This paper revisits two classical problems in the theory of voting—viz. the divided majority problem and the strategic revelation of information—in the light of evolutionarily founded partial Kantian morality. It is shown that, compared to electorates consisting of purely self-interested voters, such Kantian morality helps voters solve coordination problems and improves the information aggregation properties of equilibria, even for modest levels of morality.
AlgerILaslierJ-F (2020) Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: a new theory of voter turnout. Working Paper, Paris and Toulouse Schools of Economics.
2.
AlgerIWeibullJ (2013) Homo moralis: Preference evolution under incomplete information and assortative matching. Econometrica81: 2269–2302.
3.
AlgerIWeibullJ (2017) Strategic behavior of moralists and altruists. Games8(3): 38.
4.
AlgerIWeibullJ (2019) Evolutionary models of preference formation. Annual Review of Economics11: 329–354.
5.
ArratiaRGordonL (1989) Tutorial on large deviations for the binomial distribution. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology51: 15–131.
6.
Austen-SmithDBanksJS (1996) Information aggregation, rationality, and the Condorcet jury theorem. American Political Science Review90: 34–45.
7.
BenzAEbertCJgerG, et al. (eds.) (2011) Language, Games, and Evolution: Trends in Current Research on Language and Game Theory. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
8.
BergnerCLHatemiPK (2017) Integrating genenetics into the study of electoral behavior. In: Kai Arzheimer, Jocelyn Evans and Michael lewis-Beck (eds) The Sage Handbook of Electoral Behavior. Volume 1. London: Sage, 367–405.
9.
BinmoreK (1994) Playing Fair: Game Theory and the Social Contract. Cambridge: Mass. MIT Press.
10.
BlaisA (2000) To Vote Or Not to Vote? The Limits and Merits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
11.
BoutonLOgdenB (2021) Group-based voting in multicandidate elections. Journal of Politics83: 468–482.
12.
CoateSConlinM (2004) A group rule–utilitarian approach to voter turnout: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review94: 1476–1504.
13.
Condorcet (1785) Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.
14.
CoxGW (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
van DammeE (1997) Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
16.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
17.
DemichelisSWeibullJ (2008) Language, meaning, and games: A model of communication, coordination, and evolution. American Economic Review98(4): 1292–1311.
18.
FeddersenTPesendorferW (1997) Voting behavior and information aggregation in elections with private and common values. Econometrica65: 1029–1058.
19.
FeddersenTPesendorferW (1998) Convicting the innocent: The inferiority of unanimous jury verdicts under strategic voting. American Political Science Review92: 23–35.
20.
FeddersenTSandroniA (2006) A theory of participation in elections. American Economic Review96(4): 1271–1282.
21.
ForsytheRMyersonRRietzT, et al. (1993) An experiment on coordination in multi-candidate elections: The importance of polls and election histories. Social Choice and Welfare10(3): 223–247.
22.
GerardiDYarivL (2008) Information acquisition in committees. Games and Economic Behavior62: 436–459.
23.
GersbachHHahnV (2008) Should the invidual voting records of central bankers be published?. Social Choice and Welfare30: 655–683.
24.
GreenDPShapiroI (1994) Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
25.
HarsanyiJ (1980) Rule utilitarianism, rights, obligations and the theory of rational behavior. Theory and Decision12: 115–133.
26.
HarsanyiJ (1992) Game and decision theoretic models in ethics. In: R.J. Aumann and S. Hart (eds) Handbook of Game Theory Elsevier, volume 1, 669–707.
27.
KantI (1785) Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Trad: Mary Gregor and Jens Timmermann (2011) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A German-English Edition. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KoriyamaYSzentesB (2009) A resurrection of the Condorcet jury theorem. Theoretical Economics4: 227–252.
29.
LaslierJ-F (2003) The evolutionary analysis of signal games. In: P. Bourgine and J.-P. Nadal (eds) Cognitive Economics. Heidelberg : Springer, 281–291.
30.
LaslierJ-FWeibullJ (2013) An incentive-compatible Condorcet jury theorem. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics115(1): 84–108.
31.
LaffontJ-J (1975) Macroeconomic constraints, economic efficiency, and ethics: An introduction to kantian economics. Economica42: 430–437.
MyersonRWeberR (1993) A theory of voting equilibria. American Political Science Review87: 102–114.
38.
MyersonR (2002) Comparison of scoring rules in Poisson voting games. Journal of Economic Theory103: 219–251.
39.
MyersonRWeibullJ (2015) Tenable strategies and settled equilibria. Econometrica83(3): 943–976.
40.
NowakMASigmundK (2005) Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature437: 1293–1295.
41.
OstromE (1998) A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American political science association, 1997. American Political Science Review92(1): 1–22.
42.
PetersenMB (2015) Evolutionary political psychology. In: D. Buss (ed) Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. John Wiley, Vol. 2. 1084–1102.
43.
RoemerJ (2019) How We Cooperate. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44.
RousseauJ-J (1755) Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes. Reprinted in : Ecrits politiques, 1992, Paris: Le livre de Poche.
45.
ShubertG (1982) Evolutionary politics. Western Political Quarterly 36: 175–193.
46.
SeeleyT (2010) Honeybee Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
SidanusJKurzbanR (2013) Toward an evolutionary informed political psychology. In: L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, and J. S. Levy (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology Oxford University Press, 205–236.
48.
StephensonLBAldrichJHBlaisA (2018) The Many Faces of Strategic Voting: Tactical Behavior in Electoral Systems Around the World. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
49.
SumpterDJT (2010) Collective Animal Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
de WaalF (1996) Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
51.
WalkerRHKingAJMcNuttJW, et al. (2017) Sneeze to leave: African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) use variable quorum thresholds facilitated by sneezes in collective decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, vol. 284. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0347.
