How do democratic institutions influence international trade policy? This article
highlights conceptual challenges confronting the study of democracy and trade. Using
a game theoretic model, I aim to spell out the precise effect of democratic
legislative constraints on trade. In contrast to the dyadic argument that
legislative constraints enable democracies to better cooperate with each other to
liberalize trade, I argue that effective legislative constraints give a democracy a
monadic bargaining advantage in international trade negotiations. This advantage is
associated with a lower level of trade barriers abroad and a higher level of trade
barriers at home. Thus, rather than dyadically cooperative, a democracy may be
monadically competitive.
Bennett, Scott D.
and
Allan III Stam
(1998)
‘The Declining Advantages of Democracy: A Combined Model of War
Outcomes and Duration’
, Journal of Conflict Resolution42(3):
344–366
.
2.
Bliss, Harry
and
Bruce Russett
(1998)
‘Democratic Trading Partners: The Liberal Connection, 1962–1989’
, Journal of Politics60:
1126–1147
.
3.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce
,
James D. Morrow
,
Randolph M. Siverson
and
Alastair Smith
(1999)
‘An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace’
, American Political Science Review93:
791–807
.
4.
Busch, Marc L.
(2000)
‘Democracy, Consultation and the Paneling of Disputes under GATT’
, Journal of Conflict Resolution44(4):
425–446
.
5.
Dai, Xinyuan
(2002)
‘Political Regimes and International Trade: The Democratic
Difference Revisited’
, American Political Science Review96(March):
159–165
.
6.
Dixon, William J.
and
Bruce Moon
(1993)
‘Political Similarity and American Foreign Trade Patterns’
, Political Research Quarterly46:
5–25
.
7.
Evans, Peter B.
,
Harold K. Jacobson
and
Robert D. Putnam
(eds) (1993) Double-edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining
and Domestic Politics.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
8.
Fearon, James D.
(1994)
‘Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes’
, American Political Science Review88(3):
577–592
.
9.
Fearon, James D.
(1998)
‘Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation’
, International Organization52(Spring):
269–305
.
10.
Gowa, Joanne
(1999) Ballots and Bullets: The Elusive Democratic
Peace.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
11.
Gowa, Joanne
and
Edward D. Mansfield
(1993)
‘Power Politics and International Trade’
, American Political Science Review87(3):
408–420
.
12.
Green, Donald P.
,
Soo Yeon Kim
and
David H. Yoon
(2001)
‘Dirty Pool’
, International Organization55(2):
441–468
.
13.
Gruber, Lloyd
(2000) Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of
Supranational Institutions.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
14.
Hug, Simon
and
Thomas König
(2002)
‘In View of Ratification: Governmental Preferences and Domestic
Constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference’
, International Organization56(2):
447–476
.
15.
Humphreys, Macartan
(2003) ‘Bargaining in the Presence of a Strategic
Ratifier’,
Mimeo, Columbia University
.
16.
Iida, Keisuke
(1993)
‘When and How Do Domestic Constraints Matter? Two-level Games
with Uncertainty’
, Journal of Conflict Resolution37:
403–426
.
17.
Iida, Keisuke
(1996)
‘Involuntary Defection in Two-level Games’
, Public Choice89:
283–303
.
18.
Ikenberry, G. John
(2001) After Victories: Institutions, Strategic Restraints,
and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
19.
König, Thomas
and
Jonathan Slapin
(2004)
‘Bringing Parliaments Back In: The Sources of Power in the
European Treaty Negotiations’
, Journal of Theoretical Politics16(3):
357–394
.
20.
Krasner, Stephen
(1991)
‘Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier’
, World Politics43:
336–366
.
21.
Lohmann, Susanne
(1993)
‘Electoral Cycles and International Policy Coordination’
, European Economic Review37:
1373–1391
.
22.
Lohmann, Susanne
and
Sharyn O'Halloran
(1994)
‘Divide Government and U.S. Trade Policy’
, International Organization48:
495–632
.
23.
Mansfield, Edward D.
and
Rachel Bronson
(1997) ‘The Political Economy of Major-power
Trade Flows’, in
Edward D. Mansfield
and
Helen V. Milner
(eds). The Political Economy of Regionalism, pp.
188–208.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
24.
Mansfield, Edward D.
,
Helen V. Milner
and
B. Peter Rosendorff
(2000)
‘Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade’
, American Political Science Review94(June):
305–321
.
25.
Mansfield, Edward D.
,
Helen V. Milner
and
B. Peter Rosendorff
(2002)
‘Replication, Realism, and Robustness: Analyzing Political
Regimes and International Trade’
, American Political Science Review96(March):
167–169
.
26.
Martin, Lisa L.
