AppelbaumP. S.Must we forgo informed consent to control health care costs? A response to Mark A. Hall. The Milbank Quarterly, 1993; 71 (4): 669–76.
3.
ArcangeloV.Should age be a criterion for rationing health care?Nursing Forum–-New Jersey, 1994; 29 (1): 25–9.
4.
BakerR.Visibility and the just allocation of health care: A study of age-rationing in the British National Health Service. Health Care Analysis, 1993; 1 (2): 139–50.
5.
BranniganM.Oregon's Experiment. Health Care Analysis, 1993; 1 (1): 15–32.
6.
BrindleD.NHS treatments ruled out by cost. The Guardian, 27 September 1995.
7.
BrooksR.Health Status Measurement.London: Macmillan, 1995.
8.
BullA. R.Problems of prioritisation and our duty to care. Journal of Management in Medicine, 1991; 5 (4): 35–9.
9.
CallahanD.Setting Limits: Medical Goals in an Aging Society. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987.
10.
CallahanD.Ethics and priority setting in Oregon. Health Affairs, 1991; 10 (2): 78–87.
11.
CallahanD.Should health care for the elderly be rationed?Coronary Artery Disease, 1993; 4 (3): 39–4.
12.
Carr-HillR. A.Assumptions of the QALY procedure. Social Science and Medicine, 1989; 29 (3): 469–77.
13.
ChurchillI. R.Rationing Health Care in America.Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1987.
DanielsN.Is the Oregon Rationing Plan fair?Journal of the American Medical Association, 1991; 265 (17): 2232–5.
16.
DoyalL.The role of the public in health care rationing. Critical Public Health, 1994; 4 (1): 49–54.
17.
DoyalL.How not to ration health care: The moral perils of utilitarian decision making: in Honigs-BaumF.RichardsJ.LockettT.Priority Setting in Action, Oxford: Radcliffe, 1995:80–90.
18.
DuceR.Court to decide on leukaemia girl's chance to live. The Times, 10 March 1995.
19.
FleckL. M.Just health-care rationing–-a democratic decision-making approach. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1992; 140 (5): 1597–636.
20.
FleckL. M.Just caring: Health reform and health care rationing. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1994a; 19 (5): 435–43.
21.
FleckL. M.Just caring: Oregon, health care rationing, and informed democratic deliberation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1994b; 19 (4): 367–38.
22.
FoxD. M.LeichterH. M.Rationing care in Oregon–-the new accountability. Health Affairs, 1991; 10 (2): 7–27.
23.
GerardK.MooneyG.QALY league tables: Handle with care. Health Economics, 1993; 2 (1): 59–64.
24.
EvansGrimley J.Aging and rationing: Physiology not age should determine care. British Medical Journal, 1991; 303: 869–70.
25.
HadornD. C.Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1991; 265 (17): 2218–25.
26.
HadornD. C.The problem of discrimination in health care priority setting. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1992; 268 (11): 1454–8.
27.
HallJ.HaasM.The rationing of health-care–-should Oregon be transported to Australia?Australian Journal of Public Health, 1992; 16 (4): 435–40.
28.
HallM. A.Disclosing rationing decisions: A reply to Paul S Appelbaum. The Milbank Quarterly, 1994; 72 (2): 211–15.
HarrisJ.QALYfying the value of life. Journal of Medical Ethics, 1987; 13 (3): 117–23.
31.
HarrisJ.EQALYTY: in ByrneP. ed. Health, Rights and Resources: King's College Studies 1987–8.London: King Edward's Hospital Fund for London, 1988:100–27.
32.
HarrisonSHunterD. J.Rationing Health-Care.London: Institute for Public Policy Research, 1994.
33.
Healthcare 2000 UK Health and Healthcare Services: London: Healthcare2000, 1995.
34.
HeginbothamC.Healthcare priority setting: A survey of doctors, managers, and the general public: in Rationing in Action.London: BMJ Publishing, 1993:141–56.
