An empirical assessment of the use of the Hackman, Oldham, Janson, and Purdy (1975) implementing principles as a theoretical link between hospital nursing unit technology and job design is presented in this paper. While support for the implementing principles as an integrating mechanism was found to be weak, some insights into organization theory are noted and suggestions for future research resulting from this study are outlined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderJ. W.RandolphW. A. (1985). ‘The fit between technology and structure as a predictor of performance in nursing subunits.’ Academy of Management Journal, 28, 844–859.
2.
ArgoteL. (1982). ‘Input uncertainty and organizational co-ordination in hospital emergency units.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 420–434.
3.
BillingsR. S.KlimoskiR. J.BreaughJ. A. (1977). ‘The impact of a change in technology on job characteristics: A quasi-experiment.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 318–339.
4.
BlaunerR. (1964). Alienation and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
ComstockD. E.ScottW. R. (1977). ‘Technology and the structure of subunits: Distinguishing individual and workgroup effects.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 177–202.
6.
CooperR.FosterM. (1971). ‘Sodotechnical systems.’ American Psychologist, 26, 467–474.
7.
DunhamR. B. (1976). ‘The measurement and dimensionality of job characteristics.’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 404–409.
8.
HackmanJ. R.LawlerE. E.III. (1971). ‘Employee reactions to job characteristics.’ Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 55, 259–286.
9.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1975). ‘Development of the job diagnostic survey.’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170.
10.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG.JansonR.PurdyK. A. (1975). ‘New Strategy for job enrichment.’ California Management Review, 17, 57–71
12.
HageJ.AikenM. (1969). ‘Routine technology, social structure, and organizational goals.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 366–377.
13.
HallR. H. (1962). ‘Intraorganizational structural variation: Application of the bureaucratic model.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 7, 295–308.
14.
HicksonD. J.PughD. S.PheyseyD. C. (1969). ‘Operations technology and organization structure: An empirical reappraisal.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 378–397.
15.
LawrenceP. R.LorschJ. W. (1967). Organization and environment. Boston: Harvard University.
MannF. C.HoffmanL. R. (1960). Automation and the worker. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
18.
OvertonP.SchneckR.HazlettC. B. (1977). ‘An empirical study of the technology of nursing subunits.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 203–219.
19.
PerrowC. A. (1967). ‘Framework for the comparative analysis of organizations.’ American Sociological Review, 32, 194–208.
20.
PorterL. W.LawlerE. E.IIIHackmanJ. R. (1975). Behavior in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
RandolphW. A.FinchF. E. (1977). ‘The relationship between organization technology and the direction and frequency dimensions of task communitcations.’ Human Relations, 30, 1131–1145.
22.
RiceA. K. (1958). Productivity and social organization: The Ahmedabad Experiment. London: Tavistock.
23.
RousseauD. M. (1977). ‘Technological differences in job characteristics, employee satisfaction, and motivation: A synthesis of job design research and sociotechnical systems.’ Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19, 18–42.
24.
RousseauD. M. (1978). ‘Measures of technology as predictors of attitude.’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 213–218.
25.
RousseauD. M. (1978). ‘Characteristics of departments, positions, and individuals: Contexts for attitudes and behavior.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 521–540.
26.
RousseauD. M. (1979). ‘Assessment of technology in organizations: Closed versus open systems approaches’. Academy of Management Review, 4, 531–542.
27.
SchulerR. S. (1977). ‘Role conflict and ambiguity as a function of the task-structure-technology interaction.’ Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 60–74.
28.
ScottW. R.DornbuschS. M.EvashwickC. J.MagnaniL.SagatunI. (1972). Task conceptions and work arrangements. Memorandum #97. Palo Alto, CA.: Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching.
29.
ShortellS. M. (1977). ‘The role of environment in a configurational theory of organizations.’ Human Relations, 30, 275–302.
30.
SlocumJ. W.Jr.SimsH. P.Jr. (1980). ‘A typology for integrating technology, organization, and job design.’ Human Relations, 33, 193–212.
31.
StanfieldG. (1976). ‘Technology and organization structure as theoretical categories.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 489–493.
32.
StoneE. F.PorterL. W. (1975). ‘Job characteristics and job attitudes: A multivariate study.’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 57–64.
33.
SusmanG. I. (1970). ‘The impact of automation on work group autonomy and task specialization.’ Human Relations, 23, 567–577.
34.
SzilagyiA. D.Jr.WallaceM. M.Jr. (1980). Organizational behavior and performance, (2nd ed.). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
35.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
TristE. L.BamfordK. W. (1951). ‘Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall methods of coal getting.’ Human Relations, 4, 3–38.
37.
TurnerA. N.LawrenceP. R. (1965). Industrial jobs and the worker. Boston: Harvard University Press.
38.
UdyS. H. (1965). ‘The comparative analysis of organizations.’ In MarchJ. G. (ed.), Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
39.
Van de VenA. H.DelbecqA. L.KoenigR. (1976). ‘Determinants of co-ordination modes within organizations.’ American Sociological Review, 41, 322–338.
40.
WoodwardJ. (1965). Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice. London: Oxford University Press.
