Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) have emerged as an attractive category of nanofiltration (NF) membranes, offering a promising solution to address the intrinsic trade-off that exist between permeability and selectivity in conventional polymeric membranes. This review article aims to comprehensively discuss advances reported over the past 5–10 years achieved in the field of MMMs and critically analyzes the mechanisms through which a diversity of additives affects nanofiltration behavior. The discussed researches primarily address the separation of target solutes including salts, dyes, pharmaceuticals, and heavy metals, with primary applications in water treatment and wastewater reuse. Particular emphasis is placed not only on material design but also on interfacial compatibility, performance limitations, and the permeability-selectivity trade-off. Advanced inorganic fillers, such as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs), and MXenes, have attracted many attentions because of providing special architecture, great specific surface area, and ability to give selective transport pathways. Traditional inorganic fillers (TiO2, ZnO, SiO2, halloysite nanotubes, Fe3O4, and ZrO2), carbon-based materials (including graphene derivatives, carbon nanotubes, and graphitic carbon nitride), and organic fillers (such as porous organic cages (POCs), and β-cyclodextrin) are comparatively discussed in terms of their merits and practical restrictions. This review indicates the relationships existing between structure, properties, and performance in various MMM designs, and provides some suggestions for future research directions. Beyond performance enhancement, this review discusses trade-offs between permeability and selectivity, filler dispersion challenges, interfacial defects, long-term stability concerns, and scalability constraints that may hinder practical implementation. The eventual aim is to develop the next generation of nanofiltration mixed matrix membranes possessing high efficiency, improved selectivity, and long-term stability.
KayaCJarmaYAGulerE, et al.Seawater desalination by using nanofiltration (NF) and brackish water reverse osmosis (BWRO) membranes in sequential mode of operation. J Membr Sci Res2020; 6: 40–46.
2.
KhademianESalehiESanaeepurH, et al.A systematic review on carbohydrate biopolymers for adsorptive remediation of copper ions from aqueous environments-part A: classification and modification strategies. Sci Total Environ2020; 738: 139829.
3.
AhmadiRSedighianRSanaeepurH, et al.Polyphenylsulfone/zinc ion-exchanged zeolite Y nanofiltration mixed matrix membrane for water desalination. J Appl Polym Sci2022; 139: 52262.
4.
AlsalhyQFAliJMAbbasAA, et al.Enhancement of poly (phenyl sulfone) membranes with ZnO nanoparticles. Desalin Water Treat2013; 51: 6070–6081.
5.
ChengYYingYJapipS, et al.Advanced porous materials in mixed matrix membranes. Adv Mater2018; 30: 1802401.
ZhuQCaiZZhouP, et al.Recent progress of membrane technology for chiral separation: a comprehensive review. Sep Purif Technol2023; 309: 123077.
8.
VatanpourVTeberOMehrabiM, et al.Polyvinyl alcohol-based separation membranes: a comprehensive review on fabrication techniques, applications and future prospective. Mater Today Chem2023; 28: 101381.
9.
Vinh-ThangHKaliaguineS. Predictive models for mixed-matrix membrane performance: a review. Chem Rev2013; 113: 4980–5028.
10.
MahdaviHMarandiAKaramiM, et al.Efficient dye rejection using a mixed matrix polyphenylsulfone/polysulfone membrane containing basil seed mucilage hydrogel. J Environ Chem Eng2022; 10: 108767.
11.
HeidariAAMahdaviHMarandiA, et al.TFN Membrane fabricated by a gyroid-like PE support, a basil seed mucilage–fe (III) interlayer, and a polyamide active layer incorporated with MIL-101 (cr)–NH2 nanoparticles. ACS Appl Polym Mater2022; 5: 899–912.
12.
DechnikJGasconJDoonanCJ, et al.Mixed-matrix membranes. Angew Chem Int Ed2017; 56: 9292–9310.
13.
FarahaniMHDAVatanpourV. Polymer/carbon nanotubes mixed matrix membranes for water purification. In: Nanoscale materials in water purification. Iran: Elsevier, 2019, pp.87–110.
14.
BashirJIlyasSAsifA, et al.Polyelectrolyte multilayer-based nanofiltration membranes with tunable performance for target pollutants. ACS Appl Polym Mater2025; 7: 3147–3156.
15.
LiuYDuJWuH, et al.Antifouling streptomycin-based nanofiltration membrane with high permselectivity for dye/salt separation. Sep Purif Technol2022; 297: 121443.
16.
TavangarTKarimiMRezakazemiM, et al.Textile waste, dyes/inorganic salts separation of cerium oxide-loaded loose nanofiltration polyethersulfone membranes. Chem Eng J2020; 385: 123787.
17.
MahdaviHKaramiMHeidariAA. Preparation of mixed matrix membranes made up of polysulfone and MIL-53 (Al) nanoparticles as promising membranes for separation of aqueous dye solutions. Sep Purif Technol2021; 274: 119033.
18.
ShuLXieL-HMengY, et al.A thin and high loading two-dimensional MOF nanosheet based mixed-matrix membrane for high permeance nanofiltration. J Membr Sci2020; 603: 118049.
19.
Castro-MunozRAgrawalKVLaiZ, et al.Towards large-scale application of nanoporous materials in membranes for separation of energy-relevant gas mixtures. Sep Purif Technol2023; 308: 122919.
20.
ShiSLiuRQiG, et al.Polyvinylidene fluoride-based loose nanofiltration membrane with graphene oxide intercalation for efficient small organic molecules desalination. Sep Purif Technol2025; 354: 128869.
21.
GhanbariRZareENPaiva-SantosAC, et al.Ti3C2Tx MXene@ MOF decorated polyvinylidene fluoride membrane for the remediation of heavy metals ions and desalination. Chemosphere2023; 311: 137191.
22.
LiangQWangSJiY, et al.Preparation of a high performance PES/PES-OH loose nanofiltration membrane based on reactive porogen. Sep Purif Technol2025; 355: 129688.
23.
MahdaviHHosseiniFHeidariAA, et al.Polyethersulfone-TPU blend membrane coated with an environmentally friendly sabja seed mucilage-Cu2 + cross-linked layer with outstanding separation performance and superior antifouling. J Ind Eng Chem2023; 121: 421–433.
24.
SunCXiaoMTianJ, et al.Surface modification of PSF membranes using interfacial polymerization of BiOCl/MIL-101 (Fe)@ PDA for improving photocatalytic nanofiltration performance toward tetracycline. Sep Purif Technol2025; 354: 129124.
25.
MahdaviHKhademiFHeidariAA, et al.Fabrication of mixed matrix polyphenylsulfone-polysulfone blend membranes incorporated with nickel/hydrazine@ silica core-shell nanoparticles using VIPS-NIPS method for efficient dye rejection. J Appl Polym Sci2023; 140: e54564.
26.
VoTSLwinKMKimK. Recent developments of nano-enhanced composite membranes designed for water/wastewater purification—a review. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater2024; 7: 127.
27.
MansourianRMousaviSMRahimpourMR. Polymeric membranes. In: Current trends and future developments on (bio-) membranes. Iran: Elsevier, 2024, pp.349–366.
28.
HeidariAAMahdaviH. Recent development of polyolefin-based microporous separators for li− ion batteries: a review. Chem Rec2020; 20: 570–595.
29.
KarkiSHazarikaGYadavD, et al.Polymeric membranes for industrial applications: recent progress, challenges and perspectives. Desalination2024; 573: 117200.
30.
FrancisVNChongJYYangG, et al.Robust polyamide-PTFE hollow fibre membranes for harsh organic solvent nanofiltration. Chem Eng J2023; 452: 139333.
31.
ZhangYTanYSunR, et al.Preparation of ceramic membranes and their application in wastewater and water treatment. Water (Basel)2023; 15: 3344.
32.
KyriiS. Materials and methods for ceramic membrane synthesis. Short review. Water and water purification technologies. Sci Tech News2023; 35: 26–45.
33.
AbdaliAEskandarabadiSMMahmoudianM. Inorganic nanofillers in mix matrix membranes for pervaporation process: a review. Polymer2024; 312: 127575.
34.
AbdullahRAstiraDWidyantoAR, et al.Recent development of mixed matrix membrane as a membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: a review. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng2023; 8: 100485.
35.
PiotrowskiKSakiewiczPGołombekK. Halloysite as main nanostructural filler in multifunctional mixed matrix membranes–review of applications and new possibilities. Desalin Water Treat2021; 243: 91–106.
36.
BatoolMShafeeqAHaiderB, et al.Tio2 nanoparticle filler-based mixed-matrix PES/CA nanofiltration membranes for enhanced desalination. Membranes2021; 11: 433.
37.
DmitrenkoMKuzminovaAZolotarevA, et al.Nanofiltration mixed matrix membranes from cellulose modified with zn-based metal–organic frameworks for the enhanced water treatment from heavy metal ions. Polymers (Basel)2023; 15: 1341.
38.
YaoAHuaDZhaoF, et al.Integration of P84 and porphyrin–based 2D MOFs (M− TCPP, M = Zn, Cu, Co, Ni) for mixed matrix membranes towards enhanced performance in organic solvent nanofiltration. Sep Purif Technol2022; 282: 120022.
39.
