Since the early 1990s, New Public Management ideas have deeply influenced reforms and their implementation in the Italian NHS. We compare doctors’ perceptions about management systems in two Italian regions which differ in the dominant values of the regional political environment. In total 220 doctors, orthopaedists and cardiologists, working in public hospitals in Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna, were surveyed. Doctors in Emilia-Romagna perceived their organization to be more managerially driven in comparison to their colleagues in Lombardy. Doctors from Lombardy perceived their professional freedom to be higher, regardless of their specialization. The divergence of professionals’ perception between these two Italian regions, which operate within the same Beveridge model, shows that dominant values of regional politics may have tangible effects on hospital management.
SaltmanRB. The context for health reform in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, and the United States. Health Policy1997; 41: S9–S26.
2.
Anessi-PessinaECantùE. Whither managerialism in the Italian National Health Service?Int J Health Plann Manage2006; 21: 327–355.
3.
FerreraM. The rise and fall of democratic universalism: health care reform in Italy, 1978-1994. J Health Polit Policy L1995; 20: 275–302.
4.
FattoreG. Cost containment reforms in the Italian national health service. In: MossialosELe GranJ (eds). Health care and cost containment in the European Union. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.; 1999.
5.
LegaF. Lights and shades in the managerialization of the Italian National Health Service. Health Serv Manage Res2008; 21: 248–261.
6.
SartiranaMPrenestiniALegaF. Medical management: hostage to its own history? the case of Italian clinical directors. Int J Public Sec Manage2014; 27: 417–429.
7.
MacinatiMSRizzoMG. Budget goal commitment, clinical managers’ use of budget information and performance. Health Policy2014; 117: 228–238.
8.
TediosiFGabrieleSLongoF. Governing decentralization in health care under tough budget constraint: what can we learn from the Italian experience?Health Policy2009; 90: 303–312.
9.
TousijnWGiorginoVMB. The complexities of negotiating governance change: introducing managerialism in Italy. Health Econ Policy Law2009; 4: 329–346.
10.
DentM. Post-New Public Management in public sector hospitals? The UK, Germany and Italy. Policy Polit2005; 33: 623–636.
11.
DoolinB. Doctors as managers - new public management in a New Zealand hospital. Public Management Rev2001; 3: 231–254.
12.
KitchenerMKirkpatrickIWhippR. Supervising Professional Work under New Public Management: evidence from an ‘invisible trade’. Br J Management2000; 11: 213–226.
13.
HoodC. A public management for all seasons?Public Adm1991; 69: 3–19.
14.
AtkinsonSMedeirosRLROliveiraPHL, et al.Going down to the local: incorporating social organisation and political culture into assessments of decentralised health care. Social Sci Med2000; 51: 619–636.
15.
AbimbolaSBaatiemaLBigdeliM. The impacts of decentralization on health system equity, efficiency and resilience: a realist synthesis of the evidence. Health Policy Plan2019; 34: 605–617.
16.
SaltmanRB. Decentralization, re-centralization and future European health policy. Eur J Public Health2008; 18: 104–106.
17.
BurauVWilsfordDFranceG. Reforming medical governance in Europe. What is it about institutions?Health Econ Policy L2009; 4: 265–281.
18.
TothF. How health care regionalisation in Italy is widening the North-South gap. Health Econ Policy L2014; 9: 231–249.
19.
MauroMMaressoAGuglielmoA. Health decentralization at a dead-end: towards new recovery plans for Italian hospitals. Health Policy2017; 121: 582–587.
20.
LongoF. Lessons from the Italian NHS retrenchment policy. Health Policy2016; 120: 306–315.
21.
FerréFde BelvisAGValerioL, et al.Italy Health system review. Health Syst Transit2014; 16: 1–168.
22.
Lo ScalzoADonatiniAOrzellaL, et al.Italy: health systems review. Health Syst Transit2009; 11: 1–216.
23.
ColomboA. The ‘Lombardy Model’: subsidiarity-informed regional governance. Social Policy Adm2008; 42: 177–196.
24.
BrennaE. Quasi-market and cost-containment in beveridge systems: The Lombardy model of Italy. Health Policy2011; 103: 209–218. Epub ahead of print October 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.10.003.
25.
Anessi-PessinaECantùEJoniniiC. Phasing out market mechanisms in the Italian national health service. Public Money Management2004; 24: 309–316.
26.
JommiCCantùEAnessi-PessinaE. New funding arrangements in the Italian national health service. Int J Health Plann Manage2001; 16: 347–368.
27.
Lippi BruniMNobilioLUgoliniC. The analysis of a cardiological network in a regulated setting: a spatial interaction approach. Health Econ2008; 17: 221–233.
28.
FattoreGLongoF. Le tendenze evolutive nei sistemi regionali: analisi di alcuni Piani Sanitari rappresentativi. In: Anessi PessinaECantùE (eds) Rapporto OASI 2002: L’aziendalizzazione della sanità in Italia. Milano: EGEA, 2002, pp. 118–145.
29.
SaltmanRBBankauskaiteV. Conceptualizing decentralization in European health systems: a functional perspective. Health Econ Policy L2006; 1: 127–147.
30.
ElstonMA. The politics of professional power: medicine in a changing health service. In: GabeJCalnanM (eds). The sociology of the health service. London: Routledge; 1991, pp. 58–88.
31.
LewisJMMarjoribanksT. The impact of financial constraints and incentives on professional autonomy. Int J Health Plann Manage2003; 18: 49–61.
32.
SchulzRHarrisonS. Physician autonomy in the Federal Republic of Germany, Great Britain and the United States. Int J Health Plann Manage1986; 1: 335–355. Epub ahead of print 1986. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.4740010504.
33.
BarasaEWManyaraAMMolyneuxS, et al.Recentralization within decentralization: county hospital autonomy under devolution in Kenya. PLOS ONE2017; 12: e0182440.
34.
CalciolariSPrenestiniALegaF. An organizational culture for all seasons? how cultural type dominance and strength influence different performance goals. Public Manage Rev2018; 20: 1400–1422.
35.
HoodC.The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, doi:10.1093/0198297653.001.0001.
36.
WadmannSJohansenSLindA, et al.Analytical perspectives on performance-based management: an outline of theoretical assumptions in the existing literature. Health Econ Policy L2013; 8: 511–527.
37.
NumeratoDSalvatoreDFattoreG. The impact of management on medical professionalism: a review. Sociol Health Illn2012; 34: 626–644.
38.
SartiranaM. Beyond hybrid professionals: evidence from the hospital sector. BMC Health Serv Res2019; 19: 634.
39.
FreidsonE. The Reorganization of the medical profession. Med Care Rev1985; 42: 11–35.
40.
WaringJ. Restratification, hybridity and professional elites: questions of power, identity and relational contingency at the points of ‘professional-organisational intersection’. Sociol Compass2014; 8: 688–704.
41.
PrenestiniA. Esplorare le culture organizzative delle Aziende Sanitarie Pubbliche: analisi e confronto in cinque SSR. In: CantùE (ed). L’aziendalizzazione della sanità in Italia. Rapporto OASI 2012. Milano: EGEA; 2012, pp. 223–236.
42.
NutiSSeghieriC. Is variation management included in regional healthcare governance systems? some proposals from Italy. Health Policy2014; 114: 71–78.
43.
PavoliniEVicarelliG. Is decentralization good for your health? transformations in the Italian NHS. Curr Sociol2012; 60: 472–488.
44.
KrauseEA. Doctors, partitocrazia, and the Italian state. The Milbank Q1988; 66(Suppl 2): 148–166.
