I examine some political economy aspects of the capital–labor split. In a game-theoretic general equilibrium model, rent-seekers attempt to appropriate the output of manufacturing firms on the offensive end, while such firms safeguard their income on the defensive end. Then the presence of imperfect property rights is a breeding ground for social conflict and has two indirect consequences. First, it evens out changes in the gross (before-social-conflict) labor and capital shares of total output that are caused by changes in the aggregate factor endowments, leading to more rigid equilibrium factor shares. Second, if social conflict is more labor-intensive than manufacturing, weaker property rights lead to a larger equilibrium labor share.
AcemogluD (1995) Reward structures and the allocation of talent. European Economic Review39: 17–33.
2.
AcemogluDRestrepoP (2018) The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American Economic Review108(6): 1488–1542.
3.
AcemogluDRobinsonJA (2006) Economic backwardness in political perspective. American Political Science Review100(1): 115–131.
4.
AcemogluDJohnsonSRobinsonJA (2005) Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In: AghionPDurlaufSN (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1A. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 385–472.
5.
AntrasP (2004) Is the US aggregate production function Cobb–Douglas? New estimates of the elasticity of substitution. Contributions to Macroeconomics4(1): 4.
6.
BalandJ-MRobinsonJA (2012) The political value of land: Political reforms and land prices in Chile. American Journal of Political Science56: 601–619.
7.
BaumolWJ (1990) Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy98(5): 893–921.
8.
BengtssonEWaldenstormD (2018) Capital shares and income inequality: Evidence from the long run. Journal of Economic History78(3): 712–743.
9.
BlanchardOGiavazziF (2003) Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics118: 879–907.
MurphyKMShleiferAVishnyRW (1991) The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics106: 503–530.
28.
MurphyKMShleiferAVishnyRW (1993) Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth?American Economic Review83: 409–414.
29.
NorthDCThomasRP (1973) The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
PikettyT (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
31.
PikettyTSaezE (2014) Inequality in the long run. Science344(6186): 838–843.
32.
PolinskyMAShavellS (1992) Enforcement costs and the optimal magnitude and probability of fines. Journal of Law and Economics35(1): 133–148.
33.
RobinsonJATorvikRVerdierT (2006) Political foundations of the resource curse. Journal of Development Economics79: 447–468.
34.
SegalIWhinstonMD (2013) Property rights. In: GibbonsRRobertsJ (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 100–158.
35.
SkaperdasSSyropoulosC (2001) Guns, butter, and openness: On the relationship between security and trade. American Economic Review91(2): 353–357.
36.
StefanadisC (2010) Appropriation, property rights institutions, and international trade. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy2: 148–172.
37.
TullockG (1980) Efficient rent-seeking. In: BuchananJMTollisonRDTullockG (eds.) Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 97–112.
38.
UzawaH (1961) Neutral inventions and the stability of growth equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies28(2): 117–124.
