This paper argues that a cost/benefit-type economic analysis of whether or not to prohibit euthanasia should not be undertaken by health services managers unless ethical issues have been resolved to a particular conclusion. A conclusion on ethical grounds in favour of the prohibition of euthanasia renders the consideration of economic criteria redundant. The case of the German euthanasia programme in the 1930s is used to illustrate the danger of attempting to combine ethical and economic criteria into a single decision rule.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CleaverC.GrantE.RotheM.Lessons from history's most calamitous experience: events leading to the Holocaust. In: WilkieJ. C. (ed.) Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Past and Present. Cincinnati: Hayes, 1998: 5–15
2.
LeenanH. J.The definition of euthanasia. Medicine and Law1984; 3: 333–8
3.
MooneyG.The Valuation of Human Life. London: Macmillan Press, 1977
4.
WardP. R.Healthcare rationing: can we afford to ignore euthanasia?Health Services Management Research1997; 10: 32–41
5.
WerthamF.The geranium in the window. In: WilkieJ. C. (ed.) Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Past and Present. Cincinnati: Hayes, 1998: 17–57