MokhtariNDinariMFashandiH. Developing polysulfone-based mixed matrix membrane containing hydrazone-linked covalent organic frameworks towards dye wastewater purification. Chem Eng J2022; 446: 137456.
40.
VatanpourVPazireshS. A melamine-based covalent organic framework nanomaterial as a nanofiller in polyethersulfone mixed matrix membranes to improve separation and antifouling performance. J Appl Polym Sci2022; 139: 51428.
41.
WangCLiZChenJ, et al.Zwitterionic functionalized “cage-like” porous organic frameworks for nanofiltration membrane with high efficiency water transport channels and anti-fouling property. J Membr Sci2018; 548: 194–202.
42.
DingYXiaMYuJ, et al.In situ conversion of ZnO to ZIF-8 in polyimide for ultra-high permeance organic solvent nanofiltration mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci2024; 709: 123110.
43.
WuSShiWCuiL, et al.Enhancing contaminant rejection efficiency with ZIF-8 molecular sieving in sustainable mixed matrix membranes. Chem Eng J2024; 482: 148954.
44.
GayatriRFizalANSYuliwatiE, et al.Preparation and characterization of PVDF–TiO2 mixed-matrix membrane with PVP and PEG as pore-forming agents for BSA rejection. Nanomaterials2023; 13: 1023.
ShenYYaoALiJ, et al.Dispersive two-dimensional MXene via potassium fulvic acid for mixed matrix membranes with enhanced organic solvent nanofiltration performance. J Membr Sci2023; 666: 121168.
47.
MaWPanJRenW, et al.Fabrication of antibacterial and self-cleaning CuxP@ g-C3N4/PVDF-CTFE mixed matrix membranes with enhanced properties for efficient ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci2022; 659: 120792.
ErraguedRSharmaMCostaC, et al.Novel polyethersulfone mixed matrix adsorptive nanofiltration membrane fabricated from embedding zinc oxide coated by polyaniline. J Environ Chem Eng2023; 11: 111607.
50.
MahdaviHKaramiM. Cross-linked mixed matrix membranes made up of amine-functionalized silica and chloromethylated polysulfone for organic solvent nanofiltration applications. J Environ Chem Eng2022; 10: 107145.
51.
Al-TimimiDAHAlsalhyQFAbdulRazakAA. Polyethersulfone/amine grafted silica nanoparticles mixed matrix membrane: a comparative study for mebeverine hydrochloride wastewater treatment. Alexandria Eng J2023; 66: 167–190.
52.
ZhuLYuHZhangH, et al.Mixed matrix membranes containing MIL-53 (Al) for potential application in organic solvent nanofiltration. RSC Adv2015; 5: 73068–73076.
53.
KariduraganavarMYVargheseJGChoudhariSK, et al.Organic− inorganic hybrid membranes: solving the trade-off phenomenon between permeation flux and selectivity in pervaporation. Ind Eng Chem Res2009; 48: 4002–4013.
54.
AbdulhamidMAParkS-HVovushaH, et al.Molecular engineering of high-performance nanofiltration membranes from intrinsically microporous poly (ether-ether-ketone). J Mater Chem A2020; 8: 24445–24454.
55.
TanXRodrigueD. A review on porous polymeric membrane preparation. Part I: production techniques with polysulfone and poly (vinylidene fluoride). Polymers (Basel)2019; 11: 1160.
56.
GhadhbanMYRashidKTAbdulrazakAA, et al.Modification of polylactide-poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)(PLA/PBAT) mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) with green banana peel additives for oil wastewater treatment. Water (Basel)2024; 16: 1040.
57.
Abu-ZuraykRAlnairatNWaleedH, et al.Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and nanoclay composites’ mixed-matrix membranes: exploring structure, properties, and performance relationships. Polymers (Basel)2025; 17: 1120.
58.
SalahZAloulouHAlgieriC, et al.Polysulfone/MMT clay mixed matrix membranes for efficient diclofenac removal and improved antifouling performance in wastewater treatment. Membranes2025; 15: 344.
59.
AlsalhyQFMohammedAAAhmedSH, et al.Estimation of nanofiltration membrane transport parameters for cobalt ions removal from aqueous solutions. Desalin Water Treat2018; 108: 235–245.
60.
IbraheemBMAl-TimimiDAHAbdullahSN, et al.Decoration of polyethersulfone membranes with zinc oxide nanoparticles for efficient treatment of food dyes. Chem Eng Res Des2025; 218: 312–327.
61.
PandeyRPRasheedPAGomezT, et al.A fouling-resistant mixed-matrix nanofiltration membrane based on covalently cross-linked Ti3C2TX (MXene)/cellulose acetate. J Membr Sci2020; 607: 118139.
62.
GhadhbanMYRashidKTAbdulrazakAA, et al.A novel poly (lactic-acid) and poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blend membrane modified with hesperidin for oily water emulsions separation. Chem Eng Res Des2024; 206: 265–279.
63.
LaliaBSKochkodanVHashaikehR, et al.A review on membrane fabrication: structure, properties and performance relationship. Desalination2013; 326: 77–95.
RavichandranSRVenkatachalamCDSengottianM, et al.A review on fabrication, characterization of membrane and the influence of various parameters on contaminant separation process. Chemosphere2022; 306: 135629.
66.
ZhaoLZhangXHeB, et al.Micro-tubular solid oxide fuel cells with graded anodes fabricated with a phase inversion method. J Power Sources2011; 196: 962–967.
67.
JaafarJNasirAM. Grand challenge in membrane fabrication: membrane science and technology. Malaysia: Frontiers Media SA, 2022; 883913.
68.
PervinRGhoshPBasavarajMG. Tailoring pore distribution in polymer films via evaporation induced phase separation. RSC Adv2019; 9: 15593–15605.
69.
ChongHMuhammadSNorazmiS, et al.A review on membrane fabrication: structure, properties and performance relationship. J Appl Membr Sci Technol2025; 29: 73–97.
70.
Recent progress in microfiltration polypropylene membrane fabrication by stretching method. E3S web of conferences; 2018. EDP Sciences.
71.
Ranjbarzadeh-DibazarAShokrollahiPBarzinJ, et al.Lubricant facilitated thermo-mechanical stretching of PTFE and morphology of the resulting membranes. J Membr Sci2014; 470: 458–469.
72.
LeeS-YParkS-YSongH-S. Lamellar crystalline structure of hard elastic HDPE films and its influence on microporous membrane formation. Polymer2006; 47: 3540–3547.
73.
FengSZhongZWangY, et al.Progress and perspectives in PTFE membrane: preparation, modification, and applications. J Membr Sci2018; 549: 332–349.
74.
ChenXWanCYuR, et al.Fabrication of amidoximated polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous membrane by simultaneously biaxial stretching for uranium extraction from seawater. Desalination2020; 486: 114447.
75.
LiYZhuJChengH, et al.Developments of advanced electrospinning techniques: a critical review. Adv Mater Technol2021; 6: 2100410.
76.
ShioharaAPrieto-SimonBVoelckerNH. Porous polymeric membranes: fabrication techniques and biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B2021; 9: 2129–2154.
77.
StarostaW. Radiation use in producing track-etched membranes. Inst Nucl Chem Technol2015: 1–32.
FürediMtManzanoCV, et al.Guldin S. Beyond the meso/macroporous boundary: extending capillary condensation-based pore size characterization in thin films through tailored adsorptives. J Phys Chem Lett2024; 15: 1420–1427.
80.
ColomerMT. Special issue “design, synthesis and applications of macroporous, mesoporous, and microporous materials”. MDPI2024; 25: 7127.
81.
SethSJhulkiS. Porous flexible frameworks: origins of flexibility and applications. Mater Horiz2021; 8: 700–727.
82.
ZhouD-DZhangJ-P. On the role of flexibility for adsorptive separation. Acc Chem Res2022; 55: 2966–2977.
83.
OnukiAOkamotoR. Selective solvation effects in phase separation in aqueous mixtures. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci2011; 16: 525–533.
84.
IngleUMLaliAM. Significance of porosity and pore accessibility for the selection of ion exchange adsorbents for chromatographic purification of macromolecules. Acta Chromatographica2017; 29: 5–24.
85.
ZhaoSZhaoZZhangX, et al.Polyamide membranes with tunable surface charge induced by dipole–dipole interaction for selective ion separation. Environ Sci Technol2024; 58: 5174–5185.
86.
TangCBrueningML. Ion separations with membranes. J Polym Sci A2020; 58: 2831–2856.
87.
WangCZChenJLiQH, et al.Pore size modulation in flexible metal-organic framework enabling high performance gas sensing. Angew Chem2023; 135: e202302996.
88.
WuFQiangSZhuX-D, et al.Fibrous MXene aerogels with tunable pore structures for high-efficiency desalination of contaminated seawater. Nano-Micro Lett2023; 15: 71.
89.
ChengYJoarderBDattaSJ, et al.Mixed matrix membranes with surface functionalized metal–organic framework sieves for efficient propylene/propane separation. Adv Mater2023; 35: 2300296.
90.
DennyMSMoretonJCBenzL, et al.Metal–organic frameworks for membrane-based separations. Nat Rev Mater2016; 1: 16078.
91.
ZhouH-CLongJRYaghiOM. Introduction to metal–organic frameworks. USA: ACS Publications, 2012, 673–674.
92.