35.
HonigsbaumF.Who shall live? Who shall die?–-Oregon's health financing proposals. King's Fund College Papers, London: King's Fund College, 1991.
36.
HunterD. J.Rationing Dilemmas in Health Care. Research Paper No. 8. London: NAHAT, 1993(a).
37.
HunterD. J.Rationing and health gain. Critical Public Health, 1993b; 4: 27–33.
38.
JeckerN. S.Age-based rationing and women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1991; 266 (21): 3012–15.
39.
JeckerN. S.PearlmanR. A.Ethical constraints on rationing medical-care by age. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1989; 37 (11): 1067–75.
40.
KaplanR. M.A quality-of-life approach to health resource allocation. In: StrosbergM. A., eds. Rationing America's Medical Care: The Oregon Plan and Beyond.Oregon: The Bookings Institution, 1992; 60–77.
41.
KitzhaberJ. A.Rationing in action: Prioritising health services in an era of limits: The Oregon experience. British Medical Journal, 1993; 307 (6900): 373–7.
42.
LockwoodM.Quality of life and resource allocation. In: BellJ. M.MedusS. eds, Philosophy and Medical Welfare.1988.
43.
MenzelP. T.Strong Medicine.New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
44.
MenzelP. T.Oregon's denial: Disabilities and quality of life. Hastings Center Report, 1992; 22 (6): 21–5.
45.
MooneyG.QALYs: Are they enough? A health economist's perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics, 1989; 15: 148–52.
46.
MooneyG.GerardK.DonaldsonC.FarrarS.Priority Setting in Purchasing. Research Paper 6.NAHAT, 1992.
47.
MullenP. M.Is it necessary to ration health care?Public Money and Management, 1998, 18 (1): 52–8.
48.
MullenP. M.Priority setting in health care: Techniques and pitfalls. In: KasteleinA.VissersJ.van MerodeG.G.DelesieL. eds Managing Health Care Under Resource Constraints.Eindhoven: EURO: 105–33.
49.
MullenP. M.SpurgeonP.Involving the Public in Setting Priorities for Health Care Techniques and Approaches.Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, 1996.
50.
MullinJ.Father sees hope for leukaemia girl vanish in volte-face. The Guardian, 11 March 1995.
51.
NelsonR. M.DroughtT.Justice and the moral acceptability of rationing medical-care–-The Oregon experiment. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1992; 17 (1): 97–117.
52.
NordE.A comment on the meaning of numerical valuations of health states. Social Science and Medicine, 1990; 30 (8): 943–4.
53.
NordE.Unjustified use of the quality of well-being scale in priority setting in Oregon. Health Policy, 1993; 24 (8): 45–53.
54.
Observer, Twinned questions of life and death [Editorial]. The Observer, 17 September 1995.
55.
RyanM.TwaddleS.Economic issues in the evaluation of in-vitro fertilisation. In: UK Health Economics Study Group Meeting, Aberdeen, 1991.
56.
StrosbergM. A.WienerJ. M.BakerR.FeinI. A. eds. Rationing America's medical care: the Oregon plan and beyond. Washington, DC: The Bookings Institution, 1992.
57.
TurleyJ.The inhuman rationing of health care [Letter]. The Guardian, 14 March 1995.
58.
VictorP.PenmanDCastleS.Anonymous donor pays for Girl B's treatment. Independent on Sunday, 12 March.
59.
WardD.Smoker dies after operation was denied until he gave up. The Guardian, 17 August 1993.
60.
WealeS.Dying girl refused NHS treatment. The Guardian, 10 March 1995.
61.
WelchH. G.LarsonE. B.Dealing with limited resources: The oregon decision to curtail funding for organ transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine, 1988; 319: 171–3.
62.
WilliamsA.Economics, QALYs and medical ethics–-a health economist's perspective. Health Care Analysis, 1995; 3 (3): 221–6.