The long-standing interface between industry and education is moving under new pressures from both sides of the relationship. This paper examines this fluid state of affairs from an international macroscopic and microscopic point of view, focusing on computer-aided learning, broadly defined, as a primary indicator of the resultant of forces at this interface.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BissonnetteL.‘A bargain for students, but not for universities’, The Globe and Mail, p D2, Toronto, 2February1989.
2.
BalkovichE.LermanS. and ParmeleeP. R.‘Computing in higher education: the Athena experience’, Communications of the ACM, Vol 28, No 11, pp 1215–18, November1985.
3.
IDEA: Innovation Development for Employment Advancement, a subsidiary of BILD, the Board of Industrial Leadership and Development, government of Ontario.
4.
Science Council of Canada, Winning in a World Economy: University-Industry Interaction and Economic Renewal in Canada, Report 39, Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa, 1988.
5.
Science Council of Canada, Winning in a World Economy: University-Industry Interaction and Economic Renewal in Canada, Report 39, Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa, 1988.
6.
BarnesG. J. and PetersG. R.The Teaching Company Scheme: A Study of its Application in Canada, a Science Council of Canada Discussion Paper, the Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa, May1987.
7.
ColeB. and JackB.‘Case study: The Glasgow College/Scomagg Limited Teaching Company Scheme’, Industry & Higher Education, Vol 2, No 3, September1988, pp 178–81.
8.
Jupiter Consortium Ltd, Linking Industry and Academia, brochure, Uxbridge, 1987.
9.
Further Education Unit, Who Needs IT?Department of Education and Science, London, 1987.
10.
‘European companies form research network to forge university-industry links’. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 6January, 1988, pp A1, A36.
11.
‘Monitor: European University-Industry Forum’, Industry & Higher Education. Vol 2, No 4, December1988, pp 261–2.
12.
BarblanA.‘Europe works: the European University-Industry Forum’, Industry & Higher Education, Vol 2, No 3, September1988, pp 139–40.
13.
EurichD. N.Corporate Classrooms: The Learning Business, The Carnegie Foundation, Princeton, NJ, 1985.
14.
BlandinM. D.‘Common ground: Lessons for building industry-university alliances’. Industry & Higher Education, Vol 2. No 4, December1988, pp 204–6.
15.
BlandinM. D.‘Common ground: Lessons for building industry-university alliances’. Industry & Higher Education, Vol 2. No 4, December1988, pp 204–6.
16.
Corporate—Higher Education Forum, brochure, n. p. Montreal, September1988. See also Patricia Roman, ‘Canada's Corporate- Higher Education Forum: shaping shared interests’, Industry & Higher Education. Vol 3. No 2, June1989, pp 103–6.
17.
AT&T Canada Inc, Canadian Education Update, Vol 1. No 2, Winter 1989, p 1, Willowdale, Ontario.
18.
MattelartA.Multinational Corporations and the Control of Culture: The Ideological Apparatuses of Imperialism, translated from the French (1976) by ChananMichael, p ix, translator's preface. Humanities Press Inc, Atlantic Highlands. NJ, 1979.
19.
MattelartA.Multinational Corporations and the Control of Culture: The Ideological Apparatuses of Imperialism, translated from the French (1976) by ChananMichael, p ix, translator's preface. Humanities Press Inc, Atlantic Highlands. NJ, 1979.
20.
DiemerJ.‘Aut vincere aut mori’, in 1982 Conference Proceedings, p 1, Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems, 1982.
21.
ScheffelD.‘In my opinion/A mon avis’, University Affairs/Affaires Universitaires, Vol 30, No 2, February1989. pp 20–21, Ottawa.
22.
CampbellM.‘Degrees of quality, part 6: Universities woo business in uneasy alliance’, The Globe and Mail, p A4, Toronto, 30March1989.