GohSHLauHSYongWF. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)-based mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) for gas separation: a review on advanced materials in harsh environmental applications. Small2022; 18: 2107536.
93.
XiongQChenYYangD, et al.Constructing strategies for hierarchically porous MOFs with different pore sizes and applications in adsorption and catalysis. Mater Chem Front2022; 6: 2944–2967.
94.
HundessaNKHuC-CKangD-Y, et al.Ultra-high flux loose nanofiltration membrane based on metal organic framework (CAU-10-H)/P84 co-polyimide for dye/salt fractionation from industrial waste water. Desalination2024; 586: 117871.
95.
MaruKKallaSJangirR. Efficient dye extraction from wastewater using indium-MOF-immobilized polyvinylidene fluoride membranes with selective filtration for enhanced remediation. Langmuir2024; 40: 8144–8161.
96.
LinRHernandezBVGeL, et al.Metal organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: an overview on filler/polymer interfaces. J Mater Chem A2018; 6: 293–312.
97.
ChengYYingYZhaiL, et al.Mixed matrix membranes containing MOF@ COF hybrid fillers for efficient CO2/CH4 separation. J Membr Sci2019; 573: 97–106.
98.
YuSLiCZhaoS, et al.Recent advances in the interfacial engineering of MOF-based mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. Nanoscale2024; 16: 7716–7733.
99.
ZengHYuZShaoL, et al.A novel strategy for enhancing the performance of membranes for dyes separation: embedding PAA@ UiO-66-NH2 between graphene oxide sheets. Chem Eng J2021; 403: 126281.
100.
LiuPXingQHuangR, et al.Incorporating hydrophilic amino-modified UiO-66 nanoparticles into polyphenylsulfone membrane for improved dye/salt separation. Chem Eng J2024; 499: 156096.
101.
KiranAAnjumTKhanAL, et al.Enhancing water purification efficiency with zirconium-mercaptosuccinic acid metal-organic framework integrated mixed matrix membranes: synthesis, comprehensive characterization, and performance insights. Chem Eng Res Des2024; 211: 9–20.
102.
ChengXJiangXZhangY, et al.Building additional passageways in polyamide membranes with hydrostable metal organic frameworks to recycle and remove organic solutes from various solvents. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2017; 9: 38877–38886.
103.
ReddyASShardaPNehraS, et al.Advanced strategies in MOF-based mixed matrix membranes for propylene/propane separation: a critical review. Coord Chem Rev2024; 498: 215435.
104.
KatayamaYBentzKCCohenSM. Defect-free MOF-based mixed-matrix membranes obtained by corona cross-linking. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2019; 11: 13029–13037.
105.
WuJDaiQZhangH, et al.A defect-free MOF composite membrane prepared via in-situ binder-controlled restrained second-growth method for energy storage device. Energy Storage Materials2021; 35: 687–694.
106.
YangXChenXSuX, et al.A backbone support structure and capillary effect-induced high-flux MOF-based mixed-matrix membrane for selective dye/salt separation. Sep Purif Technol2024; 344: 127221.
107.
HardianRJiaJDiaz-MarquezA, et al.Design of mixed-matrix MOF membranes with asymmetric filler density and intrinsic MOF/polymer compatibility for enhanced molecular sieving. Adv Mater2024; 36: 2314206.
108.
YinYShiMRenY, et al.Wrinkle structure on multifunctional MOFs to facilitate PPCPs adsorption in wastewater. Chem Eng J2020; 387: 124196.
109.
WangCLinGZhaoJ, et al.Enhancing Au (III) adsorption capacity and selectivity via engineering MOF with mercapto-1, 3, 4-thiadiazole. Chem Eng J2020; 388: 124221.
110.
FeiLShenLChenC, et al.Assembling 99% MOFs into bioinspired rigid-flexible coupled membrane with significant permeability: the impacts of defects. Small2024; 20: 2306528.
111.
XuWZhangYWangJ, et al.Defects engineering simultaneously enhances activity and recyclability of MOFs in selective hydrogenation of biomass. Nat Commun2022; 13: 2068.
112.
WangZHuangJWangW, et al.Removal of norfloxacin from high salinity wastewater by Hf-porphyrin MOF with missing linker defects: insights into anion trapping and photoinduced charge transfer effects. Chem Eng J2023; 466: 143194.
113.
LiuPLyuJBaiP. Synthesis of mixed matrix membrane utilizing robust defective MOF for size-selective adsorption of dyes. Sep Purif Technol2025; 354: 128672.
114.
AjebeEGHuC-CHabteBA, et al. Α, α’-dibromo-p-xylene crosslinked MOF-5/polybenzimidazole mixed matrix membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration. Sep Purif Technol2025; 373: 133561.
115.
AjebeEGHuCCLugitoG, et al.Investigating the impact of metal ion variations in terephthalate metal–organic frameworks on the organic solvent nanofiltration performance of mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci2024; 700: 122715.
116.
SalehianSMehdipourMHFotovatF, et al.Photocatalytic TiO2@ MIL-88A (Fe)/polyacrylonitrile mixed matrix membranes: characterization, anti-fouling properties, and performance on the removal of natural organic matter. Chemosphere2022; 302: 134893.
117.
ZhaoSZhengHXieY, et al.NH2-MIL-88B (Fe)/PVDF mixed matrix membranes: a one-stone-two-birds strategy for efficient removal of tetracycline hydrochloride from aquatic systems. J Environ Chem Eng2025; 13: 115100.
118.
ZhangHHouJHuY, et al.Ultrafast selective transport of alkali metal ions in metal organic frameworks with subnanometer pores. Sci Adv2018; 4: eaaq0066.
119.
LiYLiangFBuxH, et al.Zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-7 based molecular sieve membrane for hydrogen separation. J Membr Sci2010; 354: 48–54.
120.
AbdollahiBNajafidoustAAslEA, et al.Fabrication of ZiF-8 metal organic framework (MOFs)-based CuO-ZnO photocatalyst with enhanced solar-light-driven property for degradation of organic dyes. Arab J Chem2021; 14: 103444.
121.
Mahdavi FarRVan der BruggenBVerliefdeA, et al.A review of zeolite materials used in membranes for water purification: history, applications, challenges and future trends. J Chem Technol Biotechnol2022; 97: 575–596.
122.
LinJMuradS. A computer simulation study of the separation of aqueous solutions using thin zeolite membranes. Mol Phys2001; 99: 1175–1181.
123.
SiddiquiMAQSalveminiFRamandiHL, et al.Configurational diffusion transport of water and oil in dual continuum shales. Sci Rep2021; 11: 2152.
124.
LaiZ. Development of ZIF-8 membranes: opportunities and challenges for commercial applications. Curr Opin Chem Eng2018; 20: 78–85.
125.
CuiYChungT-S. Pharmaceutical concentration using organic solvent forward osmosis for solvent recovery. Nat Commun2018; 9: 1426.
126.
MalkapuramSTSeepanaMMSonawaneSH, et al.ZIF-8 decorated cellulose acetate mixed matrix membrane: an efficient approach for textile effluent treatment. Chemosphere2024; 349: 140836.
127.
YuCHeYZhangY, et al.Superfast water transport mixed matrix membranes with asymmetrical micro-nanostructures reinforced by metal–organic frameworks. Water Res2025; 282: 123767.
128.
DaiJLiSLiuJ, et al.Fabrication and characterization of a defect-free mixed matrix membrane by facile mixing PPSU with ZIF-8 core–shell microspheres for solvent-resistant nanofiltration. J Membr Sci2019; 589: 117261.
129.
AfshariMMoghadassiAHosseiniSM. Nanocomposite ZIF-8@ active carbon-co-chitosan incorporated nanofiltration membrane with enhanced antifouling property and high separation efficiency to salt, heavy metals, and dye solutions. Arab J Chem2024; 17: 105951.
130.
YinJTangHLiuD, et al.Application of ZIF-67 as a crosslinker to prepare sulfonated polysulfone mixed-matrix membranes for enhanced water permeability and separation properties. Water Sci Technol2021; 84: 144–158.
131.
PrabhakarNIsloorAMPadakiM, et al.Fabrication of TiO2@ ZIF-67 metal organic framework composite incorporated PVDF membranes for the removal of hazardous reactive black 5 and Congo red dyes from contaminated water. Chem Eng J2024; 498: 155270.
132.
GuptaNMurthyZ. Synthesis and application of ZIF-67 on the performance of polysulfone blend membranes. Mater Today Chem2022; 23: 100685.
133.
DeCosteJBPetersonGW. Metal–organic frameworks for air purification of toxic chemicals. Chem Rev2014; 114: 5695–5727.
134.
CavkaJHJakobsenSOlsbyeU, et al.A new zirconium inorganic building brick forming metal organic frameworks with exceptional stability. J Am Chem Soc2008; 130: 13850–13851.
135.
CoteAPBeninAIOckwigNW, et al.Yaghi OM. Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science2005; 310: 1166–1170.
136.
SongYSunQAguilaB, et al.Opportunities of covalent organic frameworks for advanced applications. Adv Sci2019; 6: 1801410.
137.
AsifMBKimSNguyenTS, et al.Covalent organic framework membranes and water treatment. J Am Chem Soc2024; 146: 3567–3584.
138.
