The term ‘Health Services Research’ (HSR) has achieved only recent currency in the UK. The purpose of this short article is to explain what it is, to say how it differs from clinical research even when using similar methods, and to argue that it is likely to become of rapidly increasing importance to health policy-makers and managers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AntmanE.LauJ.KupelnickB.MostellerF.ChalmersT. (1992). ‘A comparison of results of meta-analysis of randomised control trials and recommendations of clinical experts’. Journal of the American Medical Association, 268:240–8.
2.
ClarkeM.KurinczukJ. J. (1992). ‘Health Services Research: A case of need or special pleading?’. British Medical Journal, 304:1675–6.
3.
CochraneA. (1972). ‘Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections on Health Services’. Rick Carling Lecture: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.
4.
Editorial (1992). The Lancet, VI (339): 1197–8.
5.
EisenbergL. (1988). ‘The relationship between psychiatric research and public policy’. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153:21–9.
6.
FergusonJ.GoldacreM.HendersonJ.GillmerM. (1991). ‘Audit of workload in gynaecology: Analysis of time trends from linked statistics’. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 98:772–7.
7.
FowkesF. G. R.GarrowayW. M.SheehyC. K. (1991). ‘Quality of Health Services Research in Medical Practice in the UK’. Journal of Epidemiology, and Community Health, 45: 102–6.
8.
FrobergD.KaneR. (1989a). ‘Methodology for measuring health-state preferences — I: Measurement strategies’. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42(4): 345–54.
9.
FrobergD.KaneR. (1989b). ‘Methodology for measuring health-state preferences — II: Scaling methods’. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42(5): 459–71.
10.
FrobergD.KaneR. (1989c). ‘Methodology for measuring health-state preferences — III: Population and contact effects’. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42(6): 585–92.
11.
FrobergD.KaneR. (1989d). ‘Methodology for measuring health-state preferences — IV: Progress and a research agenda’. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42(7): 675–85.
12.
GoldacreM. J.LeeA.DonB. (1987). ‘Waiting list statistics I: Relation between admissions from waiting list and length of waiting list’. British Medical Journal, 295:1105–8.
13.
HendersonJ.GoldacreM. J.GraveneyM. J.SimmonsH. M. (1989). ‘Use of medical record linkage to study readmission rates’. British Medical Journal, 299:709–13.
14.
LomasJ. (1988). ‘Holding back the tide of Caesarians: Publishing recommendations is not enough to stop the rise’. British Medical Journal, 297:569–70.
15.
McGuireA.HendersonJ.MooneyG. (1988). The Economics of Health Care., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
16.
MoserC. A.KaltonG. (1971). Survey Methods in Social Investigation., London: Heinemann (p 318).
17.
MRC (1991). Notes for applicants to the Health Services Research Committee.
18.
PopeC.MaysN. (1992). ‘Opening the black box: An encounter in the corridors of health services research’. British Medical Journal, 306:315–8.
19.
PressmanJ. L.WildawskyA. (1973). Implementation., Berkeley Ca: University of California Press.
20.
RoethlisbergerF. J.DicksonW. J. (1939). Management and the Worker., Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
21.
RussellI.GrimshawJ.(1992). ‘The effectiveness of referral guidelines: A review of the methods and findings of published evaluations in Hospital Referrals’. In RollandM.CoulterA.(eds.) Oxford, Toronto, New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
SpenceM. W. (1990). ‘Discovery, recruitment and public relations — some thoughts on the role and the future of clinical investigation in Canada’. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 13(2): 92–7.
23.
ThorntonJ.LilfordR.JohnsonN. (1992). ‘Decision analysis in medicine’. British Medical Journal, 304:1099–103.
24.
TuffnellD. J.LilfordR. J.BuchanP. C.PrendivilleV. M.TuffnellA. J.HolgateM. P.JonesM. D. Griffith (1993). ‘Randomised Controlled trial of day care for hypertension in pregnancy’. Lancet, 339: 224–6.
25.
WelchB. L.HayJ. W.MillerD. S.OlsenR. J.RippeyR. M.WelchA. S. (1987). ‘The Rand Health Insurance Study: A summary antique’. Medical Care., 25:148–56.
