This paper explores attitudes of university students towards two differently organised health services, ie the National Health Service in the UK and the more market oriented system in the US and analyses the level of confidence placed in primary care providers (GPs/family physicians) in both systems. Although major differences in the perception of the two health care systems are identified, hardly any differences emerge between the two countries in terms of the confidence patients place in their primary care providers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcitoF.JainA. K. (1980). ‘Evaluation of conjoint analysis results: A comparison of methods’. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(February), 106–112.
2.
Association of Consumer Research (1989). General Practice Satisfaction Survey Report, Mass Observation Limited.
3.
BeckerM. H.MaimanL. A. (1975). ‘Sociobehavioral determinants of compliance with health and medical care recommendations’. Medical Care, 13(1): 10–24.
4.
BrownS. W.SwartzT. A. (1989). ‘A gap analysis of professional service quality’Journal of Marketing, 53(April): 92–98.
5.
CarmanJ. M. (1990), ‘Consumer perceptions of service quality: An assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions’. Journal of Retailing, 66(spring): 33–55.
6.
Department of Health and Social Security (1987). General Medical Practitioners’ Workload, London: DHSS.
7.
DonabedianA. (1988). ‘The quality of care. How can it be assessed?’Journal of the American Medical Association, 260(12): 1743–1748.
8.
FriedsonF. (1989). Medical Work in America: Essays on Health Care..
9.
FryJ. (1988). ‘NHS General Practice 1948–1988', The Royal College of General Practitioners 1988 Members’ Reference Book, London: Sabrecrown Publishing, 308–312.
10.
GonzalezM.EmmonsD. (1987). Socioeconomic Characteristics of Medical Practice, Chicago: American Medical Association.
11.
GreenP. E.TullD. S.AlbaumG. (1988). Research for Marketing Decisions, 5th ed., London: Prentice-Hall International.
12.
HallJ. A.DornanM. C. (1988). ‘Metat analysis of satisfaction with medical care.’Social Science and Medicine, 27(6): 637–644.
13.
Health Department of Great Britain (1989). General Practice in the National Health Service: The 1990 Contract — GPs’ Terms of Service and Remuneration System, London, August.
14.
JowellR.AireyC. (1987). British Social Attitudes: The 1987 Report, Aldershot: Gower Publishing.
15.
Kaim-CaudleP. R.MarshG. N. (1975). ‘Patient-satisfaction survey in general practice’. British Medical Journal, (February 1): 262–264.
16.
KeebleB.KeebleA. (1989), ‘Satisfaction with the National Health Service: What is it and can we measure it?’. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 39: 269–272.
17.
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1980). Classification of Occupations, London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
18.
RoghmannK. J.HengstA.ZastownyM. A. (1979). ‘Satisfaction with medical care. Its measurement and relation to utilisation’. Medical Care, 17(5): 461–477.
19.
SchlegelmilchB. B.CarmanJ.MooreS. A. (1992). ‘Choice and perceived quality of family practitioners in the United States and the United Kingdom’. The Service Industries Journal, 12(2) 263–284.
20.
Scottish Home and Health Department (1989). General Practice in the National Health Service: A New Contract, Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
21.
Secretaries of State for Health, England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland (1989). Working for Patients, London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office.
22.
The Market Research Society (1990). Occupation Groupings: A Job Directory, Derby: Saxon Printing Ltd.
23.
WilliamsonV. (1989). ‘Patients’ satisfaction with general practitioner services: A survey by a community health council’. The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 39(November): 452–455.
