhard Loewenberg (1979) ‘Editor’s Introduction: Toward a New Model of Legislative Representation’, Legislative Studies Quarterly4: 485-498.
22.
Katz, Richard S.
(2001) ‘Reforming the Italian Electoral Law, 1993’, in Matthew Soberg Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, pp. 96-122. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Lancaster, Thomas D.
(1986) ‘Electoral Structures and Pork Barrel Politics’, International Political Science Review7(1): 67-81.
24.
Loewenberg, Gerhard
and Chong Lim Kim (1978) ‘Comparing the Representatives of Parliaments’, Legislative Studies Quarterly3: 27-49.
25.
Masket, Seth
(2001) ‘Dude Looks Like a Party’, Unpublished manuscript, UCLA.
26.
Mershon, Carol
and Gianfranco Pasquino, eds (1995) Italian Politics: Ending the First Republic. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
27.
Moser, Robert
(2001) ‘The Consequences of Russia’s Mixed-Member Electoral System’, in Matthew Soberg Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, pp. 494-518. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Norris, Pippa
(1996) ‘Legislative Recruitment’, in Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi, and Pippa Norris (eds) Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, pp. 184-215. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Pierce, Roy
(1999) ‘Mass-Elite Linkages and the Responsible Party Government Model of Representation’, in Warren Miller, Roy Pierce, Jacques Thomassen, Richard Herrera, Soeren Holmberg, Peter Esaiasson and Bernhard Wessels (eds) Policy Representation in Western Democracies, pp. 9-32. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
Radice, Lisanne
, Elizabeth Vallance and Virginia Willis (1990) Member of Parliament: The Job of a Backbencher, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.
31.
Schwartz, Thomas
(1994) ‘Representation As Agency and the Pork Barrel Paradox’, Public Choice78: 3-21.
32.
Searing, Donald
(1994) Westminster’s World: Understanding Political Roles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg
(2001) ‘“Extreme” Electoral Systems and the Appeal of the mixed Member Alternative’, in Matthew Soberg Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, pp. 25-51. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg
and Martin P. Wattenberg, eds (2001) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Stratmann, Thomas
and Martin Baur (2002) ‘Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation and the German Bundertag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ Across Electoral Systems’, American Journal of Political Science, 46(3): 506-514.
36.
Stokes, Donald
(1965) ‘A Variance Components Model of Political Effects’, in John Claunch (ed.) Mathematical Applications in Political Science. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.
37.
Thies, Michael F.
(2000) ‘On the Primacy of Party in Government: Why Legislative Parties Can Survive Party Decline in the Electorate’, in Russell J. Dalton and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds) Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Countries, pp. 238-257. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
Thies, Michael. F.
(2002) ‘Changing How the Japanese Vote: The Promise and Pitfalls of the 1994 Electoral Reform’, in John Fuh-sheng Hsieh and David Newman (eds) How Asia Votes, pp. 92-117. New York: Chatham House.
39.
Vowles, Jack
(1995) Toward Consensus? The 1993 Election in New Zealand and the Transition to Proportional Representation. Auckland, NZ: Auckland University.
40.
Weingast, Barry
, Kenneth Shepsle and Christopher Johnsen (1981) ‘The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics’, Journal of Political Economy89(4): 642-664.
41.
Whiteley, Paul F.
and Patrick Seyd (1999) ‘Discipline in the British Conservative Party: The Attitudes of Party Activists toward the Role of Their Members of Parliament’, in Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell and Richard S. Katz (eds) Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, pp. 53-71. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
42.
Wissenschaftliche Dienste des Deutschen Bundestages (1998) Materialen 127. Die Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestages, 1-13 Wahlperiode.
