An agent may be able to address a task at different times, with the state of nature more favorable to the task in some periods than in others. Success on a task will therefore more greatly improve the agent’s reputation if he is constrained in choosing when to address the task than if he enjoys flexibility in timing. These considerations can explain why presidents emphasize achievements in their first 100 days in office, and why performance of the economy in only some periods of a president’s term affect elections.
BarronDNWestEHannanMT (1994) A time to grow and a time to die: Growth and mortality of credit unions in New York City, 1914–1990. American Journal of Sociology100(2): 381–421.
BeniersKJDurR (2007) Politicians’ motivation, political culture, and electoral competition. International Tax and Public Finance14(1): 29–54.
4.
BiglaiserGMezzettiC (1997) Politicians’ decision making with re-election concerns. Journal of Public Economics66(3): 425–447.
5.
FairRC (1978) The effect of economic events on votes for president. Review of Economics and Statistics60(2): 159–173.
6.
FrendreisJTatalovichRSchaffJ (2001) Predicting legislative output in the first one-hundred days, 1897–1995. Political Research Quarterly54(4): 853–870.
7.
GergenDR (1993) Give Clinton a chance. U.S. News & World Report114(May10): 92.
8.
GlazerARobbinsM (1985) How elections matter: A study of U.S. Senators. Public Choice46(2): 163–172.
9.
HessGDOrphanidesA (1995) War politics—An economic, rational-voter framework. American Economic Review85(4): 828–846.
10.
KaplowL (1986) An economic analysis of legal transitions. Harvard Law Review99(3): 509–617.
11.
KatzR (1982) The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly27(1): 81–104.
12.
MajumdarSMukandSW (2004) Policy gambles. American Economic Review94(4): 1207–1222.
13.
MaskinETiroleJ (2004) The politician and the judge: accountability in government. American Economic Review94(4): 1034–1054.
14.
MorrisS (2001) Political correctness. Journal of Political Economy109(2): 231–265.
15.
Ranger-MooreJ (1997) Bigger may be better, but is older wiser? Organizational age and size in the New York life insurance industry. American Sociological Review62(6): 903–921.
16.
RothenbergLSSandersMS (2000) Severing the electoral connection: Shirking in the contemporary Congress. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 310–319.
17.
RozellMJ (1989) The Press & the Carter Presidency. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
18.
SmartMSturmDM (2013) Term limits and electoral accountability. Journal of Public Economics107: 93–102.
19.
ZahaviAZahaviA (1997) The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin’s Puzzle. New York: Oxford University Press.