MaXSunNLiZ, et al.Highly flexible and self-standing covalent organic framework–metal–organic framework (COF–MOF) composite crystalline porous material (CPM) membrane for molecular separation. Adv Funct Mater2024; 34: 2312203.
139.
NeemMMondalMPillaiRS, et al.Trifunctionalized ionic covalent organic framework-engineered mixed-matrix membranes for rapid and high-performance adsorptive separation of charged aqua pollutants. ACS Appl Eng Mater2024; 2: 2177–2189.
140.
ZhangLWangJZhangY, et al.Covalent triazine framework-based porous mixed matrix membranes for highly efficient dye/salt separation. Sep Purif Technol2024; 348: 127745.
141.
WangZZhangSChenY, et al.Covalent organic frameworks for separation applications. Chem Soc Rev2020; 49: 708–735.
142.
WangSWeiXLiZ, et al.Recent advances in developing mixed matrix membranes based on covalent organic frameworks. Sep Purif Technol2022; 301: 122004.
143.
DaiBHuYDingY, et al.Innovative construction of nano-wrinkled polyamide membranes using covalent organic framework nanoflowers for efficient desalination and antibiotic removal. Desalination2024; 570: 117083.
144.
LiuYWuHWuS, et al.Multifunctional covalent organic framework (COF)-based mixed matrix membranes for enhanced CO2 separation. J Membr Sci2021; 618: 118693.
145.
ChengYZhaiLYingY, et al.Highly efficient CO 2 capture by mixed matrix membranes containing three-dimensional covalent organic framework fillers. J Mater Chem A2019; 7: 4549–4560.
146.
PanYLiZShenS, et al.Preparation of PVDF mixed matrix membrane based on hydrophilic imine type covalent organic framework (COF) for dye and salt separation. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp2024; 686: 133431.
147.
GengKHeTLiuR, et al.Covalent organic frameworks: design, synthesis, and functions. Chem Rev2020; 120: 8814–8933.
148.
LiYWeiJWangJ, et al.Covalent organic frameworks as superior adsorbents for the removal of toxic substances. Chem Soc Rev2025; 54: 2693–2725.
149.
SuBZhangWKongL, et al.Constructing piperazine-integrated covalent organic framework nanofiltration membranes with enhanced antifouling properties for efficient and selective molecular separation. J Membr Sci2025; 736: 124695.
150.
NajiMASalimi-KenariHAlsalhyQF, et al.Novel mxene-modified polyphenyl sulfone membranes for functional nanofiltration of heavy metals-containing wastewater. Membranes2023; 13: 357.
151.
CardinaleAMCarboneCFortunatoM, et al.ZnAl-SO4 layered double hydroxide and allophane for Cr (VI), Cu (II) and Fe (III) adsorption in wastewater: structure comparison and synergistic effects. Materials (Basel)2022; 15: 6887.
152.
KarahanHEGohKZhangC, et al.MXene materials for designing advanced separation membranes. Adv Mater2020; 32: 1906697.
153.
LiZKWeiYGaoX, et al.Antibiotics separation with MXene membranes based on regularly stacked high-aspect-ratio nanosheets. Angew Chem Int Ed2020; 59: 9751–9756.
154.
DashtbozorgASaljoughiEMousaviSM, et al.High-performance and robust polysulfone nanocomposite membrane containing 2D functionalized MXene nanosheets for the nanofiltration of salt and dye solutions. Desalination2022; 527: 115600.
155.
XuNWangFGohPS, et al.Modification strategies for Ti3C2Tx MXene-based membranes to enhance nanofiltration performance: a review. Sep Purif Technol2024; 344: 127219.
156.
ChenS-rWangTZhuoX, et al.PVDF Mixed matrix membranes by incorporation of ionic liquid and MXene for enhancing permeation and antifouling performance. J Environ Chem Eng2022; 10: 108027.
157.
GeravandMHASaljoughiEMousaviSM, et al.Biodegradable polycaprolactone/MXene nanocomposite nanofiltration membranes for the treatment of dye solutions. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng2021; 128: 124–139.
158.
AzamRSAlmasriDAAlfahelR, et al.MXene (Ti3C2Tx)/cellulose acetate mixed-matrix membrane enhances fouling resistance and rejection in the crossflow filtration process. Membranes2022; 12: 406.
159.
ZhaoXCheYMoY, et al.Fabrication of PEI modified GO/MXene composite membrane and its application in removing metal cations from water. J Membr Sci2021; 640: 119847.
160.
ZhangLWangJRenX, et al.Internally extended growth of core–shell NH 2-MIL-101 (Al)@ ZIF-8 nanoflowers for the simultaneous detection and removal of Cu (ii). J Mater Chem A2018; 6: 21029–21038.
161.
LiuCZhangH-X. Modified-biochar adsorbents (MBAs) for heavy-metal ions adsorption: a critical review. J Environ Chem Eng2022; 10: 107393.
162.
ZhangHZhengYZhouH, et al.Nanocellulose-intercalated MXene NF membrane with enhanced swelling resistance for highly efficient antibiotics separation. Sep Purif Technol2023; 305: 122425.
163.
XuRKangYZhangW, et al.Two-dimensional MXene membranes with biomimetic sub-nanochannels for enhanced cation sieving. Nat Commun2023; 14: 4907.
164.
ZhangTChaconBZhangD, et al.Scalable synthesis of MXene scrolls. Adv Mater2026: e21457.
165.
GogotsiYAnasoriB. The rise of MXenes. ACS Nano2019; 13: 8491–8494. ACS Publications, 2019.
166.
VatanpourVMadaeniSSMoradianR, et al.Novel antibifouling nanofiltration polyethersulfone membrane fabricated from embedding TiO2 coated multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Sep Purif Technol2012; 90: 69–82.
167.
VatanpourVMadaeniSSKhataeeAR, et al.Tio2 embedded mixed matrix PES nanocomposite membranes: influence of different sizes and types of nanoparticles on antifouling and performance. Desalination2012; 292: 19–29.
168.
NematiMHosseiniSBagheripourE, et al.Electrodialysis heterogeneous anion exchange membranes filled with TiO2 nanoparticles: membranes’ fabrication and characterization. J Membr Sci Res2015; 1: 135–140.
169.
Zeid SAPerezABastideS, et al.Antibacterial and photocatalytic properties of ZnO nanostructure decorated coatings. Coatings2023; 14: 41.
170.
Podporska-CarrollJMylesAQuiltyB, et al.Antibacterial properties of F-doped ZnO visible light photocatalyst. J Hazard Mater2017; 324: 39–47.
171.
MitraPDuttaDDasS, et al.Antibacterial and photocatalytic properties of ZnO–9-aminoacridine hydrochloride hydrate drug nanoconjugates. ACS Omega2018; 3: 7962–7970.
172.
ZhengWDingRYanX, et al.PEG Induced tunable morphology and band gap of ZnO. Mater Lett2017; 201: 85–88.
173.
DuanZZhaoQWangS, et al.Halloysite nanotubes: natural, environmental-friendly and low-cost nanomaterials for high-performance humidity sensor. Sens Actuators, B2020; 317: 128204.
174.
SatishSTharmavaramMRawtaniD. Halloysite nanotubes as a nature’s boon for biomedical applications. Nanobiomedicine (Rij)2019; 6: 1849543519863625.
175.
MassaroMLazzaraGMiliotoS, et al.Covalently modified halloysite clay nanotubes: synthesis, properties, biological and medical applications. J Mater Chem B2017; 5: 2867–2882.
176.
TeowYHOoiBSAhmadAL, et al.Investigation of anti-fouling and UV-cleaning properties of PVDF/TiO2 mixed-matrix membrane for humic acid removal. Membranes2020; 11: 16.
177.
SakarkarSMuthukumaranSJegatheesanV. Tailoring the effects of titanium dioxide (TiO2) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) in the separation and antifouling performance of thin-film composite polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. Membranes2021; 11: 241.
178.
BilalAYasinMAkhtarFH, et al.Enhancing water purification by integrating Titanium dioxide nanotubes into polyethersulfone membranes for improved hydrophilicity and anti-fouling performance. Membranes2024; 14: 116.
179.
SafarpourMVatanpourVKhataeeA. Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide/TiO2 blended PES nanofiltration membrane with improved antifouling and separation performance. Desalination2016; 393: 65–78.
180.
JyothiMNayakVPadakiM, et al.The effect of UV irradiation on PSf/TiO2 mixed matrix membrane for chromium rejection. Desalination2014; 354: 189–199.
181.
TeowYAhmadALimJ, et al.Preparation and characterization of PVDF/TiO2 mixed matrix membrane via in situ colloidal precipitation method. Desalination2012; 295: 61–69.
182.
TeowYOoiBAhmadA, et al.Mixed-matrix membrane for humic acid removal: influence of different types of TiO2 on membrane morphology and performance. Int J Chem Eng Appl2012; 3: 374.
183.
CaoXMaJShiX, et al.Effect of TiO2 nanoparticle size on the performance of PVDF membrane. Appl Surf Sci2006; 253: 2003–2010.
184.
RanjbaranHAmeriEDehghaniB. Preparation of dendrimer/TiO2 polysulfone nanofiltration membrane to improve antibacterial, antifouling and separation performance of contaminants (heavy metals, salts, dyes). Polym Bull2024; 81: 1471–1494.
