This article develops an account of a theory of rational choice based on the
conception of rationality as a normatively justified correspondence between
interests and choices. In this conception, rationality is best thought of as a
property not of individual actions, but of a complex two-level phenomenon comprised
of the social justification of behavioral norms and of the everyday choices made
under these norms.
Aumann, Robert
and
Adam Brandenburger
(1995)
‘Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium’
, Econometrica63(5):
1161-1180
.
2.
Borgers, Tilman
(1996)
‘On the Relevance of Evolution and Learning to Economic Theory’
, Economic Journal106:
1274-1385
.
3.
Calvert, Randall L.
(1995) ‘The Rational Choice Theory of Social
Institutions: Cooperation, Coordination, and Communication’,
in
J.S. Banks
and
E. Hanushek
(eds) Modern Political Economy: Old Topics, New Approaches, pp.
216-267.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
4.
Calvert, Randall L.
and
James D. Johnson
(1998)
‘Rational Actors, Political Argument, and Democratic Deliberation’
, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political
Science Association.
5.
Davidson, Donald
(1980a) ‘Actions, Reasons, and
Causes’, in
D. DavidsonEssays on Actions and Events, pp. 3-20.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
6.
Davidson, Donald
(1980b) ‘Hempel on Explaining
Action’, in
D. Davidson
, Essays on Actions and Events, pp. 261-276.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
7.
Davidson, Donald
(1980c) ‘Mental Events’, in
D. Davidson
, Essays on Actions and Events, pp. 207-228.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
8.
Dickson, Eric
(2006)
‘Rational Choice Epistemology and Belief Formation in Mass Politics’
, Journal of Theoretical Politics18(4):
455-498
.
9.
Dowding, Keith
(2002)
‘Revealed Preference and External Reference’
, Rationality and Society14(3):
259-284
.
10.
Elster, Jon
(1989) The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
11.
Føllesdal, Dagfinn
(1982)
‘The Status of Rationality Assumptions in Interpretation and
Explanation of Action’
, Dialectica36:
301-316
.
12.
Hafer, Catherine
and
Dimitri Landa
(forthcoming)
‘Deliberation as Self-discovery and Institutions for Political Speech’
, Journal of Theoretical Politics.
13.
Hollis, Martin
(1994) The Philosophy of Social Science: An
Introduction.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
14.
Hollis, Martin
(1996) ‘Moves and Motives’,
in
M. HollisReason in Action: Essays in the Philosophy of Social Science, pp.
62-79.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
15.
Osborne, Martin J.
and
Ariel Rubinstein
(1998) ‘Games between Procedurally Rational
Players’,
American Economic Review
: 834-847.
16.
Pettit, Philip
(1993) The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society, and
Politics.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
17.
Raz, Joseph
(1999) ‘Explaining Normativity: On Rationality
and the Justification of Reason’, in
J. RazEngaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action, pp.
67-89.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
18.
Rubinstein, Ariel
(1991)
‘Comments on the Interpretation of Game Theory’
, Econometrica59(4):
909-924
.
19.
Samuelson, Larry
(1998) Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
20.
Satz, Debra
and
John Ferejohn
(1994)
‘Rational Choice and Social Theory’
, Journal of Philosophy94:
71-87
.
21.
Schotter, Andrew
(1981) The Economic Theory of Social Institutions.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
22.
Ullmann-Margalit, Edna
(1977) The Emergence of Norms.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
23.
Van Damme, Eric
(1989)
‘Stable Equilibria and Forward Induction’
, Journal of Economic Theory48:
476-496
.
24.
Vanberg, Victor
(1994) Rules and Choice in Economics.
London: Routledge
.
