Do online health communities enhance patient–physician relationship? An assessment of the impact of social support and patient empowerment

Abstract

The diffusion of the Web 2.0 has made it possible for patients to exchange on online health communities, defined as computer-mediated communities dedicated to health topics, wherein members can build relationships with other members. It is now acknowledged that online health communities provide users not only with medical information but also with social support with no time or geographical boundaries. However, in spite of their considerable interest, there is still a paucity of research as to how online health communities alter the patient–physician relationship. This research aims at filling this gap and examines how online health communities, while providing users with computer-mediated social support and empowerment, impact the patient–physician relationship. Six hypotheses are proposed and tested. A survey was developed and 328 responses were collected from online patient groups in Canada in 2016. The data were analysed using structural equation modelling. All but one hypothesis are validated. The results show that user computer-mediated social support positively influences user empowerment and participation during the consultation, which in turn determines user commitment to the relationship with the physician. Importantly and contrary to our expectations, user empowerment is found to be significantly but negatively related to user commitment with the physician.

Keywords

empowerment online health communities patient–physician relationship social support

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cotten

Gupta

SS.

Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59: 1795–1806.

Gupta

Hee-Woong

Developing the commitment to virtual community: the balanced effects of cognition and affect. Inform Res Manag J 2007; 20: 28–45.

McMullan

Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient–health professional relationship. Pat

Educ Counsel 2006; 63: 24–28.

Lee

The effect of computer-mediated social support in online communities on patient empowerment and doctor-patient communication. Health Commun 2012; 27: 30–41.

Malik

Coulson

NS.

Computer-mediated infertility support groups: an explanatory study of online experiences. Pat Educ Counsel 2008; 73: 105–113.

Nambisan

Evaluating patient experience in online health communities: implications for health care organizations. Health Care Manag Rev 2011; 36: 124–133.

Erdem

Harrisson-Walker

LJ.

The role of Internet in physician–patient relationships: the issue of trust. Bus Horiz 2006; 49: 387–393.

Lemire

Sicotte

Paré

Internet use and the logics of personal empowerment in health. Health Policy 2008; 88: 130–140.

Van Uden-Kraan

Drossaert

Taal

et al . Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients’ empowerment. Patient Educ Counsel 2009; 74: 61–69.

10.

PKH

Coulson

NS.

Developing a model for online support group use, empowering processes and psychosocial outcomes for individuals living with HIV/AIDS, Psychol

Health 2012; 27: 445–459.

11.

Zimet

Dahlem

Zimet

et al . The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Personal Assess 1988; 52: 30–41.

12.

Procidano

Heller

Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: three validation studies. Am J Commun Psychol 1983; 11: 1–24.

13.

Rozmovits

Ziebland

What do patients with prostate or breast cancer want from an Internet site? A qualitative study of information needs. Pat Educ Counsel. 2004; 53: 57–64.

14.

Gibson

CH.

A concept analysis of patient empowerment. J Adv Nurs 1991; 16: 354–361.

15.

Denegri-Knott

Zwick

Schroeder

Mapping consumer power: an integrative framework for marketing and consumer research. Eur J Market 2006; 40: 950–971.

16.

Gutschoven

and

van den Bulck

Towards the measurement of psychological health empowerment in the general public. In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany, 2006.

17.

Wathieu

Brenner

Carmon

et al . A primer. Market Lett 2002; 13: 297–305.

18.

Ouschan

Sweeney

Johnson

Customer empowerment and relationship outcomes in healthcare consultations. Eur J Market 2006; 40: 1068–1086.

19.

Teas

Wong

JK.

A test of the effects of retail store rating context on the stability of alternative multisensitivity scaling methods. Int J Res Market 1992; 13: 17–28.

20.

Ybarra

Suman

Help seeking behaviour and the Internet: a national survey. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75: 29–41.

21.

Morgan

Hunt

SD.

The commitment–trust theory of relationship marketing. J Market 1994; 58: 20–38.

22.

Nunnally

JC.

Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill, 1978.

23.

Nunnally

Bernstein

JR.

Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1994.

24.

Fornell

Larker

DF.

Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res 1981; 18: 39–50.

25.

Sharma

Mukherjee

Kumar

et al . A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. J Bus Res 2005; 58: 935–943.

26.

Cucciniello

Lapsley

Nasi

Managing health care in the digital world: a comparative analysis. Health Serv Manage Res 2016; 29: 132–142.

27.

Wald

Dube

Anthony

DC.

Untangling the web – the impact of Internet use on health care and the physician–patient relationship. Pat Educ Counsel 2007; 68: 218–224.

28.

Petrovcic

Petric

Differences in intrapersonal and interactional empowerment between lurkers and posters in health-related online support communities. Comput Human Behav 2014; 34: 39–48.

29.

Camacho

Jong

Stremersch

The effect of customer empowerment on adherence to expert advice. Int J Res Market 2014; 31: 293–308.

30.

Zhao

Widdows

Building trusting relationships in online health communities. Cyberpsychol, Behav Social Network 2013; 16: 650–657.