185.
GholamiFZinatizadehAAZinadiniS, et al.Enhanced antifouling and flux performances of a composite membrane via incorporating TiO2 functionalized with hydrophilic groups of L-cysteine for nanofiltration. Polym Adv Technol2022; 33: 1544–1560.
186.
LiuQBaselNLiL, et al.Interfacial polymerization of a covalent organic framework layer on titanium dioxide@ graphene oxide/polyacrylonitrile mixed-matrix membranes for high-performance dye separation. J Membr Sci2022; 647: 120296.
187.
MishraJRMohantySRathR, et al.Tailoring the PVDF membrane surface using a new and efficient ternary nanocomposite: ag@ TiO2@ MWCNT for water purification application. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp2025; 707: 135850.
188.
DanagodyBBoseNRajappanK. Fabrication and characterization of TiO2/Fe2O3 nanocomposites incorporated on novel ternary polymer blends for effective lead removal. Polym-Plast Technol Mater2024; 63: 23–37.
189.
NellurUKavyaKNaikNS, et al.Innovation of poly (ionic liquid)-stabilized TiO2 for membrane-based dye waste remediation. J Clean Prod2024; 483: 144268.
190.
LinZHuangJ. A hierarchical H3PW12O40/TiO2 nanocomposite with cellulose as scaffold for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Sep Purif Technol2021; 264: 118427.
191.
ZhafiriSAliBTIGunawanT, et al.Fabrication of PES/POM-TiO2 mixed matrix membrane with photocatalytic activity for methylene blue removal. Mater Today: Proc2023; 74: 471–475.
192.
DavarikiaYAroujalianASalimiP. Immobilization of TiO2 nanoparticles on PES substrate via dopamine and poly (vinyl alcohol) for long-term oil/water purification. Process Saf Environ Prot2022; 166: 656–668.
193.
WuHLiuYMaoL, et al.Doping polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane with TiO2-PDA nanohybrid for simultaneous self-cleaning and self-protection. J Membr Sci2017; 532: 20–29.
194.
KallemPPandeyRPHegabHM, et al.High-performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with hydrophilic PDA@ TiO2 nanocomposite substrate for the treatment of oily wastewater under PRO mode. J Environ Chem Eng2022; 10: 107454.
195.
al-ShaeliMAl-JubooriRAHilalN, et al.Minimizing chemicals usage for TiO2 immobilisation onto commercial PES membrane employing in-situ polymerisation: long-term performance and stability evaluation. Environ Technol Innov2025; 38: 104197.
196.
HuWChenSZhouB, et al.Facile synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles based on bacterial cellulose. Mater Sci Eng B2010; 170: 88–92.
197.
ErraguedRSharmaMGando-FerreiraLM, et al.Recovery of oleuropein from olive leaf extract using zinc oxide coated by polyaniline nanoparticle mixed matrix membranes. ACS Omega2024; 9: 4762–4774.
198.
AsghariMSalahshooriISalmaniS, et al.A comprehensive study on transport behaviour and physicochemical characteristics of PU/based 3-phase mixed matrix membranes: effect of [HNMP][HSO4] ionic liquid and ZnO nanoparticles. Sep Purif Technol2024; 335: 126099.
199.
BaltaSSottoALuisP, et al.A new outlook on membrane enhancement with nanoparticles: the alternative of ZnO. J Membr Sci2012; 389: 155–161.
200.
SiddiqueTBaluRMataJ, et al.Electrospun composite nanofiltration membranes for arsenic removal. Polymers (Basel)2022; 14: 1980.
201.
ShenLBianXLuX, et al.Preparation and characterization of ZnO/polyethersulfone (PES) hybrid membranes. Desalination2012; 293: 21–29.
202.
DadashovSDemirelESuvaciE. Tailoring microstructure of polysulfone membranes via novel hexagonal ZnO particles to achieve improved filtration performance. J Membr Sci2022; 651: 120462.
203.
HongJHeY. Polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membrane blended with nano-ZnO particle for photo-catalysis self-cleaning. Desalination2014; 332: 67–75.
204.
ZinadiniSRostamiSVatanpourV, et al.Preparation of antibiofouling polyethersulfone mixed matrix NF membrane using photocatalytic activity of ZnO/MWCNTs nanocomposite. J Membr Sci2017; 529: 133–141.
205.
MoradihamedaniPIbrahimNARamimoghadamD, et al.Polysulfone/zinc oxide nanoparticle mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. J Appl Polym Sci2014; 131: 39745.
206.
TangEChengGMaX. Preparation of nano-ZnO/PMMA composite particles via grafting of the copolymer onto the surface of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Powder Technol2006; 161: 209–214.
207.
ShohurMFHarunZJamalludinMR, et al.Antifouling and antibacterial study of PSf/bio-ZnO nanoparticle (bio-ZnO NP) mixed matrix membrane for humic acid separation. Braz J Chem Eng2024; 42: 1599–1620.
208.
ZhaoSYanWShiM, et al.Improving permeability and antifouling performance of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane by incorporation of ZnO-DMF dispersion containing nano-ZnO and polyvinylpyrrolidone. J Membr Sci2015; 478: 105–116.
209.
Bet-MoushoulEMansourpanahYFarhadiK, et al.Tio2 nanocomposite based polymeric membranes: a review on performance improvement for various applications in chemical engineering processes. Chem Eng J2016; 283: 29–46.
210.
SirelkhatimAMahmudSSeeniA, et al.Review on zinc oxide nanoparticles: antibacterial activity and toxicity mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett2015; 7: 219–242.
211.
SiddiqueTGangadooSQuang PhamD, et al.Antifouling and antimicrobial study of nanostructured mixed-matrix membranes for arsenic filtration. Nanomaterials2023; 13: 738.
212.
ChakrabortyTYadavDSahuLK, et al.CB [6]/ZnO chelated superoleophobic-hydrophilic PVDF membranes for one-step remediation of multi-contaminant in wastewater. Chemosphere2024; 368: 143637.
213.
VeisiPDorrajiMSSRasoulifardMH, et al.Preparation of mixed matrix self-cleaning membrane incorporated by Z-scheme heterostructure via robust engineering in terms of dimension for decreasing cake fouling in a cross-flow reactor. Chemosphere2024; 352: 141526.
FranklinNMRogersNJApteSC, et al.Comparative toxicity of nanoparticulate ZnO, bulk ZnO, and ZnCl2 to a freshwater microalga (pseudokirchneriella subcapitata): the importance of particle solubility. Environ Sci Technol2007; 41: 8484–8490.
216.
Al-AnsaryHKAl-AniFHHernadiK, et al.Optimization of PPSU membranes with ZnO nanoparticles: a morphological and performance evaluation. Desalin Water Treat2025; 321: 101062.
217.
RashidKAslamMRáczE, et al.Mesoporous silica-grafted deep eutectic solvent-based mixed matrix membranes for wastewater treatment: synthesis and emerging pollutant removal performance. Nanotechnol Rev2024; 13: 20230213.
218.
LiebLCCarvalhoCPEberlinMN, et al.Nanofilters to Retain Dyes and Endocrine Interferences in Water Based in Glucose-Based Mixed Matrix Membranes Modified Hybrid Nanoarchitecture. Environ Monit Assess2025; 197: 416.
219.
KamariSShahbaziA. Biocompatible Fe3O4@ SiO2-NH2 nanocomposite as a green nanofiller embedded in PES–nanofiltration membrane matrix for salts, heavy metal ion and dye removal: long–term operation and reusability tests. Chemosphere2020; 243: 125282.
220.
GhorbaniFKamariS. Core–shell magnetic nanocomposite of Fe3O4@ SiO2@ NH2 as an efficient and highly recyclable adsorbent of methyl red dye from aqueous environments. Environ Technol Innov2019; 14: 100333.
221.
PolisettiVRayP. Nano SiO2 and TiO2 embedded polyacrylonitrile/polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes: improvement in flux and antifouling properties. J Appl Polym Sci2021; 138: 49606.
222.
MuhamadMSSalimMRLauWJ, et al.Removal of bisphenol A by adsorption mechanism using PES–SiO2 composite membranes. Environ Technol2016; 37: 1959–1969.
223.
ShakakMRezaeeRMalekiA, et al.Synthesis and characterization of nanocomposite ultrafiltration membrane (PSF/PVP/SiO2) and performance evaluation for the removal of amoxicillin from aqueous solutions. Environ Technol Innov2020; 17: 100529.
224.
LiebLCCarvalhoCPEberlinMN, et al.Nanofilters to retain dyes and endocrine interferences in water based in glucose-based matrix membranes modified with hybrid nanoarchitecture. Environ Monit Assess2025; 197: 1–18.
225.
DhongadeSPMalkapuramSTSonawaneSH, et al.Silicon dioxide incorporated cellulose acetate-mixed matrix membranes for safranin-O removal from aqueous solutions. Environ Sci Pollut Res2024; 32: 31538–31551.
226.
XieHHeX. Organic-inorganic polyimide nanofiltration membrane with triazine and SiO2 cross-linked structures for enhancing dye/inorganic salt separation. Appl Surf Sci2024; 678: 161124.
227.
WangAMuBLazzaraG, et al.Advanced functional materials derived from one-dimensional clay minerals. Front Chem2021; 9: Article number: 821964.
