Hybrid managers have the potential to respond to the need for more integrated, responsive and accountable healthcare. Scholars have studied the antecedents of hybridization, but the role of gender has been neglected. Therefore, we study whether and how gender impacts on the way in which medical professionals exercise their managerial role.
Methods
We adopted a qualitative approach in order to gain an in-depth understanding of the specificities of women hybrids. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews, focusing on hybrids in Italy in the field of neurology.
Results
We found that women hybrids show specific abilities and motivations, but they also encounter a specific lack of opportunities. Women hybrid managers appear well positioned to foster the evolution of professionalism, but healthcare organizations should implement policies and practices to effectively support them.
Conclusion
While existing research has treated hybrid managers as a homogenous group, we underline the specificities of women hybrids. They can support the evolution of healthcare organizations towards logics of service integration, user centricity, and staff engagement. Therefore, our findings have important theoretical and practical implications for health policy and management.
KirkpatrickIKuhlmannEHartleyK, et al.Medicine and management in European hospitals: a comparative overview. BMC Health Serv Res2016; 16(Suppl 2): 171.
2.
SartiranaMGiacomelliG. Hybridity enabled: a research synthesis of the enabling conditions for hybrid professionalism in healthcare. Health Serv Manag Res2023; 37: 2–15.
3.
GilmartinMJD’AunnoTA. Leadership research in healthcare. Academy Manage Annals2007; 1(1): 387–438.
4.
DenisJLFerlieEVanGestelN. Understanding hybridity in public organizations. Publ Adm2015; 93(2): 273–289.
5.
NumeratoDSalvatoreDFattoreG. The impact of management on medical professionalism: a review. Sociol Health Illness2011; 34(4): 626–644.
6.
CurrieGBurgessNHaytonJC. HR practices and knowledge brokering by hybrid middle managers in hospital settings: the influence of professional hierarchy. Hum Resour Manag2015; 54: 793–812.
7.
BoxallPPurcellJ. Strategy and human resource management. 3rd ed.Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
8.
LegaFSartiranaM. Making doctors manage… but how? recent developments in the Italian NHS. BMC Health Serv Res2016; 16 Suppl 2(2): 170.
9.
SartoFVeronesiGKirkpatrickI. Organizing professionals and their impact on performance: the case of public health doctors in the Italian SSN. Publ Manag Rev2019; 21(7): 1029–1051.
10.
NoordegraafM. Hybrid professionalism and beyond. (New) forms of public professionalism in changing organizational and societal contexts. J Prof Organization2015; 2(2): 187–206.
11.
MuzioDBoltonS. Feminisation and paradox: stratification and segmentation in professional contexts. Ir J Manag2006; 1: 79–93.
12.
IreriSWalsheKBensonL, et al.A qualitative and quantitative study of medical leadership and management: experiences, competencies, and development needs of doctor managers in the United Kingdom. J Manag Market Healthc2011; 4(1): 16–29.
13.
LiberatoreFSchätzleJRäwerH, et al.The impact of preferences for clinical and managerial leadership roles on the willingness to apply for a medical leadership position: analysis of gender differences among a sample of German senior physicians. Health Serv Manag Res2022; 35(1): 27–36.
14.
RothVRTheriaultAClementC, et al.Women physicians as healthcare leaders: a qualitative study. J Health Organisat Manag2016; 30(4): 648–665.
15.
BismarkMMorrisJThomasL, et al.Reasons and remedies for underrepresentation of women in medical leadership roles: a qualitative study from Australia. BMJ Open2015; 5(11): e009384.
16.
GomezLEBernetP. Diversity improves performance and outcomes. J Natl Med Assoc2019; 111(4): 383–392.
17.
Kubik-HuchRAVilgrainVKGPReiserMF, et al.Women in radiology: gender diversity is not a metric – it is a tool for excellence. Eur Radiol2020; 30: 1644–1652.
18.
DownsJAReifLKHokororoA, et al.Increasing women in leadership in global health. Acad Med2014; 89(8): 1103–1107.
19.
DotsonENuru-JeterA. Setting the stage for a business case for leadership diversity in healthcare: history, research, and leverage. J Healthc Manag2012; 57(1): 35–44.
20.
OffermannLFoleyK. Is there a female leadership advantage? In Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
21.
CampbellKMínguez-VeraA. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. J Bus Ethics2008; 83(3): 435–451.
22.
EllwoodSGarcia-LacalleJ. New development: women with altitude—exploring the influence of female presence and leadership on boards of directors. Publ Money Manag2018; 38(1): 73–78.
23.
ArenaCCatuognoSSaggeseS, et al.Gender diversity in public hospitals’ TMT: the impact on financial and non-financial performance. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Gender Research ICGR, Manchester, 2019, pp. 43–50. Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
24.
Paustian-UnderdahlSCWalkerLSWoehrDJ. Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: a meta-analysis of contextual moderators. J Appl Psychol2014; 99(6): 1129–1145.
25.
EaglyAHJohannesen‐SchmidtMC. The leadership styles of women and men. J Soc Issues2001; 57(4): 781–797.
26.
Lopez-ZafraEGarcia-RetameroRMartosMPB. The relationship between transformational leadership and emotional intelligence from a gendered approach. Psychol Rec2012; 62(1): 97–114.
27.
WrightBEPandeySK. Transformational leadership in the public sector: does structure matter?J Publ Adm Res Theor2010; 20(1): 75–89.
28.
VecchioR. Leadership and gender advantage. Leader Q2002; 13: 643–671.
29.
AthanasopoulouAMoss-CowanASmetsM, et al.Claiming the corner office: female CEO careers and implications for leadership development. Hum Resour Manag2018; 57: 617–639.
30.
BudworthMMannSL. Becoming a leader: the challenge of modesty for women. J Manag Dev2010; 29(2): 177–186.
31.
HopkinsMMO’NeilDA. Women and success: dilemmas and opportunities. In: BilimoriaDPideritSK (eds). Handbook on women in business and management. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar, 2007, pp. 132–153.
32.
FitzsimmonsTWCallanVJPaulsenN. Gender disparity in the C-suite: do male and female CEOs differ in how they reached the top?Leader Q2014; 25(2): 245–266.
33.
ScheinVEMuellerRLituchyT, et al.Think manager–think male: a global phenomenon?J Organ Behav1996; 17(1): 33–41.
34.
CostaPTTerraccianoAMcCraeRR. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. J Pers Soc Psychol2001; 81(2): 322–331.
35.
FitzsimmonsTWCallanVJ. Applying a capital perspective to explain continued gender inequality in the C-suite. Leader Q2016; 27(3): 354–370.
36.
SartiranaMPrenestiniALegaF. Medical management: hostage to its own history? the case of Italian clinical directors. Int J Public Sect Manag2014; 27(5): 417–429.
37.
SaporitoRSartiranaMTozziVD. La femminilizzazione dei ruoli apicali in sanità: dimensioni del fenomeno, cause e prospettive. In Rapporto OASI 2019, Milano, Egea, 2019.
38.
SartiranaMCurrieGNoordegraafM. Interactive identity work of professionals in management: a hospital case study. Publ Manag Rev2019; 21(8): 1191–1212.
39.
KvaleSBrinkmannS. Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. California: Sage Publications, 2009.
40.
CorbinJMStraussA. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 4th ed.Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage, 2015.
41.
SaldanaJ. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed.Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage Publications Ltd, 2012.
42.
MantereSKetokiviM. Reasoning in organization science. Acad Manag Rev2013; 38(1): 70–89.
