The evaluation of formal models generates questions about the unit of analysis, the
nature of the policy space and the kind of criteria to be applied for comparative
testing. Do we study decision-making at the proposal level or do we explore the
policy space of a set of proposals across multiple sectors? Can we reduce the policy
space of the unit of analysis and if so, how do we reduce it? And how do we test
formal theories - should we use point predictions offering multiple criteria or do
we have proceedings which control for robustness and the level of assumptions?
Achen, C.
(2006) ‘Evaluating Political Decision Making
Models’, in
R. Thompson
,
F. Stokman
,
C. Achen
and
T. KöNig
(eds) The European Union Decides.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
2.
Borg, I.
and
J. Lingoes
(1987) Multidimensional Scaling.
Heidelberg: Springer
.
3.
KöNig, T.
(1997) Europa auf dem Weg zum Mehrheitssystem.
Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher
.
4.
KöNig, T.
and
M. Pöter
(2001)
‘Examining the EU Legislative Process: The Relative Importance of
Agenda and Veto Power’
, European Union Politics2:
329-351
.
5.
Morton, R.
(1999) Methods and Models.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
6.
Pool, K.
(1998) ‘Non-parametric Unfolding of Binary Choice
Data’, manuscript,
Carnegie Mellon University
.
7.
Selck, T.
(2004)
‘On the Dimensionality of European Legislative Decision Making’
, Journal of Theoretical Politics16:
203-222
.
8.
Shepsle, K.
(1989)
‘Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach’
, Journal of Theoretical Politics1:
131-147
.
9.
Shepsle, K.
and
B. Weingast
(1981)
‘Structure-induced Equilibrium and Legislative Choice’
, Public Choice37:
503-519
.
10.
Thompson, R.
,
F. Stokman
,
C. Achen
and
T. KöNig
(2006) The European Union Decides.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
11.
Tollison R.
and
T. Willet
(1979)
‘An Economic Theory for Mutual Advantageous Issue Linkage in
International Negotiations’
, International Organization33:
425-449
.
12.
Treier, S.
and
S. Jackman
(2002)
‘Beyond Factor Analysis. Modern Tools for Social Measurement’
, paper presented at the Midwest Political Science
Conference, Chicago.
13.
Tsebelis, G.
(2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