228.
HMTShiraziRMohammadiTAsadiAA. Incorporation of amine-grafted halloysite nanotube to electrospun nanofibrous membranes of chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol) for Cd (II) and Pb (II) removal. Appl Clay Sci2022; 220: 106460.
229.
GrylewiczAMoziaS. Polymeric mixed-matrix membranes modified with halloysite nanotubes for water and wastewater treatment: a review. Sep Purif Technol2021; 256: 117827.
230.
KooshaMRaoufiMMoravvejH. One-pot reactive electrospinning of chitosan/PVA hydrogel nanofibers reinforced by halloysite nanotubes with enhanced fibroblast cell attachment for skin tissue regeneration. Colloids Surf B2019; 179: 270–279.
231.
LeiXLvGXieX, et al.Manufacturing strategies and emerging directions of mixed-matrix membranes based on natural halloysite nanotubes. Sustain Mater Technol2023; 38: e00766.
232.
XuYZhuYQiuQ, et al.Development of mixed-dimensional membranes comprising halloysite nanotubes and kevlar aramid nanofiber for enhanced small-molecule dye/salt separation. Ind Eng Chem Res2023; 62: 1558–1570.
233.
YuLWangHZhangY, et al.Recent advances in halloysite nanotube derived composites for water treatment. Environ Sci: Nano2016; 3: 28–44.
234.
DuanLZhaoQLiuJ, et al.Antibacterial behavior of halloysite nanotubes decorated with copper nanoparticles in a novel mixed matrix membrane for water purification. Environ Sci: Water Res Technol2015; 1: 874–881.
235.
ShinHChaudhariSKimU, et al.Facile preparation of hydrophobic halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) for enhancement of organic solvent nanofiltration performance of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-HNTs mixed matrix membrane. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp2023; 660: 130789.
236.
SimonaCRalucaIAnita-LauraR, et al.Synthesis, characterization and efficiency of new organically modified montmorillonite polyethersulfone membranes for removal of zinc ions from wastewasters. Appl Clay Sci2017; 137: 135–142.
237.
ChungJChunJLeeJ, et al.Sorption of Pb (II) and Cu (II) onto multi-amine grafted mesoporous silica embedded with nano-magnetite: effects of steric factors. J Hazard Mater2012; 239: 183–191.
238.
ChaiPLawJMahmoudiE, et al.Development of iron oxide decorated graphene oxide (Fe3O4/GO) PSf mixed-matrix membrane for enhanced antifouling behavior. J Water Process Eng2020; 38: 101673.
239.
BalkanlooPGMahmoudianMHosseinzadehMT. A comparative study between MMT-Fe3O4/PES, MMT-HBE/PES, and MMT-acid activated/PES mixed matrix membranes. Chem Eng J2020; 396: 125188.
240.
BagheripourEMoghadassiAHosseiniSM. Incorporated poly acrylic acid-co-fe3o4 nanoparticles mixed matrix polyethersulfone based nanofiltration membrane in desalination process. Int J Eng2017; 30: 821–829.
241.
GuangYYuanRZhangB, et al.Constructing asymmetric mixed matrix membrane with high permeance and antifouling performance by magnetic control of COF-coated Fe3O4 particles. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng2025; 171: 106080.
242.
GhaemiNMadaeniSSDaraeiP, et al.Polyethersulfone membrane enhanced with iron oxide nanoparticles for copper removal from water: application of new functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Chem Eng J2015; 263: 101–112.
243.
DaroumiSAroonMAYavariR, et al.Effect of the addition of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on the performance of polyethersulfone nanofiltration membrane for the rejection of 54, 56Mn ions from aqueous solution. J Water Environ Nanotechnol2024; 9: 44–54.
244.
MokubungKEGumbiNNLauWJ, et al.Pine cone derived polyethersulfone/biochar-Fe3O4 mixed matrix membranes for removal of arsenic from acid mine drainage. Chem Eng Res Des2024; 201: 31–44.
245.
KamariSShahbaziA. High–performance nanofiltration membrane blended by Fe3O4@ SiO2–CS bionanocomposite for efficient simultaneous rejection of salts/heavy metals ions/dyes with high permeability, retention increase and fouling decline. Chem Eng J2021; 417: 127930.
246.
ZinadiniSZinatizadehARahimiM, et al.Novel high flux antifouling nanofiltration membranes for dye removal containing carboxymethyl chitosan coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Desalination2014; 349: 145–154.
247.
Vafaee BaghbanMZhianiRHosseinyM, et al.Application of novel immobilized Fe3O4 nanoparticles in mixed matrix polyethersulfone membrane for oily wastewater treatment. Iran J Chem Chem Eng. (IJCCE)2024; 43: 983–999.
248.
HabibiRBarzegarBAghdasiniaH, et al.Enhancement of filtration performance and antifouling properties of polyethersulfone membranes using Fe3O4@ walnut shell-derived activated carbon nanocomposite for heavy metal ions removal. J Environ Chem Eng2024; 12: 113172.
249.
BiLJiaSZhangW, et al.Fabrication of organic solvent nanofiltration membranes through magnetic field-induced surface segregation of Fe3O4@ ZIF8 for salt/dye separation. Sep Purif Technol2025; 362: 131630.
250.
PorotnikovaNOsinkinD. Segregation and interdiffusion processes in perovskites: a review of recent advances. J Mater Chem A2024; 12: 2620–2646.
251.
Al BazediGAliSSHosniM, et al.ZrO2-enhanced cellulose-based mixed matrix membranes for high-recovery fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis water treatment. Sep Purif Technol2025; 380: 135425.
252.
PangRLiXLiJ, et al.Preparation and characterization of ZrO2/PES hybrid ultrafiltration membrane with uniform ZrO2 nanoparticles. Desalination2014; 332: 60–66.
253.
MaximousNNakhlaGWanW, et al.Performance of a novel ZrO2/PES membrane for wastewater filtration. J Membr Sci2010; 352: 222–230.
254.
ZhengY-MZouS-WNanayakkaraKN, et al.Adsorptive removal of arsenic from aqueous solution by a PVDF/zirconia blend flat sheet membrane. J Membr Sci2011; 374: 1–11.
255.
NhlengethwaSTTshanganaCSMambaBB, et al.The application of TiO2/ZrO2-modified nanocomposite PES membrane for improved permeability of textile dye in water. Membranes2024; 14: 222.
256.
ManikantaPNaikNSIsloorAM, et al.The efficacy of Fe-doped ZrO2 nanoparticles as a supplement in polysulfone membranes for toxic dye removal. Process Saf Environ Prot2024; 186: 1460–1470.
257.
PukánszkyBFeketeE. Aggregation tendency of particulate fillers: determination and consequences. Polym Polym Compos1998; 6: 313–322.
258.
ArsuagaJMSottoAdel RosarioG, et al.Influence of the type, size, and distribution of metal oxide particles on the properties of nanocomposite ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci2013; 428: 131–141.
259.
LawWSC. Surface engineering of hydrophilic TiO2 thin fil-applications as self-cleaning materials and for hydroxyapatite coating. UNSW Sydney2009.
260.
KrotoHWHeathJRO’B rienSC, et al.C60: buckminsterfullerene. Nature1985; 318: 162.
261.
IijimaS. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature1991; 354: 56–58.
262.
WangJWangYZhuJ, et al.Construction of TiO2@ graphene oxide incorporated antifouling nanofiltration membrane with elevated filtration performance. J Membr Sci2017; 533: 279–288.
263.
YangH-CHouJChenV, et al.Surface and interface engineering for organic–inorganic composite membranes. J Mater Chem A2016; 4: 9716–9729.
264.
LiRZhangLWangP. Rational design of nanomaterials for water treatment. Nanoscale2015; 7: 17167–17194.
265.
YouYSahajwallaVYoshimuraM, et al.Graphene and graphene oxide for desalination. Nanoscale2015; 8: 117–119.
GohKKarahanHEWeiL, et al.Carbon nanomaterials for advancing separation membranes: a strategic perspective. Carbon N Y2016; 109: 694–710.
268.
HegabHMZouL. Graphene oxide-assisted membranes: fabrication and potential applications in desalination and water purification. J Membr Sci2015; 484: 95–106.
269.
MiB. Graphene oxide membranes for ionic and molecular sieving. Science2014; 343: 740–742.
270.
GohainMBKarkiSIngolePG. Cellulose acetate, a source from discarded cigarette butts for the development of mixed matrix loose nanofiltration membranes for selective separation. Int J Biol Macromol2024; 271: 132197.
271.
JiaZShiW. Tailoring permeation channels of graphene oxide membranes for precise ion separation. Carbon N Y2016; 101: 290–295.
272.
GaoSJQinHLiuP, et al.SWCNT-intercalated GO ultrathin films for ultrafast separation of molecules. J Mater Chem A2015; 3: 6649–6654.
273.
XiY-HHuJ-QLiuZ, et al.Graphene oxide membranes with strong stability in aqueous solutions and controllable lamellar spacing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2016; 8: 15557–15566.
274.
SaitoYLuoXZhaoC, et al.Filling the gaps between graphene oxide: a general strategy toward nanolayered oxides. Adv Funct Mater2015; 25: 5683–5690.
275.
