This paper presents Reverse Sabbaticals 2.0, a curriculum-centered framework designed to address persistent gaps between academic instruction and evolving industry requirements. Although universities and industries collaborate through internships, guest lectures, sponsored research, and technology transfer, these interactions rarely influence the design of core curricula. Reverse Sabbaticals 2.0 proposes structured two-way exchanges between faculty and industry professionals to enable curriculum co creation and applied learning. The model organizes participation across three tiers of engagement; Engage, Embed, and Elevate and two participation tracks involving faculty externships in industry and practitioner participation in academic roles. The framework is informed by a systematic review of 28 peer-reviewed studies supported by bibliometric mapping and expert consultation. Building on principles of experiential learning and collaborative curriculum design, the paper also outlines a research agenda across six domains to guide future empirical testing and institutional implementation of structured academia–industry collaboration.
Abd MananZRafidah Wan AlwiS (2021) Driving a sustainable university-industry partnership. Sustainable Organizations - Models, Applications, and New Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94990
2.
AgrawalRShuklaP (2024) Bridging the gap between industry needs and student preparedness: a review of curriculum alignment strategies in higher education. SDGs Review: Journal of Sustainable Development Goals4(4): e03616. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n04.pe03616
3.
AhmedFFattaniMTAliSR, et al. (2022) Strengthening the bridge between academic and the industry through the academia–industry collaboration plan design model. Frontiers in Psychology13: 875940. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875940
4.
AlexanderAMartinDPManolchevC, et al. (2020) University–industry collaboration: using meta-rules to overcome barriers to knowledge transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer45: 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9685-1
AnthuvanTMaheshwariK (2025) AI-C2C (conscious to conscience): a governance framework for ethical AI integration. AI and Ethics5: 4241–4253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00736-2
7.
AsiriMS (2025) Exploring graduate programs’ curriculum review discussions in partnership with industry players through social exchange perspectives. Environment and Social Psychology10(1): Article3260. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i1.3260
8.
BanerjeeSAgrawallaB (2025) Academia and industry: an essential alliance for a sustainable future. Innovation of Chemistry & Materials for Sustainability2: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.63654/icms.2025.02001
9.
BaoHBravo-AltamiranoKBuchanZ, et al. (2024) Academic–industrial collaborations: merging paths to thrive. Organic Letters26(14): 2669–2671. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.4c01107
10.
BarkerA (2018) An academic’s observations from a sabbatical at Google: how experiences gained in industry can improve academic research and teaching. Communications of the ACM61(9): 31–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3177748
11.
BayerleinLJeskeD (2018) The potential of computer-mediated internships for higher education. International Journal of Educational Management32(4): 526–537. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2016-0254
12.
BermanEMWestJP (2008) Managing emotional intelligence in U.S. cities: A study of social skills among public managers. Public Administration Review68(4): 742–758. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00912.x.
13.
BoscoAMFernsS (2014) Embedding of authentic assessment in work-integrated learning curriculum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education15(4): 281–290. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1113553
ChenL (2023) Reform and practice of online and offline integrated teaching based on 'industry–university cooperation and collaborative education': taking the course of international settlement of GDUFS as an example. Theory and Practice of Social Science5(3): 050304. https://doi.org/10.6914/tpss.050304
16.
De JagerHJMthembuTZNgowiAB, et al. (2017) Towards an innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem: a case study of the central University of technology, free state. Science Technology & Society22(1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721817702292
17.
De ReuverMSørensenCBasoleRC (2018) The digital platform: a research agenda. Journal of Information Technology33(2): 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3
18.
DearingAHagenSBorrell-DamiánL, et al. (2010) Collaborative doctoral education: University–industry partnerships for enhancing knowledge exchange. Higher Education Policy23(4): 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1057/HEP.2010.20
19.
GarousiVMäntyläMVFeldererM (2016) Challenges and best practices in industry–academia collaborations in software engineering: a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology79: 106–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.07.006
HartmanRLHickmanDAPalumboA, et al. (2025) Breaking barriers for academic–industry sabbaticals. AIChE Journal71(5): e18655. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.18655
22.
