AdlerESLapinskiJS (1997) Demand-side theory and congressional committee composition: a constituency characteristics approach. American Journal of Political Science41(3): 895–918.
2.
BaronDP (2000) Legislative organization with informational committees. American Journal of Political Science44(3): 485–505.
3.
BattagliniM (2002) Multiple referrals and multidimensional cheap talk. Econometrica70(4): 1379–1401.
4.
BendorJMeirowitzA (2004) Spatial models of delegation. American Political Science Review98(2): 293–310.
5.
CallanderS (2008) A theory of policy expertise. Quarterly Journal of Political Science3(2): 123–140.
6.
CallanderS (2011) Searching for good policies. American Political Science Review105(4): 643–662.
7.
ChenYEraslanH (2013) Informational loss in bundled bargaining. Journal of Theoretical Politics (this issue).
8.
ChiouF-Y (2011) The role of procedural commitment in informational theories of legislative organization. Journal of Theoretical Politics23(4): 532–558.
9.
CrawfordVPSobelJ (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica50(6): 1431–1451.
10.
DenzauATMacKayRJ (1983) Gatekeeping and monopoly power of committees: an analysis of sincere and sophisticated behavior. American Journal of Political Science27(4): 740–761.
11.
DiermeierD (1995) Commitment, deference, and legislative institutions. American Political Science Review89(2): 344–355.
12.
DiermeierDFeddersenTJ (2000) Information and congressional hearings. American Journal of Political Science44(1): 51–65.
13.
DionDHuberJD (1996) Procedural choice and the house committee on rules. Journal of Politics58(1): 25–53.
14.
DionDHuberJD (1997) Sense and sensibility: the role of rules. American Journal of Political Science41(3): 945–957.
15.
EpsteinDO’HalloranS (1999) Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FiorinaMP (1987) Comment: alternative rationales for restrictive procedures. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization3(2): 337–343.
17.
GailmardS (2002) Expertise, subversion, and bureaucratic discretion. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization18(2): 536–555.
18.
GailmardSPattyJW (2013) Stovepiping. Journal of Theoretical Politics (this issue).
19.
GilliganTWKrehbielK (1987) Collective decision-making and standing committees: an informational rationale for restrictive amendment procedures. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization3(2): 145–193.
20.
GilliganTWKrehbielK (1989) Asymmetric information and legislative rules with a heterogeneous committee. American Journal of Political Science33(2): 459–490.
21.
GilliganTWKrehbielK (1990) Organization of informative committees by a rational legislature. American Journal of Political Science34(2): 531–564.
22.
GrosecloseT (1994) Testing committee composition hypotheses for the U.S. Congress. Journal of Politics56(2): 440–458.
23.
HallRLGrofmanB (1990) The committee assignment process and the conditional nature of committee bias. American Political Science Review84(4): 1149–1166.
24.
KrehbielK (1990) Are congressional committees composed of preference outliers?American Political Science Review84(1): 149–163.
25.
KrehbielK (1991) Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
26.
KrehbielK (1997a) Restrictive rules reconsidered. American Journal of Political Science41(3): 958–964.
27.
KrehbielK (1997b) Rejoinder to ‘Sense and Sensibility’. American Journal of Political Science41(3): 958–964.
28.
KrishnaVMorganJ (2001) Asymmetric information and legislative rules: some amendments. American Political Science Review95(2): 435–452.
MaltzmanF (1995) Meeting competing demands: committee performance in the postreform house. American Journal of Political Science39: 653–682.
31.
MaltzmanF (1997) Competing Principals: Committees, Parties, and the Organization of Congress. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
32.
McCartyN (2012) The political economy of regulation and self-regulation in a complex industry. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University.
33.
McCubbinsMDNollRGWeingastBR (1987) Administrative procedures as instruments of control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization3(2): 243–277.
34.
MinozziW (2011) A jamming theory of politics. Journal of Politics73(2): 301–315.
35.
MinozziWWoonJ (2013) Lying aversion, lobbying, and context in a strategic experiment. Journal of Theoretical Politics (this issue).
36.
MorelliMVan WeeldenR (2013) Ideology and information in policymaking. Journal of Theoretical Politics (this issue).
37.
SchicklerELeeFE (2010) The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
ShepsleKA (1979) Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models. American Journal of Political Science23(1): 27–59.
39.
ShepsleKAWeingastBR (1981) Structure-induced equilibrium and legislative choice. Public Choice37(3): 503–519.
40.
StephensonMC (2011) Information acquisition and institutional design. Harvard Law Review124(6): 1422–1484.
41.
TingMMSnyderJMJrHiranoS. (2013) Elections and reform: the adoption of civil service systems in the U.S. states. Journal of Theoretical Politics (this issue).
42.
VoldenC (2002) A formal model of the politics of delegation in a separation of power system. American Journal of Political Science46(1): 111–133.
43.
VoldenCWisemanAE (2010) Formal approaches to the study of congress. In SchicklerELeeFE (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.