ZeeshanMHRumanUEShafiqM, et al.Intercalation of GO-ag nanoparticles in cellulose acetate nanofiltration mixed matrix membrane for efficient removal of chromium and cobalt ions from wastewater. J Environ Chem Eng2024; 12: 113713.
276.
ShahrinSLauW-JGohP-S, et al.Adsorptive mixed matrix membrane incorporating graphene oxide-manganese ferrite (GMF) hybrid nanomaterial for efficient as (V) ions removal. Compos B Eng2019; 175: 107150.
277.
MahdaviHZeinalipourNKerachianMA, et al.Preparation of high-performance PVDF mixed matrix membranes incorporated with PVDF-g-PMMA copolymer and GO@ SiO2 nanoparticles for dye rejection applications. J Water Process Eng2022; 46: 102560.
278.
Al AaniSGomezVWrightCJ, et al.Fabrication of antibacterial mixed matrix nanocomposite membranes using hybrid nanostructure of silver coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng J2017; 326: 721–736.
279.
TasisDTagmatarchisNBiancoA, et al.Chemistry of carbon nanotubes. Chem Rev2006; 106: 1105–1136.
280.
YuanX-TXuC-XGengH-Z, et al.Multifunctional PVDF/CNT/GO mixed matrix membranes for ultrafiltration and fouling detection. J Hazard Mater2020; 384: 120978.
281.
SoniSKThomasBKarVR. A comprehensive review on CNTs and CNT-reinforced composites: syntheses, characteristics and applications. Mater Today Commun2020; 25: 101546.
282.
LiXMaLZhangH, et al.Synergistic effect of combining carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide in mixed matrix membranes for efficient CO2 separation. J Membr Sci2015; 479: 1–10.
283.
XuLHeJYuY, et al.Effect of CNT content on physicochemical properties and performance of CNT composite polysulfone membranes. Chem Eng Res Des2017; 121: 92–98.
284.
PangWYAhmadALZaulkifleeND. Antifouling and antibacterial evaluation of ZnO/MWCNT dual nanofiller polyethersulfone mixed matrix membrane. J Environ Manage2019; 249: 109358.
285.
WangLSongXWangT, et al.Fabrication and characterization of polyethersulfone/carbon nanotubes (PES/CNTs) based mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) for nanofiltration application. Appl Surf Sci2015; 330: 118–125.
286.
GhaemiNMadaeniSSDaraeiP, et al.PES Mixed matrix nanofiltration membrane embedded with polymer wrapped MWCNT: fabrication and performance optimization in dye removal by RSM. J Hazard Mater2015; 298: 111–121.
287.
ParkCHTocciEFontananovaE, et al.Mixed matrix membranes containing functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes: mesoscale simulation and experimental approach for optimizing dispersion. J Membr Sci2016; 514: 195–209.
288.
Stabilization of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Aqueous Dispersion with Poly-N-vinylpyrrolidone via Polymer-Wrapping. Macromolecular Symposia; 2015. Wiley Online Library.
289.
Medina-GonzalezYRemigyJ-C. Sonication-assisted preparation of pristine MWCNT–polysulfone conductive microporous membranes. Mater Lett2011; 65: 229–232.
290.
FerreiraIAlvesPGilM, et al.Lignin separation from black liquor by mixed matrix polysulfone nanofiltration membrane filled with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Sep Purif Technol2021; 260: 118231.
291.
RostamiMSKhodaeiMM. Investigation of permeability, hydrophilicity, and pollutant removal properties of PES/MIL-53 (Al)@ MWCNT nanofiltration membrane. Chem Eng J2023; 475: 146074.
292.
JiaXSongZLiQ, et al.One-pot synthesis of necklace-like MOF@ CNTs: a universal strategy for enhancing molecular separation performance in mixed-matrix membranes. RSC Applied Interfaces2025; 2: 1041–1050.
NasirMSYangGAyubI, et al.Recent development in graphitic carbon nitride based photocatalysis for hydrogen generation. Appl Catal B: Environ2019; 257: 117855.
295.
GuoFLiMRenH, et al.Facile bottom-up preparation of Cl-doped porous g-C3N4 nanosheets for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline under visible light. Sep Purif Technol2019; 228: 115770.
296.
XuYLinWYuanD, et al.“1 + 1 > 2”: highly efficient removal of organic pollutants by composite nanofibrous membrane based on the synergistic effect of adsorption and photocatalysis. J Mater Sci Technol2022; 124: 76–85.
297.
RanJPanTWuY, et al.Endowing g-C3N4 membranes with superior permeability and stability by using acid spacers. Angew Chem Int Ed2019; 58: 16463–16468.
298.
WangYGaoBYueQ, et al.Graphitic carbon nitride (gC 3 N 4)-based membranes for advanced separation. J Mater Chem A2020; 8: 19133–19155.
299.
WangYLiuLMaT, et al.2D Graphitic carbon nitride for energy conversion and storage. Adv Funct Mater2021; 31: 2102540.
300.
ZhengYLinLWangB, et al.Graphitic carbon nitride polymers toward sustainable photoredox catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed2015; 54: 12868–12884.
301.
MulungulunguGAMaoTHanK. Two-dimensional graphitic carbon nitride-based membranes for filtration process: progresses and challenges. Chem Eng J2022; 427: 130955.
302.
NiuPZhangLLiuG, et al.Graphene-like carbon nitride nanosheets for improved photocatalytic activities. Adv Funct Mater2012; 22: 4763–4770.
303.
SheXXuHXuY, et al.Exfoliated graphene-like carbon nitride in organic solvents: enhanced photocatalytic activity and highly selective and sensitive sensor for the detection of trace amounts of Cu 2 + . J Mater Chem A2014; 2: 2563–2570.
304.
ChengFWangHDongX. The amphoteric properties of g-C3N4 nanosheets and fabrication of their relevant heterostructure photocatalysts by an electrostatic re-assembly route. Chem Commun2015; 51: 7176–7179.
305.
YaoCYuanAZhangH, et al.Facile surface modification of textiles with photocatalytic carbon nitride nanosheets and the excellent performance for self-cleaning and degradation of gaseous formaldehyde. J Colloid Interface Sci2019; 533: 144–153.
306.
LinW-TZhuC-YZhouD, et al.Functionalized g-C3N4 nanosheet interlayer enables enhanced separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. Sep Purif Technol2023; 324: 124543.
307.
MulungulunguGAMaoTHanK. Efficient removal of high-concentration copper ions from wastewater via 2D g-C3N4 photocatalytic membrane filtration. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp2021; 623: 126714.
308.
ZhengTZouXLiM, et al.Two-dimensional graphitic carbon nitride for membrane separation. Chinese J Chem Eng2022; 42: 297–311.
309.
OngW-JTanL-LNgYH, et al.Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based photocatalysts for artificial photosynthesis and environmental remediation: are we a step closer to achieving sustainability?Chem Rev2016; 116: 7159–7329.
310.
DarkwahWKAoY. Mini review on the structure and properties (photocatalysis), and preparation techniques of graphitic carbon nitride nano-based particle, and its applications. Nanoscale Res Lett2018; 13: 388.
311.
WangAWangCFuL, et al.Recent advances of graphitic carbon nitride-based structures and applications in catalyst, sensing, imaging, and LEDs. Nano-Micro Letters2017; 9: 1–21.
312.
LiRRenYZhaoP, et al.Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) nanosheets functionalized composite membrane with self-cleaning and antibacterial performance. J Hazard Mater2019; 365: 606–614.
313.
ZhangHZhangTDingS, et al.Development of loose thin film nanofibrous composite nanofiltration membrane with modified g-C3N4 nanosheets barrier layer for efficient separation of salt/dye mixtures. Sep Purif Technol2023; 306: 122661.
314.
KarthikGMohanSBalakrishnaRG. Engineering Ni-MOF/g-C3N4 composite-infused polysulfone membranes with optimal rejection, flux, antifouling, and photocatalytic properties for wastewater treatment. ACS ES&T Water2024; 4: 4454–4463.
315.
SalehianSHeydariHKhansanamiM, et al.Fabrication and performance of polysulfone/H2O2-g-C3N4 mixed matrix membrane in a photocatalytic membrane reactor under visible light irradiation for removal of natural organic matter. Sep Purif Technol2022; 285: 120291.
316.
VatanpourVPazireshSDehqanA, et al.Hydrogen peroxide treated g-C3N4 as an effective hydrophilic nanosheet for modification of polyethersulfone membranes with enhanced permeability and antifouling characteristics. Chemosphere2021; 279: 130616.
317.
SagbasSSahinerN. Carbon dots: preparation, properties, and application. In Nanocarbon and its Composites. Elsevier; 2019: 651–676.
318.
KoulivandHShahbaziAVatanpourV, et al.Development of carbon dot-modified polyethersulfone membranes for enhancement of nanofiltration, permeation and antifouling performance. Sep Purif Technol2020; 230: 115895.
319.
YuanZWuXJiangY, et al.Carbon dots-incorporated composite membrane towards enhanced organic solvent nanofiltration performance. J Membr Sci2018; 549: 1–11.
320.
MehrjoFShahbaziA. Revolutionary dual nanofiller embedded nanofiltration membranes: fabricated CQDs and PMO-PPD modified membranes for experimental design optimization of simultaneous removal of pb (ii), MO, and NaCl from wastewater. Environ Sci: Water Res Technol2025; 11: 435–448.