HoltD (2004) Developing professional expertise in the knowledge economy: integrating industry-based learning with the academic curriculum in the field of information technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education5(2): 1–11, Available from. https://www.ijwil.org/files/APJCE_05_2_1_11.pdf
23.
KaickerAMathurPKandulaA, et al. (2023) Industry–academia interaction in India: the current scenario and the future. Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health23(1): 14–22. https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2023/31937
24.
KellyJGielstraDHadleyS, et al. (2023) Uniting academia and industry to bridge the skills gap: incorporating industry advisory councils in curriculum-to-careers programmatic mapping. Industry and Higher Education38(2): 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222231175413
25.
KettunenPJärvinenJMikkonenT, et al. (2022) Energizing collaborative industry–academia learning: a present case and future visions. European Journal of Forest Research10(8): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-022-00196-5
KulkarniUDesaiA (2021) Academic excellence through industry–institute collaboration. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations34(0): 157177. https://doi.org/10.16920/JEET/2021/V34I0/157177
28.
MalhotraRMassoudiMJindalR (2023) An alumni-based collaborative model to strengthen academia and industry partnership: the current challenges and strengths. Education and Information Technologies28: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11276-1
29.
MarquesCSFerreiraJJMarquesCP, et al. (2024) Understanding university–industry collaboration: a social exchange perspective on the entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10084-8
30.
MenonSRamanRSureshM (2021) Enablers facilitating industry–academia, transnational education and university–community partnering agility in higher education. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning11(4): 1191–1212. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-04-2021-0067
NadhPO (2022) The neoliberal transformation of academia–industry relationships in India: a critical assessment. Social Science Information61(1): 100–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184211073064
OrecchiniFValituttiVVitaliG (2012) Industry and academia for a transition towards sustainability: advancing sustainability science through university–business collaborations. Sustainability Science7(1): 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0151-3
37.
OtacheI (2022) Enhancing graduates’ employability through polytechnic–industry collaboration. Industry and Higher Education36(5): 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222211063140
38.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ372: n71. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2
39.
PantanowitzLBuiMMChauhanC, et al. (2022) Rules of engagement: promoting academic–industry partnership in the era of digital pathology and artificial intelligence. Academic Pathology9: 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100026
40.
PereiraETVilas-BoasMRebeloCFC (2020) University curricula and employability: the stakeholders’ views for a future agenda. Industry and Higher Education34(5): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422220901676
41.
PrabhuramSBhavaniGTaramolKG (2020) Entrepreneur education, learn before the leap: a study on UAE entrepreneurs. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology11(1–3): 25–31. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566764.2020/11.1-3.300
ThongnunWChiwpreechaKWongwisutthiratK, et al. (2025) Advancing employability through work-based learning: a case study of Guangdong University of technology’s application-oriented approach. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Managementl10(36): 6642. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i36s.6642
44.
TushmanMLScanlanTJ (1981) Boundary spanning individuals: their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal24(2): 289–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/255842
45.
Valiente BermejoMAEynianMMalmsköldL, et al. (2022) University–industry collaboration in curriculum design and delivery: a model and its application in manufacturing engineering courses. Industry and Higher Education36(5): 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222211064204
46.
WaterburyTWozneyNNosekC, et al. (2017) The collaborative improvement model: an interpretive study of revising a curriculum. Journal of Professional Nursing33(1): 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.05.006
WittPHickmanDAHerronJ (2021) Educational intensification: a partnership between industry and academia. Chemical Engineering Education55(4): 211–217. https://doi.org/10.18260/2-1-370.660-128079
50.
WohlinC (2014) Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering (EASE 2014),London, England, United Kingdom, 13–14 May2014, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601268
ZouPYangQ (2024) School-enterprise synergy: exploration and practice of the cooperation model between professional teachers and enterprise engineers. Journal of Education and Educational Research8: 94–96. https://doi.org/10.54097/5cgr2k34