(2000) ‘Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and
International Cooperation.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
27.
Mayer, Frederick W.
(1992)
‘Managing Domestic Differences in International Negotiations: The
Strategic Use of Internal Side-payments’
, International Organization46:
793–818
.
28.
Mertha, Andrew
and
Robert Pahre
(2005)
‘Patently Misleading: Partial Implementation and Bargaining
Leverage in Sino-American Negotiations on Intellectual Property Rights’
, International Organization59(3)
295–730
.
29.
Milner, Helen V.
and
B. Peter Rosendorff
(1996)
‘Trade Negotiations, Information and Domestic Politics: The Role
of Domestic Groups’
, Economics and Politics8(July):
145–189
.
30.
Milner, Helen V.
and
B. Peter Rosendorff
(1997)
‘Domestic Politics and International Trade Negotiations’
, Journal of Conflict Resolution41(1):
117–146
.
31.
Mo, Jongryn
(1994)
‘The Logic of Two-level Games with Endogenours Domestic Coalitions’
, Journal of Conflict Resolution38:
402–422
.
32.
Mo, Jongryn
(1995)
‘Domestic Institutions and International Bargaining: The Role of
Agent Veto in Two-level Games’
, American Political Science Review89(December):
914–924
.
33.
Morrow, James D.
(1991)
‘Electoral and Congressional Incentives and Arms Control’
, Journal of Conflict Resolution35:
245–265
.
34.
Morrow, James D.
(1994)
‘Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution
versus Information’
, International Organization48(3):
387–423
.
35.
Morrow, James D.
,
Randolph M. Siverson
and
Tressa E. Tabares
(1998)
‘The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major
Powers, 1907–1990’
, American Political Science Review92(3):
649–661
.
36.
Oneal, John R.
and
Bruce Russett
(2001)
‘Clear and Clean: The Fixed Effects of the Liberal Peace’
, International Organization55(2):
469–485
.
37.
Pahre, Robert
(1997)
‘Endogenous Domestic Institutions in Two-level Games and
Parliamentary Oversight of the European Union’
, Journal of Conflict Resolution41(February):
147–174
.
38.
Putnam, Robert D.
(1988)
‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games’
, International Organization42:
427–460
.
39.
Reinhardt, Eric
(2000) ‘Aggressive Multilateralism: The
Determinants of GATT/WTO Dispute Initiation,
1948–1998’,
Mimeo, Emory University
.
40.
Reiter, Dan
and
Allan C. Stam
(2002) Democracies at War.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
41.
Rogowski, Ronald
(1987)
‘Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions’
, International Organization41(Spring):
203–224
.
42.
Russett, Bruce
(1993) Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a
Post-Cold War World.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
43.
Schelling, Thomas C.
(1960) The Strategy of Conflict.
Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
.
44.
Schneider, Gerald
and
Stefanie Bailer
(forthcoming) ‘Nash or Schelling: Legislative Bargaining
with and without Domestic Constraints’, in
Robert Thomson
,
Frans Stokman
,
Christopher Achen
and
Thomas König
(eds) The European Union Decides.
New York: Cambridge University Press
.
45.
Schneider, Gerald
and
Lars-Erik Cederman
(1994)
‘The Change of Tide in Political Cooperation: A Limited
Information Model of European Integration’
, International Organization48(4):
633–662
.
46.
Schneider, Gerald
and
Patricia A. Weitsman
(1996)
‘The Punishment Trap: Integration Referendums as Popularity Contests’
, Comparative Political Studies28(4):
582–607
.
47.
Schultz, Kenneth A.
(1998)
‘Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises’
, American Political Science Review92(December):
829–844
.
48.
Schultz, Kenneth A.
(2001) Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
49.
Simmons, Beth A.
(1994) Who Adjusts: Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic
Policy During the Interwar Years.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
50.
Simmons, Beth A.
(2000)
‘International Law and State Behavior: Commitment and Compliance
in International Monetary Affairs’
, American Political Science Review94(4):
819–835
.
51.
Siverson, Randolph
(ed.) (1998) Strategic Politicians, Institutions, and Foreign
Policy.
Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
.
52.
Smith, Alastair
(1998)
‘International Crises and Domestic Politics’
, American Political Science Review92:
623–638
.
53.
Tarar, Ahmer
(2001)
‘International Bargaining with Two-sided Domestic Constraints’
, Journal of Conflict Resolution45(3):
320–340
.
54.
Verdier, Daniel
(1994) Democracy and International Trade: Britain, France,
and the United States, 1860–1990.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
55.
Verdier, Daniel
(1998)
‘Democratic Convergence and Free Trade’
, International Studies Quarterly42(1):
1–24
.