321.
WeiWWangMJiangJ. Molecular simulation study on molecularly mixed porous organic cage/polymer composite membranes for water desalination and solvent recovery. ACS Appl Nano Mater2021; 4: 10378–10388.
322.
CuiJ-WYangJ-HSunJ-K. Organic cage-based frameworks: From synthesis to applications. Chemical Synthesis2024; 4.
323.
JiangZWangYShengM, et al.A highly permeable porous organic cage composite membrane for gas separation. J Mater Chem A2023; 11: 6831–6841.
324.
YangXUllahZStoddartJF, et al.Porous organic cages. Chem Rev2023; 123: 4602–4634.
325.
ZhuGZhangFRiveraMP, et al. Molecularly mixed composite membranes for advanced separation processes. Angew Chem Int Ed2019; 58: 2638–2643.
326.
SongZLiuLSunQ, et al. Crystalline porous organic cage membranes constructed using fortified intermolecular interactions for molecular sieving. Angew Chem Int Ed2024; 63: e202409296.
327.
YuLHaoLZhangC, et al.Porous organic cage induced high CO2/CH4 separation efficiency of carbon molecular sieve membranes. J Membr Sci2024; 711: 123231.
328.
TozawaTJonesJTSwamySI, et al. Porous organic cages. Nat Mater2009; 8: 973–978.
329.
ZhaZWangJWangZ, et al.Mixed-matrix membranes comprising porous organic molecular cage for efficient CO2 capture. Carbon Capture Sci Technol2024; 10: 100152.
330.
JonesJTHasellTWuX, et al.Modular and predictable assembly of porous organic molecular crystals. Nature2011; 474: 367–371.
331.
GiriNDel PópoloMGMelaughG, et al.Liquids with permanent porosity. Nature2015; 527: 216–220.
332.
JiangSJonesJTHasellT, et al.Porous organic molecular solids by dynamic covalent scrambling. Nat Commun2011; 2: 207.
333.
HasellTChongSYJelfsKE, et al.Porous organic cage nanocrystals by solution mixing. J Am Chem Soc2012; 134: 588–598.
334.
LiXLinWSharmaV, et al.Polycage membranes for precise molecular separation and catalysis. Nat Commun2023; 14: 3112.
335.
WangYYangYZhaZ, et al.Porous organic cage supramolecular membrane showing superior monovalent/divalent salts separation. J Membr Sci2022; 659: 120782.
336.
ZhaoAZhangMBaoY, et al.Loose nanofiltration membrane constructed via interfacial polymerization using porous organic cage RCC3 for dye/salt separation. J Membr Sci2022; 664: 121081.
337.
HeYLuoDLynchVM, et al.Porous adaptive luminescent metallacage for the detection and removal of perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids. Chem2023; 9: 93–101.
338.
LiuMZhangLLittleMA, et al.Barely porous organic cages for hydrogen isotope separation. Science2019; 366: 613–620.
339.
SuKWangWDuS, et al.Efficient ethylene purification by a robust ethane-trapping porous organic cage. Nat Commun2021; 12: 3703.
340.
WangZSikdarNWangS-Q, et al.Soft porous crystal based upon organic cages that exhibit guest-induced breathing and selective gas separation. J Am Chem Soc2019; 141: 9408–9414.
341.
ChenLReissPSChongSY, et al.Separation of rare gases and chiral molecules by selective binding in porous organic cages. Nat Mater2014; 13: 954–960.
342.
HeAJiangZWuY, et al.A smart and responsive crystalline porous organic cage membrane with switchable pore apertures for graded molecular sieving. Nat Mater2022; 21: 463–470.
343.
YangXSunJ-KKittaM, et al.Encapsulating highly catalytically active metal nanoclusters inside porous organic cages. Nature Catalysis2018; 1: 214–220.
344.
XuTWuBHouL, et al.Highly ion-permselective porous organic cage membranes with hierarchical channels. J Am Chem Soc2022; 144: 10220–10229.
345.
Martínez-AhumadaEHeDBerrymanV, et al.SO2 Capture using porous organic cages. Angew Chem Int Ed2021; 60: 17556–17563.
346.
QuKXuJDaiL, et al.Electrostatic-induced crystal-rearrangement of porous organic cage membrane for CO2 capture. Angew Chem Int Ed2022; 61: e202205481.
347.
TianKElbertSMHuXY, et al.Highly selective adsorption of perfluorinated greenhouse gases by porous organic cages. Adv Mater2022; 34: 2202290.
348.
EvansJDHuangDMHillMR, et al.Feasibility of mixed matrix membrane gas separations employing porous organic cages. J Phys Chem C2014; 118: 1523–1529.
349.
ZhaoZJiangJ. POC/PIM-1 mixed-matrix membranes for water desalination: a molecular simulation study. J Membr Sci2020; 608: 118173.
350.
SikderMTRahmanMMJakariyaM, et al.Remediation of water pollution with native cyclodextrins and modified cyclodextrins: a comparative overview and perspectives. Chem Eng J2019; 355: 920–941.
351.
CriniG. Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment. Prog Polym Sci2005; 30: 38–70.
352.
GaoHSunXGaoC. Antifouling polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes with sulfobetaine polyimides as novel additive for the enhancement of both water flux and protein rejection. J Membr Sci2017; 542: 81–90.
353.
BaruahKHazarikaSBorthakurS, et al.Preparation and characterization of polysulfone–cyclodextrin composite nanofiltration membrane: solvent effect. J Appl Polym Sci2012; 125: 3888–3898.
354.
SzejtliJ. Introduction and general overview of cyclodextrin chemistry. Chem Rev1998; 98: 1743–1754.
355.
RahimiZZinatizadehAAZinadiniS, et al.β-cyclodextrin functionalized MWCNTs as a promising antifouling agent in fabrication of composite nanofiltration membranes. Sep Purif Technol2020; 247: 116979.
356.
CriniG. A history of cyclodextrins. Chem Rev2014; 114: 10940–10975.
357.
GuillenGRPanYLiM, et al.Preparation and characterization of membranes formed by nonsolvent induced phase separation: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res2011; 50: 3798–3817.
358.
KozlowskiCASliwaW. The use of membranes with cyclodextrin units in separation processes: recent advances. Carbohydr Polym2008; 74: 1–9.
359.
AdamsFVNxumaloENKrauseRW, et al.Preparation and characterization of polysulfone/β-cyclodextrin polyurethane composite nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci2012; 405: 291–299.
360.
WuHTangBWuP. Preparation and characterization of anti-fouling β-cyclodextrin/polyester thin film nanofiltration composite membrane. J Membr Sci2013; 428: 301–308.
361.
AdamsFNxumaloEKrauseR, et al.Application of polysulfone/cyclodextrin mixed-matrix membranes in the removal of natural organic matter from water. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C2014; 67: 71–78.
362.
AdamsFVNxumaloENKrauseRW, et al.The influence of solvent properties on the performance of polysulfone/β-cyclodextrin polyurethane mixed-matrix membranes. J Appl Polym Sci2013; 130: 2005–2014.
363.
NjarambaLKYoonYParkCM. Fabrication of porous beta-cyclodextrin functionalized PVDF/fe–MOF mixed matrix membrane for enhanced ciprofloxacin removal. npj Clean Water2024; 7: 14.
364.
MaJHeYZengG, et al.High-flux PVDF membrane incorporated with β-cyclodextrin modified halloysite nanotubes for dye rejection and Cu (II) removal from water. Polym Adv Technol2018; 29: 2704–2714.
365.
LiangHZouCTangW. Development of novel polyether sulfone mixed matrix membranes to enhance antifouling and sustainability: treatment of oil sands produced water (OSPW). J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng2021; 118: 215–222.
366.
NazirSWaniIAMasoodiFA. Extraction optimization of mucilage from basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) seeds using response surface methodology. J Adv Res2017; 8: 235–244.
367.
OsanoJPHosseini-ParvarSHMatia-MerinoL, et al.Emulsifying properties of a novel polysaccharide extracted from basil seed (Ocimum bacilicum L.): effect of polysaccharide and protein content. Food Hydrocolloids2014; 37: 40–48.
368.
KurdFFathiMShekarchizadehH. Basil seed mucilage as a new source for electrospinning: production and physicochemical characterization. Int J Biol Macromol2017; 95: 689–695.
369.
ShamsnejatiSChaibakhshNPendashtehAR, et al.Mucilaginous seed of Ocimum basilicum as a natural coagulant for textile wastewater treatment. Ind Crops Prod2015; 69: 40–47.
370.
TafreshiJFashandiHAmini ErshadG. Modification of polysulfone membrane using basil seed gum nanoparticles for removal of methylene blue from wastewater. J Color Sci Technol2020; 14: 25–39.
371.
LinC-HGungC-HSunJ-J, et al.Preparation of polyethersulfone/plant-waste-particles mixed matrix membranes for adsorptive removal of cationic dyes from water. J Membr Sci2014; 471: 285–298.
372.
ZaidiSQAWadgamaMHJahanZ, et al.Tuning water transport channels in sulfonated copolymer membranes for highly effective removal of arsenic and selenium from industrial wastewater. Desalination2025; 613: 119027.
