The corporatization of health care organizations has become a significant international trend. This paper examines that trend, comparing the development of corporate health care in the USA with the impact of the New Zealand health reforms. The paper traces the evolution of the organizations of health care systems and explains the emergence of the corporate form. We argue that the corporate model of work organization is unsuited to the complex and ambiguous nature of the medical task as it ignores inherent interdependencies. An alternative is needed which addresses work practices rather than just participation in decision making and is based on a concept of mutual interdependence and support in the execution of work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoyackJ. (1988). ‘Devolution: The health experience.’ In: Devolution and Accountability, MartinJ.HarperJ. (eds), New Zealand Institute of Public Administration34: 140–144.
2.
Canterbury Area Health Board Steering Committee (1988). Report to the Canterbury Hospital Board and Ashburton Hospital Board, Christchurch.
3.
CaygillD. (1988). Health: A Prescription for Change.Wellington: Government Print.
4.
CoburnD. (1988). Canadian medicine: Dominance or ‘proletarianization?’Milbank Quarterly, 66 (2): 92–116.
5.
CoombesR. (1987). ‘Accounting for the control of doctors: Management information systems in hospitals.’Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12 (4): 389–404.
6.
CrozierM. (1964). The Bureaucratic Phenomenon.London: Tavistock.
7.
DiskenS.DixonM.HalpernS.ShocketG. (1990). Models of Clinical Management.London: Institute of Health Services Management.
8.
EmmonsD. (1987). Changing Dimensions of Medical Practice Arrangements.American Medical AssociationChicago: Office of Socioeconomic Research.
9.
FeinglassJ.SalmonJ. (1990). ‘Corporatization of Medicine: The use of medical management information systems to increase the clinical productivity of physicians.’International Journal of Health Services, 20 (2): 233–252.
10.
FreidsonE. (1984). ‘The changing nature of professional control.’Annals Review of Sociology, 10: 1–20.
11.
FriedB.DeberR.LeattP. (1987). ‘Corporatization and deprivation of health services in Canada.’International Journal of Health Services, 17 (4): 567–584.
HarrisJ. (1977). ‘The internal organization of hospitals: Some economic implications.’Bell Journal of Economics, 8: 467–482.
17.
HaugM. (1973). ‘Deprofessionalization: An alternative hypothesis for the future.’Sociological Review Monograph, 20: 195–221.
18.
HaugM. (1988). ‘A re-examination of the hypothesis of physician deprofessionalization.’Milbank Quarterly, 66 (2): 83–106.
19.
HeidenheimerA. (1980). ‘Conflict and compromises between professional and bureaucratic health interests 1947–72.’ In: The shaping of the Swedish Health System, HeidenheimerA.ElvanderN. (eds), pp. 119–142. London: Croom Helm.
20.
HoodC. (1991). ‘A public management for all seasons.’Public Administration, 69: 3–19.
21.
McKinlayJ.ArchesJ. (1985). ‘Towards the proletarianization of physicians.’International Journal of Health Services, 5 (2): 161–195.
22.
McKinlayJ.StockleJ. (1987). ‘Corporatization and the social transformation of doctoring.’Finnish Journal of Social Medicine, 24: 73–84.
23.
MechanicD. (1976). The Growth of Bureaucratic Medicine.New York: John Wiley.
24.
MechanicD. (1989). Painful Choices: Research Essays on Health Care.New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
25.
MertonR. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure.New York: Free Press.
26.
MintzbergH. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27.
New Zealand Department of Health (1974). A Health Service for New Zealand (White Paper). Wellington: Government Print.
28.
PfefferJ. (1982). Organizations and Organization Theory.Boston: Pitman.
29.
PollittC. (1982). ‘Corporate rationalization of American health care: A visitor's appraisal.’Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 7 (1): 227–253.
30.
PollittC.HarrisonS.HunterD.MarnochG. (1988). ‘The reluctant managers: Clinicians and budgets in the NHS.’Financial Accountability and Management, 4 (3): 213–233.
31.
RiskaE. (1988). ‘The professional status of physicians in the Nordic countries.’Milbank Quarterly, 66 (2): 133–147.
32.
ScottG.BushnellP.SalleeN. (1990). ‘Reform of the core public sector: The New Zealand experience.’Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 3 (3): 138–167, 2 April.
33.
ScottG.GorringeP. (1989). ‘Reform of the core public sector: The New Zealand experience.’Australian Journal of Public Administration, 48 (1): 81–92.
34.
ScottW. (1982). ‘Managing professional work: Three models of control for health organizations.’Health Services Research, 17 (3): 213–240.
35.
ScottW. (1983). ‘Health care organizations in the 1980s: The convergence of public and professional control systems.’ In: Organizational Environments: Ritual and rationality, MeyerJ.ScottW. (eds) Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage, pp. 99–113.
36.
StockleJ.ReiserS. (1992). ‘The corporate organization of hospital work: Balancing professional and administrative work.’Annals of Internal Medicine, 16 (5): 407–413.
37.
TerryC. (1988). Management of the New Zealand Health System.Institute of Policy Studies, Seminar Health policy: directions for reformWellington, 29–30 March.
38.
ThompsonJ. (1967). Organizations in Action.New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
ThorngrenT.TintsmanT. (1990). ‘Challenging new roles for medical and professional staff: Managing costs and quality of care.’Topics in Health Care Financing, 16 (3): 1–11.
