The article considers Approval Voting for a large population of voters. It is supposed that voters evaluate the relative likelihood of pairwise ties among candidates based on statistical information about candidate scores. This leads them to vote sincerely and according to a simple behavioral rule we call the `Leader Rule'. At equilibrium, if a Condorcet-winner exists, this candidate is elected.
Bag, Parimal K., Hamid Sabourian, and Eyal Winter (2007) `Sequential Elimination vs. Instantaneous Voting' . Mimeo, University of Surrey.
2.
Banks, Jeffrey and John Duggan (2004) `Probabilistic Voting in the Spatial Model of Elections: The Theory of Office-motivated Candidates', in David Austen-Smith and John Duggan (eds) Social Choice and Strategic Decisions. Berlin : Springer.
3.
Bouton, Laurent and Micael Castanheira (2008) `One Person, Many Votes: Divided Majority and Information Aggregation'. Mimeo, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
4.
Brams, Steven J. and Peter C. Fishburn (1983) Approval Voting. Boston, MA: Birkhauser.
5.
Brams, Steven J. and Peter C. Fishburn (1985) `Comment on ``The Problem of Strategic Voting under Approval Voting'' and ``Rejoinder to Niemi''', American Political Science Review79: 816-19.
6.
Brams, Steven J. and Peter C. Fishburn (2005) `Going from Theory to Practice: The Mixed Success of Approval Voting', Social Choice and Welfare25: 457-74.
7.
Brams, Steven J. and M. Remzi Sanver (2003) `Voter Sovereignty and Election Outcome'. Mimeo, Istanbul Bilgi University.
8.
Brams, Steven J. and M. Remzi Sanver (2006) `Critical Strategies under Approval Voting: Who Gets Ruled in and Who Gets Ruled out', Electoral Studies25: 287-305.
9.
Colman, Andrew M. and Jonathan Stirk (1999) `Singleton Bias and Lexicographic Preferences among Equally Valued Alternatives', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization40: 337-51.
10.
Coughlin, Peter (1992) Probabilistic Voting Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Cox, Gary (1985) `Electoral Equilibrium under Approval Voting', American Journal of Political Science29: 112-18.
12.
Cox, Gary (1987) `Electoral Equilibrium under Alternative Voting Institutions', American Journal of Political Science31: 82-108.
13.
Dellis, Arnaud and Mandar Oak (2006) `Approval Voting with Endogenous Candidates', Games and Economic Behavior54: 47-76.
14.
De Sinopoli, Francesco, Bhaskar Dutta and Jean-François Laslier (2006) `Approval Voting: Three Examples' , International Journal of Game Theory35: 27-38.
15.
Downs, Anthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
16.
Duggan, John (2000) `Equilibrium Equivalence under Expected Plurality and Probability of Winning Maximization'. Mimeo, University of Rochester.
17.
Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos V. and Laura Martignon (2006) `Naïve Heuristics for Paired Comparisons: Some Results on Their Relative Accuracy' , Journal of Mathematical Psychology50: 488-94.
18.
Laffond, Gilbert, Jean-François Laslier and Michel Le Breton (1994) `Social Choice Mediators' , American Economic Review (proc.) 84: 448-543.
19.
Laslier, Jean-François (2000) `Interpretation of Electoral Mixed Strategies' , Social Choice and Welfare17: 283-92.
20.
Laslier, Jean-François (2004) `Strategic Approval Voting in a Large Electorate'. Working paper #2004-01, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris.
21.
Laslier, Jean-François and Karine Van der Straeten (2008) `A Live Experiment on Approval Voting', Experimental Economics11: 97-105.
22.
Lindbeck, Assar and Jorgen Weibull (1987) `Balanced Budget Redistribution as the Outcome of Political Competition', Public Choice52: 273-97.
23.
McKelvey, Richard and John Patty (2006) `A Theory of Voting in Large Elections', Games and Economic Behavior57: 155-80.
24.
Mandler, Michael (2007) `Large Bayesian Elections'. Mimeo, University of London.
25.
Milchtaich, Igal (2004) `Random Player Games', Games and Economic Behavior47: 353-88.
Myerson, Roger B. (1998) `Extended Poisson Games and the Condorcet Jury Theorem', Games and Economic Behavior25: 111-31.
28.
Myerson, Roger B. (2000) `Large Poisson Games', Journal of Economic Theory94: 7-45.
29.
Myerson, Roger B. (2002) `Comparison of Scoring Rules in Poisson Voting Games', Journal of Economic Theory103: 219-51.
30.
Myerson, Roger B. and Robert J. Weber (1993) `A Theory of Voting Equilibrium' , American Political Science Review87: 102-14.
31.
Newell, Ben R., Nicola J. Weston and David R. Shanks (2003) `Empirical Tests of a Fast-and-frugal Heuristic: Not Everyone ``Takes the Best''', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes91: 82-96.
32.
Niemi, Richard G. (1984) `The Problem of Strategic Voting under Approval Voting', American Political Science Review78: 952-58.
33.
Nunez, Matias (2007) `Approval Voting and the Poisson-Myerson Environment'. Working paper #2007-03, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris.
34.
Patty, John (2007a) `Generic Difference of Expected Vote Share and Probability of Victory Maximization in Simple Plurality Elections with Probabilistic Voters', Social Choice and Welfare29: 149-73.
35.
Patty, John (2007b) `Incommensurability and Issue Voting', Journal of Theoretical Politics19: 115-31.
36.
Peleg, Bezalel (1984) Game Theoretic Analysis of Voting in Committees . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Peress, Michael (2004) `A Comparison of Alternative Voting Rules'. Mimeo , University of Rochester.
38.
Roy, René (1943) `La Hiérarchie des besoins et la notion de groupes dans l'économie de Choix', Econometrica11: 13-24.
39.
Saari, Donald G. and Jill Van Newenhizen (1988) `The Problem of Indeterminacy in Approval, Multiple and Truncated Voting Systems' and `Is Approval Voting an ``Unmitigated Evil?'': A Response to Brams, Fishburn and Merrill', Public Choice59: 101-20 and 133-47.
40.
Suppes, Patrick, David M. Krantz, R. Duncan Luce and Amos Tversky (1989) Foundations of Measurement. Volume II: Geometrical, Threshold, and Probabilistic Representations. Academic Press.
41.
Timashev, A.N. (1997) `On Asymptotic Expansions in the Domain of Large Deviations for Binomial and Poisson Distributions', Theory of Probability and its Applications43: 89-98.
42.
Tversky, Amos (1972a) `Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice', Psychological Review79: 281-99.
43.
Tversky, Amos (1972b) `Choice by Elimination', Journal of Mathematical Psychology9: 341-67.
